Computer Attitude of Teaching Faculty: Implications for Technology-Based Performance in Higher Education
ARTICLE
Josephine A. Larbi-Apau, James L. Moseley, Wayne State University, United States
JITE-Research Volume 11, Number 1, ISSN 1539-3585 Publisher: Informing Science Institute
Abstract
This study examined the validity of Selwyn’s computer attitude scale (CAS) and its implication for technology-based performance of randomly sampled (n=167) multidiscipline teaching faculty in higher education in Ghana. Considered, computer attitude is a critical function of computer attitude and potential performance. Composed of four constructs, and using a five-point Likert rating scale, the CAS measured affective, perceived behavioral control, behavior, and perceived usefulness attitudes as multi-construct of computer attitude. The reliability of the overall computer attitude and all four constructs scales are positive with high internal consistencies (> .70) and significant construct validity (p < 0.001). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed significant mean differences across all four constructs at p = 0.001. Affective attitude was the highest contributor of computer attitude followed by perceived usefulness, behavior, and perceived behavioral control attitudes. The teaching faculty has relatively high positive computer attitude; with purposeful practice and enabling environment, they can manage technology-oriented proficiencies and professional performances effectively. Further studies in private and public universities worldwide are proposed for practical and academic significance. In addition, relational and invariance of CAS across demographic factors such as gender, age, academic status, and subject discipline are proposed for their differential influence.
Citation
Larbi-Apau, J.A. & Moseley, J.L. (2012). Computer Attitude of Teaching Faculty: Implications for Technology-Based Performance in Higher Education. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11(1), 221-233. Informing Science Institute. Retrieved August 7, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/111502/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitude, personality, and behavior. Chicago, IL: Dorsey Press.
- Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior (2nd ed.). Milton-Keynes, UK: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.
- Albion, P.R. (1999). Self-efficacy beliefs as an indicator of teachers’ preparedness for teaching with technology. In J.D. Price, J. Willis, D.A. Willis, M. Jost, & S. Boger-Mehall (Eds.), Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference, (pp. 1602-1608).
- Cázares, A. (2010). Proficiency and attitudes toward information technology use in psychology undergraduates. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1004-1008. Doi:10.1016/jchb2010.02.015Chin,T.O.(N.D.).Assessmentof staff attitudes towards computers and its implications on the use of IT in school. Anglo-Chinese School (Independent). Singapore. Retrieved from http://www3.moe.edu.sg/edumall/mpite/edtech/papers/b6_3.pdf Hsu, M.K., Wang, W.S., & Chiu, K.K. (2009). Computer attitude, anxiety and self-efficacy on statistical software adoption behavior: An empirical study of online MBA learners, Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 412-420.
- Jegede, P.O. (2007, September). Computer attitude as correlates of computer self efficacy among SouthWestern Nigerian higher education teachers. Paper presented at Sixth International Internet Education Conference, Cairo: Egypt.
- Jegede, P.O. (2008). ICT attitudinal characteristics and use level of Nigeria teachers. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 5, 261-265.
- Jegede, P.O., & Owolabi, O. (2005). Effects of professional status, subject discipline and computer access on computer attitudes among teacher educators in Nigeria Colleges of Education. Information Technology Journal, 4(2), 58-162.
- Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., & Chervany, N.L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: Across-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. Management Information System Quarterly, 23(2), 183-213.
- Keppel, G., & Wickens, T.D. (2004). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
- Kim, H., & Davis, K. (2008). Toward a comprehensive theory of problematic Internet use: Evaluating the role of self-esteem, anxiety, flow, and the self-rated importance of Internet activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 490-500. Doi:101.1016/J.chb.2008.11.001
- Larbi-Apau, J.A. (2011). Computer attitude, and the impact of personal characteristics and information and communication technology adoption patterns on performance of teaching faculty in higher education. (Doctoral Dissertation). Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest UMI.
- Morris, L.V., Xu, H., & Finnegan, C.L. (2005). Roles of faculty in teaching asynchronous undergraduate courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks (JALN), 9(1), 65-82.
- Computer Attitude of Teaching FacultyOnline Merriam-Webster Dictionary (2011). Technophobia. Retrieved from http://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/technophobia
- Park, Y., & Moser, F.Z. (2008). Identifying the role of international consortium “MIT/LINC” in supporting the integration of ICT in higher education in emerging countries. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(20), 197-207. Doi:10.1007/s10956-007-9056-4)
- Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
- Saadé, R.G., & Kira, D. (2009). Computer anxiety in elearning: The effect of computer self-efficacy. Journal of Information Technology Education, 8, 177-191. Retrieved from http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol8/JITEv8p177-191Saade724.pdf Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio, causal and control beliefs (pp. 3537).
- Yaghi, H.M., & Abu-Saba, M.B. (1998). Teachers’ computer anxiety: An international perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 14(2), 321-336.
- Yushau, B. (2006). Computer attitude, use, experience, software familiarity, and perceived pedagogical usefulness: The case of mathematics professors, Eurasia. Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(3), 1-17.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References