Flexible Delivery Damaging to Learning? Lessons from the Canterbury Digital Lectures Project

Purchase or Subscription required for access

Purchase individual articles and papers

PayPal Logo

Receive full-text access to individual articles for $9.95 USD each.

Use PayPal button to purchase PDF copy of paper (5 pages)

Subscribe for faster access!

Subscribe and receive access to 100,000+ documents, for only $19/month (or $150/year).

Already have access?

Individual Subscription

If you have an individual subscription, sign in here for access

Institutional Subscription

You don't appear to be accessing the site through a subscribing institution (your IP address is 3.12.164.102).

If your university, college, or library subscribes to LearnTechLib, you may be able access full text articles through a login page.

You can search for your instition by name or by location.

Login via Institution

Authors

Tim Bell, Andy Cockburn, Bruce McKenzie, John Vargo, University of Canterbury, New Zealand

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, 2001 in Norfolk, VA USA ISBN 978-1-880094-42-6

Abstract

Preparing courses for flexible delivery and distance education is normally a timeconsuming and expensive process. This paper describes the design and evaluation of a system that automatically captures and indexes audio and video streams of traditional university lectures without demanding any changes in the style or tools used by teachers. Using a `wizard-of-oz' technique to simulate the automatic indexing, we ran a four-month trial of the system in a large (746 students) first year Computer Studies course. The results reveal some surprising social implications of making flexible delivery available to students at a residential university. Early in the trial, many students expressed an intention to use the system, but few did. Late in the course, many students stated that they urgently needed the system for revision, but even fewer used it. At the same time, lecture attendance appeared to be lower than normal. We hypothesise that the availability of a flexible alternative to lectures removed the necessity of attending lectures, and that students deceived themselves about their intentions to catch up using the digital medium.

Citation

Bell, T., Cockburn, A., McKenzie, B. & Vargo, J. (2001). Flexible Delivery Damaging to Learning? Lessons from the Canterbury Digital Lectures Project. In C. Montgomerie & J. Viteli (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2001--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 117-122). Norfolk, VA USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 14, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/8347.