Claims Analysis Meets Structuration Theory: Analysing Qualitative Students’ Interactions with NTU’s edveNTUre
Purchase or Subscription required for access
Purchase individual articles and papers
Subscribe for faster access!
Subscribe and receive access to 100,000+ documents, for only $19/month (or $150/year).
Already have access?
Individual Subscription
If you have an individual subscription, sign in here for access
Institutional Subscription
You don't appear to be accessing the site through a subscribing institution (your IP address is 18.189.178.117).
If your university, college, or library subscribes to LearnTechLib, you may be able access full text articles through a login page.
You can search for your instition by name or by location.
Author
![](https://editlib-media.s3.amazonaws.com/sources/sources/EDMEDIA_2018Jul10_1.png)
EdMedia + Innovate Learning, Jun 30, 2008 in Vienna, Austria ISBN 978-1-880094-65-5
Abstract
In contrast with quantitative usability evaluations, qualitative evaluations are often criticized for not producing statistically significant findings because of the small sample population used in the studies. Using a case study of a good e-learning system, edveNTUre, at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, this paper demonstrates that even with six subjects, we can obtain rich analyses of user interactions with edveNTUre. Well-established theories such as Interaction Framework, Claims Analysis and Structuration Theory were synthesized to analyse user interactions, adding meaning and “depth” to the observational data collected.
Citation
Theng, Y.L. (2008). Claims Analysis Meets Structuration Theory: Analysing Qualitative Students’ Interactions with NTU’s edveNTUre. In J. Luca & E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2008--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 1494-1503). Vienna, Austria: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 15, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/28578.
© 2008 AACE