Exploring Social Communication in Computer Conferencing
Article
Liam Rourke, Terry Anderson, University of Alberta, Canada
Journal of Interactive Learning Research Volume 13, Number 3, ISSN 1093-023X Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC
Abstract
This study explores the relationship between asynchronous, text-based forms of social communication and students' perceptions of the social climate of computer conferences. A 21-item questionnaire was administered to 74 students from 4 faculties. Students rated the social climate of the conference along six dimensions. A majority of students found the conference warm, friendly, trusting, disinhibiting, and personal. Students also rated the perceived frequency of 15 types of social communication. The correlation between aggregate scores for both sets of variables was r = .4, p < .001, r squared = .16. A series of one way-ANOVA's indicated that an increase in the perceived frequency of 7 of the 15 social expressions corresponded to more positive ratings of the social environment. The 7 social expressions included addressing others by name, complimenting, expressing appreciation, using the reply feature to post messages, expressing emotions, using humor, and salutations. Based on responses to two open-ended questions, moderators are encouraged to seek a balance between social communication and challenging and productive discussion.
Citation
Rourke, L. & Anderson, T. (2002). Exploring Social Communication in Computer Conferencing. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(3), 259-275. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 28, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/15133/.
© 2002 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Andersen, J. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Niimo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 3 (pp. 543-559).
- Borg, W., & Gall, M. (1989). The Methods and tools of observational research. In W. Borg & M. Gall (Eds.), Educational research: An introduction (5th ed.) (pp. 415-466). London: Longman.
- Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Bullen, M. (1998). Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 13 (2), 1-32.
- Chen, G. (1994). Social desirability as a predictor of argumentativeness and communication apprehension. Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary& Applied, 128(4) , 433-439.
- Diaz, D.P., & Cartnal, R.B. (1999). Students’ learning styles in two classes: Online distance learning and equivalent on-campus. College Teaching 47(4), 130-135. Fabro , K. , & Garrison, D.R. (1998). Computer conferencing and higher-order learning. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 7(1) , 41-54.
- Fahraeus, E. (1999). Tutoring group learninga t a distance. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED323227)
- Feenberg, A. (1989). The written world: On the theory and practice of computer conferencing, In R. Mason& A. Kaye (Eds.), Mindweave: Communication, computers, and distance education (pp. 22-39). Toronto: Pergamon Press.
- Fisher, K., Phelps, R., & Ellis, A. (2000). Group processes: Teaching collaboration through collaborative processes. Educational Technology and Society 3(3).
- Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (1996). How to design and evaluate research on education (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Garrison, R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical thinking in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. 274 Rourke and Anderson
- Gee, D. (1990). The impacto f students’ preferred learnings ty le variables in a distance education course: A cases tudy. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED348117) Grin t , K. (1989). Accounting for failure: Participation and non-participation in CMC. In R. Mason& A. Kaye (Eds.) , Mindweave: Communica-t ion , computers and distance education (pp. 189-192). Oxford, UK:
- Hara, N., Bonk, C., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of on-line discussion in an applied education psychology course. Instructional Science, 28(2), 115-152.
- Henri, F. (1991). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. Kaye (Ed.) , Collaborative learning through computer conferencing (pp. 117136)
- Howell-Richardson, C., & Mellar, H. (1996). A methodology for the analysis of participation patterns within computer-mediated communication courses. Instructional Science, 24 (1), 47-69.
- Johnson, D., & Johnson, T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive and individualistic learning. Toronto: Allyn and Bacon.
- Jonassen, D. (2000). Computers in the classrooms: Mindtools for critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (1998). On-line social interchange, discord and knowledge construction. Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 57-74.
- Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (2000). Measuring presence: A literature based approach to the development of a standardized paper-and-pencil in-s trumen t. A paper presented at Presence 2000: The Third International Workshop on Presence, Delft, The Netherlands.
- McCormick, N., & McCormick, J. (1992). Computer friends and foes: Content of undergraduates’ electronic mail. Computers in Human Behaviour, 8, 379-405.
- Piaget, J. (1964). The psychology of intelligence. London: Fourth Impression.
- Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Archer, W., & Garrison, D.R. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous, text-based computer conferences. Journal of Distance Education, 14 (3), 51-70.
- Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Toronto: John Wiley and Sons.
- Slavin, R. (1980). Cooperative learning: What research says to the teacher. Baltimore: Center for Social Organization of Schools.
- Zhu, E. (1996). Meeting negotiation, knowledge construction, and mentoring in a distance learning course. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED397849) Note
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesCited By
View References & Citations Map-
What Social Presence is, what it isn’t, and how to measure it: A work in progress
Joshua Weidlich, FernUniversität in Hagen, Germany; Karel Kreijns & Kamakshi Rajagopal, Open University, Heerlen, Netherlands; Theo Bastiaens, FernUniversität in Hagen, Germany
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2018 (Jun 25, 2018) pp. 2142–2150
-
Increasing Social Presence in Online Learning through Small Group Discussions
Mete Akcaoglu; Eunbae Lee, Georgia Southern University
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 17, No. 3 (May 16, 2016)
-
Online Socialization through Social Software and Networks from an Educational Perspective
Yasemin Gülbahar, Ankara University, Turkey
International Journal on E-Learning 14 (2015) pp. 199–222
-
Online learning management systems (LMS) and sense of community: A pre-service practicum perspective
Glenn Rideout, Robert Bruinsma, John Hull, Jacob Modayil & Jacob Modayil
Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie Vol. 33, No. 3 (May 23, 2008)
-
The “Walled Garden” approach to Social Networking: Utilizing Ning in distance education.
Bethany Smith & Lori Holcomb, NC State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009 (Mar 02, 2009) pp. 2970–2973
-
Student Motivation and Social Presence in Online Learning: Implications for Future Research
Hua Bai, Purdue University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2003 (2003) pp. 2714–2720
-
Social Presence and Cognitive Engagement in Online Learning Environments
Hua Bai, Purdue University, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2003 (2003) pp. 1483–1486
-
Instructor Immediacy in Synchronous e-Learning Environments
Peter Soreanu, Ort Braude Engineering College, Israel; Emil Saucan, Technion-Israel Technological Institute, Israel
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2004 (2004) pp. 3001–3005
-
Synchronous Distance Education Systems, Choosing the Right Solution?
Shauna Schullo, University of South Florida, United States; Sabine Siekmann, Gettysberg College, United States; Sally Szydlo, University of South Florida, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2003 (2003) pp. 2421–2428
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.