Experiences of Integrating Formative Feedback in an Online Educational Research Course
PROCEEDINGS
Yuliang Liu, SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY EDWARDSVILLE, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in San Diego, CA, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-78-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
According to Blignaut and Trollip (2003), there are six types of ormative feedback responses in online courses. These six response types include: Administrative, Affective, Other, Corrective, Informative, and Socratic. The first three types involve No academic content while the last three types are related to academic content. Each type serves a different purpose for online instruction and learning. This replication study involved 43 online learners in a graduate educational research course at a midwestern university in the United States in the summer semester of 2009. The study was designed to validate how the use of these six response types affected learner satisfaction and online learning in an online graduate class at a midwestern university in the United States in the summer semester of 2009. Results indicated that all six response types were required to ensure maximum online learner satisfaction and learning. Implications resulted from the study.
Citation
Liu, Y. (2010). Experiences of Integrating Formative Feedback in an Online Educational Research Course. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2010--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 645-653). San Diego, CA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 28, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/33417/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D.R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 2-15.
- Baird, D.E., & Fisher, M. (2005). Neomillennial user experience design strategies: Utilizing social networking media to support“ always on” learning styles. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 34(1), 5-32.
- Blignaut, S., & Trollip, S. (2003). Developing a taxonomy of faculty participation in asynchronous learning environments-an exploratory investigation. Computers& Education, 41, 2003, 149-172.
- Coppola, N.W., Hiltz, S.R., & Rotter, N.G. (2002). Becoming a virtual professor: Pedagogical roles and asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(4), 169-189.
- Dennen, V.P. (2005). From message posting to learning dialogues: Factors affecting learner participation in asynchronous discussion. Distance Education, 26(1), 127-148.
- Gallien, T., & Ommen-Early, J. (2008). Personalized versus collective instructor feedback in the online courseroom: Does type of feedback affect student satisfaction, academic performance and perceived connectedness with the instructor? International Journal on E-Learning, 7 (3), 463-476.
- Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23.
- Garrison, D.R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148.
- Greenberg, R. (1998). Online testing. Techniques: Making Education& Career Connections. 73(3), 109-131.
- Klecker, B. (2007). The impact of formative feedback on student learning in an online classroom. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 34(3),161-165.
- Marzano, R.J., Pickering, D.J., & Pollock, J.E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for
- McGarrell, H., & Verbeem, J. (2007). Motivating revision of drafts through formative feedback. ELT Journal, 61(3), 228-236.
- Palloff, R.M., & Pratt, K. (2003). The virtual student: A profile and guide to working with online learners. San Francisco:
- Schwartzman, R. (2007). Refining the question: How can online instruction maximize opportunities for all students? Communication Education, 56(1) 113-117.
- Shuey, S. (2002). Assessing online learning in higher education. Journal of Instruction Delivery Systems, 16(2), 13-18.
- Shute, V. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.
- Siew, P.F. (2003). Flexible online assessment and feedback for teaching linear algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 34(1), 43-51.
- Trollip, S.R., & Blignaut, A.S. (2005). Measuring faculty participation in ALN as a basis for faculty development. Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning. Http://www.unex.edu/disted/conference
- Wolsey, T.D. (2008). Efficacy of instructor feedback on written work in an online program. International Journal on ELearning, 7(2), 311-329.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References