You are here:

Perceptions of Social Loafing in Online Learning Groups: A study of Public University and U.S. Naval War College students
ARTICLE

, Florida State University ; , U.S. Naval War College, United States

IRRODL Volume 9, Number 2, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press

Full Text

Abstract

Social loafing research has spanned several decades and fields of study. Research has provided support for both the existence of social loafing and its antecedents within the laboratory, classroom, and work place. Studies regarding the perceptions of social loafing and its effects in the online learning environment, however, are largely non-existent. This study surveyed 227 online learning students who were participating in online learning groups. The study seeks to determine whether the perception of social loafing exists within online learning groups. In addition, several psychosocial factors identified in face-to-face environments are analyzed to determine their impact in online learning groups. Evidence supports both the perception of social loafing in online learning groups as well as similarities between social loafing antecedents in face-to-face groups and those in the online learning environment.

Citation

Piezon, S. & Ferree, W. (2008). Perceptions of Social Loafing in Online Learning Groups: A study of Public University and U.S. Naval War College students. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(2),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved January 22, 2020 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Adams, J.S., & Rosenbaum, W.B. (1962). The relationship of worker productivity to cognitive dissonance about wage inequities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 46(3), 161-164.
  2. Albanese, R., & Van Fleet, D.D. (1985). Rational behavior in groups: The free riding tendency. Academy of Management Review, 10(2), 244-255.
  3. Allen, J.A., & Hecht, T.D. (2004). The 'romance of teams': Toward an understanding of its psychological underpinnings and implications. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 439-461.
  4. Allport, F.H. (1924). Social psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  5. Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 6477.
  6. Becker, D., & Dwyer, M. (1998). The impact of student verbal/ visual learning style preference on implementing groupware in the classroom. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(2), 61-69. Http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v2n2/v2n2_becker.asp Black, G. (2002). Student assessment of virtual teams in an online management course. Journal of Business Administration Online, 1(2). Http://jbao.atu.edu/Fall2002/black.pdf
  7. Bradner, E. (2003). Computer mediated communication among teams: What are "teams" and how are they "virtual"? In C. Lueg & D. Fisher (Eds.), From usenet to cowebs: Interacting with social information spaces (pp. 135-154). London: Springer-Verlag.
  8. Collins, M., & Berge, Z. (1996). Facilitating interaction in computer mediated online courses. Paper presented at the FSU/ AECT Distance Education Conference, June, Tallahassee FL. Http://victorian.fortunecity.com/vangogh/555/dist-ed/roles.html
  9. Cook, R. (2001). Social psychology in project management. PM Forum: Connecting the world to project management website. Http://www.pmforum.org/library/papers/
  10. Cook, K.S., & Hegtvedt, K.A. (1983). Distributive justice, equity, and equality. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 217-241.
  11. Curtis, D.D. (2001). Exploring collaborative online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(1). Http://www.sloan-C.org/publications/jaln/v5n1/v5n1_curtis.asp Dashiell, J.F. (1930). An experimental analysis of some group effects. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 25, 190-199.
  12. Forrest, K.D., & Miller, R.L. (2003). Not another group project: Why good teachers should care about bad group experiences. Teaching of Psychology, 30(3), 244-246.
  13. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
  14. George, J.M. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic origins of perceived social loafing in organizations. The Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 191-202.
  15. Gillespie, D., Rosamond, S., & Thomas, E. (2006). Grouped out? Undergraduates’ default strategies for participating in multiple small groups. The Journal of General Education, 55(2), 81-102.
  16. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399-342.
  17. Hardy, C., & Latane, B. (1986). Social loafing on a cheering task. Social Science, 77, 165-172.
  18. Haythornthwaite, C. (2006). Facilitating collaboration in online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(1). Http://www.sloanc.org/publications/jaln/v10n1/v10n1_2haythornthwaite.asp
  19. Hiltz, S.R. (1998). Collaborative learning in asynchronous learning networks: Building learning communities. Invited Address at WEB98 Orlando, November 1998. Http://web.njit.edu/~hiltz/collaborative_learning_in_asynch.htm
  20. Hiltz, S.R., Coppola, N., Rotter, N., & Turoff, M. (1999). Measuring the importance of Collaborative learning for the effectiveness of ALN: A multi-measure, multi-method approach. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(2). Http://www.sloanc.org/publications/jaln/v4n2/v4n2_hiltz.asp
  21. Jackson, J.M., & Williams, K.D. (1985). Social loafing on difficult tasks: Working collectively can improve performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(4), 937-942.
  22. Jones, G.R. (1984). Task visibility, free riding, and shirking: Explaining the effect of structure and technology on employee behavior. Academy of Management Review, 9(4), 684-695.
  23. Kerr, N.L. (1983). Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis. Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 819-828.
  24. Kidwell, R.E., & Bennett, N. (1993). Employee propensity to withhold effort: A conceptual model to intersect three avenues of research. Academy of Management Review, 18(3), 429456.
  25. Latane, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.
  26. Lawler, E.E. (1971). Pay and organizational effectiveness: A psychological view. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  27. Leventhal, G.S., Weiss, T., & Long, G. (1969). Equity, reciprocity and reallocating rewards in the dyad. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13(4), 300-305.
  28. Liden, R.C., Wayne, S.J., Jaworski, R.A., & Bennett, N. (2004). Social loafing: A field investigation. Journal of Management, 30(2), 285-304.
  29. Mason, R. (1998). Models of online courses. ALN Magazine, 2(2). Http://www.sloanc.org/publications/magazine/v2n2/mason.asp
  30. McConnell, D. (2000). Implementing computer supported cooperative learning. London: Kogan Page.
  31. Meier, B.P., & Hinsz, V.B. (2004). A comparison of human aggression committed by groups and individuals: An interindividual-intergroup discontinuity. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 40, 551-559.
  32. Michaelsen, L.K., Fink, L.D., & Knight, A. (1997). Lessons for classroom teaching and faculty development. University of Oklahoma, Program for Instructional Innovation. Http://www.ou.edu/idp/tips/ideas/groupact.html
  33. Moede, W. (1927). Die Richtlinien der Leistungs-Psychologie [In German: Guidelines of performance psychology]. Industrielle Psychotechnik, 4, 193-209.
  34. Murphy, S.M., Wayne, S.J., Liden, R.C., & Erdogan, B. (2003). Understanding social loafing: The role of justice perceptions and exchange relationships. Human Relations, 56(1), 61-84.
  35. Naquin, C.E., & Tynan, R.O. (2003). The team halo effect: Why teams are not blamed for their failures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 332-340.
  36. Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (1999). Shedding light on lurkers in online communities. In K. Buckner (Ed.), Ethnographic studies in real and virtual environments: Inhabited information spaces and connected communities (pp. 123-128). Paper presented at the
  37. Palloff, R.M. & Pratt, K. (2003). Virtual student: A profile and guide to working with online learners. San Francisco, CA.: Jossey-Bass.
  38. Parks, C.D., & Sanna, L.J. (1999). Group performance and interaction. Boulder, CO.: Westview Press.
  39. Paulus, P.B., & VanderZee, K. (2004). Should there be a romance between teams and groups? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 475-480.
  40. Ragoonaden, K., & Bordeleau, P. (2000). Collaborative learning via the internet. Educational Technology& Society, 3(3), 1436-4522.
  41. Rovai, A.P. (2000). Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 3(4), 285-297.
  42. Salmon, G., Giles, K., & Allen, J. (1997). Large-scale computer-mediated training for management teachers. Information Research, 3(1). Http://informationr.net/ir/31/paper32.html
  43. Schlosser, A.E. (2005). Posting versus lurking: Communicating in a multiple audience context. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2), 260-265.
  44. Stacey, E. (1999). Collaborative learning in an online environment. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 14-33.
  45. Steiner, I.D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
  46. Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G.W. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(2), 151-176.
  47. Williams, K., Harkins, S., & Latane, B. (1981). Identifiability as a deterrent to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 303-311.
  48. Williams, K.D., & Karau, S.J. (1991). Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectations of co-worker performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(4), 570-581.
  49. Zajonc, R.B. (1966). Social psychology: An experimental approach. Belmont, CA.: BrooksCole.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Links