You are here:

Comparing Perceived Formal and Informal Learning in Face-to-Face versus Online Environments
ARTICLE

, , Open University of Israel, Israel

IJELLO Volume 6, Number 1, ISSN 1552-2237 Publisher: Informing Science Institute

Full Text

Abstract

Two hundred and thirty-nine elementary school teachers reported their perceived learning (cognitive and affective aspects) in four learning environments: Formal – face-to-face (teachers’ profes- sional development courses), Informal – face-to-face (teachers’ lounge), Formal – online (online teacher professional development courses), and Informal – online (teachers’ online forum). We found that perceived learning in formal learning environments was higher than in informal learning environments. The effect of communication media was also significant; teachers who communicated online reported higher perceived learning than teachers who communicated face-to-face. The interaction between formality and communication media was also significant. In the informal environments, online learners perceived their learning to be higher than face-to-face learners, whereas in formal learning environments there was no such difference. These results revealed the importance of the medium in different learning environments.

Citation

Levenberg, A. & Caspi, A. (2010). Comparing Perceived Formal and Informal Learning in Face-to-Face versus Online Environments. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 6(1), 323-333. Informing Science Institute. Retrieved August 31, 2024 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Alexander, P.A., Schallert, D.L., & Reynolds, R.E. (2009). What is learning anyway? A topographical perspective considered. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 176-192.
  2. Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N., & Mabry, E. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 83-97.
  3. Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
  4. Anderson, T. (2008). Teaching in an online learning context. In T. Anderson (Ed.), The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.) (pp. 273-326). Athabasca, AB: Athabasca University Press. Available at
  5. Ben-Peretz, M., & Schonmann, S. (2000). Behind closed doors: Teachers and the role of the teachers’ lounge. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  6. Bernard, R.M., Abrami, P.C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P.A., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A metaanalysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379-439.
  7. Billett, S. (2002). Critiquing workplace learning discourses: Participation and continuity at work Studies in the Education of Adults, 34 (1), 56-67. Retrieved 18th July, 2009, from http://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/10072/6630/1/ Blanchard, M., Grable, L., & Sharp, J. (2009). Scaffolding technology integration of middle school science and mathematics: Comparing the results of two models of teacher professional development. In I. Gibson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2009, (pp. 4015-4019). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  8. Blau, I., & Caspi, A. (2008). Do media richness and visual anonymity influence learning? A comparative study using Skype™. In Y. Eshet-Alkalai, A. Caspi, & N. Geri (Eds.), Learning in the Technological Era (pp. 18-24). Raanana, Israel: Open University of Israel. Available at http://telempub.openu.ac.il/users/chais/2008/noon/4_2.pdf
  9. Boulton-Lewis, G.M., Marton, F., Lewis, D.C., & Wills, L.A. (2000). Learning informal and informal contexts: Conceptions and strategies of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander university students. Learning and Instruction, 10, 393–414.
  10. Boyer, K.K., Olson, J.R., Calantone, R.J., & Jackson, E.C. (2002). Print versus electronic surveys: A comparison of two data collection methodologies. Journal of Operations Management, 20(4), 357-373.
  11. Candy, P.C. (2004). Linking thinking, self-directed learning in the digital age. [Report.] Department of Education, Science and Training, Australia.
  12. Cano, F. (2005). Consonance and dissonance in students’ learning experience. Learning and Instruction, 15, 201-223.
  13. Caspi, A., & Blau, I. (2008). Social presence in online discussion groups: Testing three conceptions and their relations to perceived learning. Social Psychology of Education, 11, 323-346.
  14. Caspi, A., Chajut, E., Saporta, K., & Beyth-Marom, R. (2006). The influence of personality on social participation in learning environments. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(2), 129-144.
  15. Denscombe, M. (2006). Web based questionnaires and the mode effect. An evaluation based on completion rates and data contents of near-identical questionnaires delivered in different modes. Social Science Computer Review, 24(2), 246-254.
  16. Eraut, M. (2000) Non-formal learning, implicit knowledge and tacit knowledge in professional work. In F. Coffield (Ed.), The necessity of informal learning (pp.12-31). Bristol, Policy Press in association with
  17. Freeth, D., & Reeves, S. (2004). Learning to work together: Using the presage, process, product (3P) model to highlight decisions and possibilities. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 18(1), 43-56.
  18. Ferrando, P.J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2005). IRT-related factor analytic procedures for testing the equivalence of paper-and-pencil and internet-administered questionnaires. Psychological Methods, 10(2), 193-205.
  19. Hager, P., & Halliday, J. (2006). Recovering informal learning: Wisdom, judgement and community. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  20. Heckman, R., & Annabi, H. (2005). A content analytic comparison of learning processes in online and face-to-face case study discussions. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 10(2). Retrieved 12 August, 2008, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue2/heckman.html
  21. Hoekstra, A. (2007). Experienced teachers’ informal learning in the workplace. PhD dissertation, IVLOS Institute of Education of Utrecht University, Holland. Retrieved July 21, 2008 from http://igiturarchive.library.uu.nl/dissertations/2008-0325-200845/hoekstra.pdf
  22. Jahng, N., Krug, D., & Zhang, Z. (2007). Student achievement in online distance education compared to face-to-face education. The European Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 2007-I. Retrieved July 21, 2009 from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2007/Jahng_Krug_Zhang.htm
  23. Jarvis, P. (1987) (Ed.) Twentieth century thinkers in adult education. London: Croom Helm.
  24. Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S., & Masia, B.B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: David McKay.
  25. Leung, D.Y.P. & Kember, D. (2005) Comparability of data gathered from evaluation questionnaires on paper and through the internet. Research in Higher Education 46(5), 571-591.
  26. Livingstone, D.W. (2001). Adults’ informal learning: Definitions, findings, gaps and future research. NALL Working Paper 21-2001. Retrieved July 18, 2008 from https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/retrieve/4484/21adultsinformallearning.pdf Lloyd, M.M., & Duncan Howell, J. (2009). Changing the metaphor: The potential of online communities in teacher professional development. In O. Lindberg, & A. Olofsson (Eds.), Online learning communities and teacher professional development: Methods for improved education delivery (pp. 60-76). Hershey,
  27. Lucia, S., Herrmann, L., & Killias, M. (2007). How important are interview methods and questionnaire designs in research on self-reported juvenile delinquency? An experimental comparison of Internet vs. Paper-and-pencil questionnaires and different definitions of the reference period. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3, 39-64.
  28. Marsick, V., & Watkins, K. (2001). Informal and incidental learning. In S. Merriam (Ed.), New directions for adult and continuing education (pp. 24-34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Available at
  29. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). Qualitative differences in learning: 1. Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115-127.
  30. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, Washington, D.C. Retrieved, July 2nd, 2009, from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf Olson, D.R., & Bruner, J.S. (1996). Folk psychology and folk pedagogy. In D.R. Olson& N. Torrance (Eds.), Handbook of education and human development: New models of learning, teaching, and schooling (pp. 9–27). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. Available at
  31. Rovai, A.P., Wighting, M.J., Baker, J.D., & Grooms, L.D. (2009). Development of an instrument to measure perceived cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning in traditional and virtual classroom higher education settings. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 7-13.
  32. Russell, T.L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon. Chapel Hill, NC: Office of Instructional Telecommunications, North Carolina State University.
  33. Säljö, R. (1979). Learning in the learner’s perspective: 1. Some commonsense conceptions (Tech. Rep. No. 76). Göteborg, Sweden: University of Göteborg, Department of Education.
  34. Skule, S. (2004). Learning conditions at work: A framework to understand and assess informal learning in the workplace. International Journal of Training and Development, 8(1), 8-17.
  35. Straka, G. (2002). Valuing learning outcomes acquired in non-formal settings. In W.J. Nijhjof, A. Heikkinen, & F.M. Nieuwenhuis (Eds.), Shaping flexibility in vocational education and training: Institutional, curricular and professional conditions (pp. 149-166). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  36. Zuzovsky, R., & Donitsa-Schmidt, S. (2004). Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers in Israel. OECD country background report. School of Education, Science and Technology Education Center, Tel-Aviv University. Retrieved December 22, 2008, from http://www.hakoled.org.il/webfiles/fck/teachers_israel.pdf

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Links

Also Read

Related Collections