You are here:

Effectiveness of Text-to-Speech Software Features for Improving Vocabulary, Reading Comprehension, and Reading Rate of Culturally Diverse High School Students in Hawai’i
PROCEEDINGS

, , , Center on Disability Studies, University of Hawaii at Manoa, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in San Diego, CA, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-78-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

This empirical study found that the use of text-to-speech software for more than 30 minutes per week over one academic year significantly improved vocabulary, reading comprehension, and reading rate of 14 culturally diverse high school students from Hawai`i. The audible typing function of the software was effective for enhancing subjects’ reading comprehension. Functions for changing reading speed and typing notes in a separate text file were found effective for improving subjects’ reading rate.

Citation

Roberts, K., Park, H.J. & Takahashi, K. (2010). Effectiveness of Text-to-Speech Software Features for Improving Vocabulary, Reading Comprehension, and Reading Rate of Culturally Diverse High School Students in Hawai’i. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2010--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1606-1611). San Diego, CA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 31, 2024 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Blackorby, J., & Wagner, M. (1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399-413.
  2. Coleman, M.C. (1996). Behavior disorders: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  3. Day, L. & Edwards, B. (1996). Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 486-492.
  4. Dimmitt, S., Hodapp, J., Judas, C., Munn, C., & Rachow, C. (2006). Iowa Text Reader Project impacts student achievement. Closing the Gap, 24(6), 12-13.
  5. Edyburn, D.L. (2003). Reading difficulties in the general education classroom: A taxonomy of text modification strategies. Closing the Gap, 21(6), 1, 10-13.
  6. Elkind, J. (1998). Computer reading machines for poor readers. Perspectives, 24(2), 9-14.
  7. Engstrom, E. (2005). Reading, writing, and assistive technology: An integrated developmental curriculum for college students. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 49(1), 30-39.
  8. Glaser, B.G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
  9. Golden, D. (1998). Assistive technology in special education: Policy and practice. Reston, VA: CASE/TAM.
  10. Hecker, L., Burns, L., Elkind, K., & Katz, L. (2002). Benefits of assistive reading software for students with attention disorders. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 243-272.
  11. Higgins, E., & Raskind, M. (1997). The compensatory effectiveness of optical character recognition/speech synthesis on reading comprehension of postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities, 8(2), 75-87.
  12. Lyon, G.R. (1998). Overview of reading and literacy initiatives. Retrieved April 8, 2009, from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/jeffords.htm
  13. National Center for Education Statistics (2007). The nation’s report card: Reading 2007. Retrieved September 22, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2007496 National Center for Education Statistics (2005). The nation’s report card: Reading 2005. Retrieved September 22, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2006451
  14. National Center for Education Statistics (2003). The nation’s report card: Reading 2003. Retrieved September 22, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2005453 National Center for Education Statistics (2002). The nation’s report card: Reading 2002. Retrieved September 22, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2003521
  15. National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching Children to Read. Retrieved from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrppubskey.cfm On September 22, 2008.
  16. Riviere, A. (2000). Assistive technology: Meeting the needs of adults with learning disabilities. Retrieved June 8, 2002 from, http://www.ldonline.com
  17. Stoddard, S. (1998). Chartbook on work and disability in the United States: An InfoUse report. Washington DC: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
  18. Torgesen, J.K. (1998). Catch them before the fail. American Educator, 32-41.
  19. Yelin, E., & Katz, P. (1994). Labor force trends of persons with and without disabilities. Monthly Labor Review, 117, 36-42.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read