Developing Students’ Representational Fluency Using Virtual and Physical Algebra Balances
Article
Jennifer Suh, Patricia MoyerPackenham, George Mason University, United States
JCMST Volume 26, Number 2, ISSN 07319258 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
Both virtual and physical manipulatives are reported as effective learning tools when used with different groups of students in a variety of contexts to learn mathematical content. The use of multiple representations and the flexibility to translate among those representational forms facilitates students' learning and has the potential to deepen their understanding. This classroom project involved two groups of thirdgrade students in a weeklong unit focusing on algebraic relationships. The purpose of the unit was to engage students with different algebraic models and encourage students to use informal strategies to represent their relational thinking. The paper highlights examples of these student representations as evidence of the children's developing algebraic thinking. Result from the pre and posttest measures showed that students in the physical and virtual manipulative environments gained significantly in achievement and showed flexibility in translating and representing their understanding in multiple representations: manipulative model, pictorial, numeric and word problems. The researchers recorded field notes, interviewed students, and videotaped class sessions in order to identify unique features of the learning environments. The virtual environment had unique features that promoted student thinking such as: a) explicit linking of visual and symbolic modes; b) guided stepbystep support in algorithmic processes; and c) immediate feedback and selfchecking system. In the physical environment, some unique features were: a) tactile features; b) opportunities for invented strategies; and c) mental mathematics. These results show that although the different manipulative models had different features, both the physical and virtual environments were effective in supporting students' learning and encouraging relational thinking and algebraic reasoning.
Citation
Suh, J. & MoyerPackenham, P. (2007). Developing Students’ Representational Fluency Using Virtual and Physical Algebra Balances. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 26(2), 155173. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 18, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/22799/.
© 2007 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map Balka, D.S. (1993). Making the connections in mathematics via manipulatives. Contemporary Education, 65(1), 1923.
 Borenson, H. (1997). Handson equations® learning system. Allentown, PA: Borenson and Associates.
 Clark, J.M., & Paivio, A. (1991) Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 71, 6473.
 Cramer, K. (2003). Using a translation model for curriculum development and classroom instruction. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism. Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
 Dorward, J. (2002). Intuition and research: Are they compatible. Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(6), 329332.
 Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
 Greenes, C., & Findell, C. (1999). Developing students’ algebraic reasoning abilities. In L.V. Stiff & F.R. Curico (Eds.), Developing mathematical reasoning in grades K12, 1999 yearbook. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
 Kaput, J. (1989). Linking representations in the symbol system of algebra. In C. Kieran& S.Wagner (Eds.), A research agenda for the learning and teaching of algebra. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
 Lesh, R., Landau, M., & Hamilton, E. (1983). Conceptual models in applied mathematical problem solving research. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts& Processes (pp. 263343). New York:
 Moyer, P.S., Niezgoda, D., & Stanley, J. (2005). Young children’s use of virtual manipulatives and other forms of mathematical representations. In W.J. Masalski & P.C. Elliott (Eds.), Technologysupported mathematics learning environments, 67th environments, 67th environments, 67 yearbook (pp. 1734). Reston, VA: National Council of
 Reimer, K., & Moyer, P.S. (2005). Third graders learn about fraction using virtual manipulatives: A classroom study. Journal of Computers in Math and Developing Students' Representational Fluency 173
 Rieber, L.P. (1994) Computers, graphics and learning. Madison, WI: WCB Brown& Benchmark.
 Suh, J. (2005). Third graders’ mathematics achievement and representation preference using virtual and physical manipulatives for adding fractions and balancing equations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
 Takahashi, A. (2002). Affordances of computerbased and physical geoboards in problemsolving activities in the middle grades. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign, 2002). Dissertation Abstracts International, 63(11), 3888.
 Terry, M.K. (1996). An investigation of differences in cognition when utilizing math manipulatives and math manipulative software. (Doctoral dissertation, University of MissouriSt. Louis, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts Internation DASHDASH
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesCited By
View References & Citations Map
StopMotion Animation as a Tool for Assessing Preservice Early Childhood and Elementary Teachers’ Understanding of Connections among Mathematical Representations and Computational Algorithms
Amanda Thomas & Kelley Buchheister, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2019 (Mar 18, 2019) pp. 2230–2236

The Role of Technology in Increasing Preservice Teachers’ Anticipation of Students’ Thinking in Algebra
Steve Rhine, Pacific University, United States; Rachel Harrington, Western Oregon University, United States; Brandon Olszewski, ISTE, United States
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 15, No. 2 (June 2015) pp. 85–105

Overt Physicality with Virtual Manipulatives
Seungoh Paek, University of Hawaii at Manoa, United States
ELearn: World Conference on ELearning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2015 (Oct 19, 2015) pp. 884–890

Learning Area and Perimeter with Virtual Manipulatives
Emily Bouck, Michigan State University, United States; Sara Flanagan, University of Kentucky, United States; Mary Bouck, Michigan State University, United States
Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching Vol. 34, No. 4 (October 2015) pp. 381–393

Using Online Applets to Improve Students’ Mathematical Reasoning
Mustafa Demir & Rico Reaser, University of Detroit Mercy, United States
ELearn: World Conference on ELearning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2014 (Oct 27, 2014) pp. 482–487

The Role of Technology in Increasing Preservice Teachers’ Anticipation of Students’ Thinking in Algebra
Steve Rhine, Willamette University, United States; Rachel Harrington, Western Oregon University, United States; Brandon Olszewski, ISTE, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014 (Mar 17, 2014) pp. 2298–2316

Effects of Online Math Applets on Students’ Mathematical Thinking
Mustafa Demir, University of Detroit Mercy, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014 (Mar 17, 2014) pp. 1405–1410

Using Virtual Manipulatives to Solve Cognitively Demanding Mathematical Problems
Mustafa Demir, University of Detroit Mercy, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2013 (Jun 24, 2013) pp. 2421–2426

Integration of Online Math Applets into Mathematics Instruction
Mustafa Demir, University of Detroit Mercy, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2013 (Mar 25, 2013) pp. 2070–2075

Multiple Representation Perspective and Students’ Acceptance of an Online Manipulative Tool
Serkan Ozel, Bogazici University, Turkey; Zeynep Ebrar Yetkiner, Texas A&M University, United States
ELearn: World Conference on ELearning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2010 (Oct 18, 2010) pp. 2671–2680

Preparing 8th Grade Mathematics Teachers to Use Technology, Pedagogy, and Content Knowledge in the Teaching and Learning of Algebra
Sandra Richardson, Lamar University, United States
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 9, No. 2 (June 2009) pp. 117–130
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.