Teachers and Design: A Literature Review
PROCEEDING
Melissa Warr, Punya Mishra, Arizona State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-37-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
Many scholars have used a design lens to understand teachers and teacher education. Design is changing an existing situation to a desired one; it is the process of creating something new. The literature on teachers and design is broad and describes many ways of how teachers design. In particular, the push for integrating technology into classrooms has led many to consider how teachers design curriculum and learning experiences. This paper describes a literature review of teachers and design. The authors identified the 40 most-cited publications on teachers and design published from 2007 to 2017. Further analysis revealed ten primary strands of work around teachers and design. The paper describes how the strands are related and what the research reveals about how teachers design learning experiences and uses of educational technology.
Citation
Warr, M. & Mishra, P. (2019). Teachers and Design: A Literature Review. In K. Graziano (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1265-1272). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 19, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/207806/.
© 2019 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Buchanan, R. (1998). Branzi’s dilemma: Design in contemporary culture. Design Issues, 14(1), 3–20.
- Carlgren, I. (1999). Professionalism and teachers as designers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(1), 43–56.
- Dalsgaard, P. (2014). Pragmatism and design thinking. International Journal of Design, 8(1), 143–155.
- Dawson, S., Gašević, D., Siemens, G., & Joksimovic, S. (2014). Current state and future trends: A citation network analysis of the learning analytics field. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge (pp. 231–240). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
- Fullan, M. (2013). Stratosphere: Integrating technology, pedagogy, and change knowledge. Pearson Canada.
- Golsby-Smith, T. (1996). Fourth order design: A practical perspective. Design Issues, 12(1), 5–25. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1511742*Goodyear, P., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2013). In medias res: Reframing
- Hokanson, B., & Hooper, S. (2004). Integrating technology in classrooms: We have met the enemy and he is us. In Association for Educational Communications Technology. Chicago, IL. *Holmberg, J. (2014). Studying the process of educational design– revisiting Schön and making a case for reflective design-based research on teachers’ “conversations with situations.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(3), 293–310. Https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.942748
- Kimbell, L. (2011). Rethinking design thinking: Part I. Design and Culture, 3(3), 285–306.
- Kimbell, L. (2012). Rethinking design thinking: Part II. Design and Culture, 4(2), 129–148. Https://doi.org/10.2752/175470812X13281948975413*Kirschner,P.A.(2015).Dowe need teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning? Instructional Science, 43(2), 309–322. Https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9346-9
- Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing, 32(2), 131–152.
- Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
- Schön, D.A. (1992). Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Research in Engineering Design, 3(3), 131–147.
- Simon, H.A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Tight, M. (2008). Higher education research as tribe, territory and/or community: A co-citation analysis. Higher Education, 55(5), 593–605.
- Waltman, L., van Eck, N.J., & Wouters, P. (2013). Counting publications and citations: Is more always better? Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 635–641. Https://doi.org/10.1016/J.joi.2013.04.001*Woolner,P.(2010).Thedesign of learning spaces. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
- Zuiker, S.J., Piepgrass, N., & Evans, M.D. (2017). Expanding design research: From researcher ego-systems to stakeholder ecosystems. In M.J. Spector, B.B. Lockee, & M.D. Childress (Eds.), Learning, design, and technology (pp. 1–28). Springer International Publishing. Https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_74-1*Denotespublications analyzed in literature review
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesSlides
- Teacher Design Lit Review_SITE 2019.pdf (Access with Subscription)