![](https://editlib-media.s3.amazonaws.com/sources/IJOPCD.png)
Students' Sense of Belonging in Online Classes: Does Age Matter?
ARTICLE
Jessica Decker, Valerie Beltran, University of La Verne, La Verne, CA, United States
IJOPCD Volume 6, Number 3, ISSN 2155-6873 Publisher: IGI Global
Abstract
This study explored graduate students' perceptions of their sense of belonging in online classes, their comfort in participating in online discussions, and their technology skills. Differences in these areas among three different age groups were studied. Data were gathered via an online survey. The results of the data analysis showed that students, regardless of age, felt a sense of belonging and felt comfortable communicating in the online environment. The data also revealed that older students reported feeling more comfortable interacting with their classmates and disagreeing with their classmates while still maintaining trust than their younger counterparts. Such findings inform online educators in designing classes that meet the needs of all learners.
Citation
Decker, J. & Beltran, V. (2016). Students' Sense of Belonging in Online Classes: Does Age Matter?. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 6(3), 14-25. IGI Global. Retrieved August 31, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/185696/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/changingcourse.pdf
- Bradshaw, A., & Johari, A. (2003). Effects of an online visual procedure on task completion, time, and attitude. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(4), 401–417. Doi:10.2190/0KVF-BNYT-7CPW-WWCY
- Cao, Y., & Sakchutchawan, S. (2011). Online vs. Traditional MBA: An empirical study of students’ characteristics, course satisfaction, and overall success. The Journal of Human Resources and Adult Learning, 7(2), 1–12.
- Chang, C.W. (2009). Efficacy of interaction among college students in a web-based environment. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 2(1), 17–32.
- Chyung, S.Y. (2007). Age and gender differences in online behavior, self-efficacy, and academic performance. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(3), 213–222.
- Cole, M.T., Shelley, J., & Swartz, L.B. (2014). Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A three year study. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(6), 111–131.
- DiBiase, D., & Kidwai, K. (2010). Wasted on the young? Comparing the performance and attitudes of younger and older US adults in an online class on geographic information. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 34(3), 299–326. Doi:10.1080/03098265.2010.490906
- Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87–105. Doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
- Guilbaud, P., & Jerome-D’Emilia, B. (2008). Adult instruction and online learning: Towards a systematic framework. The International Journal of Learning, 15(2), 111–122.
- Gunawardena, C.N., & Zittle, F.J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26.
- Hoskins, S.L., & Van Hooff, J.C. (2005). Motivation and ability: Which students use online learning and what influence does it have on their achievement? British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 177–192.
- Knowles, M.S. (1984). Andragogy in action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Koh, E., & Lim, J. (2012). Using online collaboration applications for group assignments: The interplay between design and human characteristics. Computers& Education, 59(2), 481–496. Doi:10.1016/J.compedu.2012.02.002
- Kranzow, J. (2013). Faculty leadership in online education: Structuring courses to impact student satisfaction and persistence. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 131–139.
- Lao, T., & Gonzales, C. (2005). Understanding online learning through a qualitative description of professors and students’ experiences. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 459–474.
- Lapointe, L., & Reisetter, M. (2008). Belonging online: Students’ perceptions of the value and efficacy of an online learning community. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(4), 641–665.
- Liu, L., & Li, W. (2012). Using an online learning management system as collaborative media to support adult learning: Needs assessment. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 135–145.
- Milheim, K.L. (2011). The role of adult education philosophy in facilitating the online classroom. Adult Learning, 22(2), 24–3. Doi:10.1177/104515951102200204InternationalJournal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design Volume 6 • Issue 3 • July-September 2016
- Moore, M.G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
- Murphy, K.L., Mahoney, S.E., Chen, C.Y., Mendoza-Diaz, N.V., & Yang, X. (2005). A constructivist model of mentoring, coaching, and facilitating online discussion. Distance Education, 26(3), 341–366.
- Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom (2nd ed.). San Francisco: John Wiley& Sons, Inc.
- Park, J., & Choi, H.J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to dropout or persist in online learning. Journal of Educational Technology& Society, 12(4), 207–217.
- Rakap, S. (2010). Impacts of learning styles and computer skills on adult students’ learning online. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 108–115.
- Ratliff, V. (2009). Are college students prepared for a technology-rich learning environment? MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 698–705.
- Richardson, J.C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68–88.
- Rogers, P., & Lea, M. (2005). Social presence in distributed group environments: The role of social identity. Behaviour& Information Technology, 24(2), 151–158. Doi:10.1080/01449290410001723472
- Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D.R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous, text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 51–70.
- Ruey, S. (2010). A case study of constructivist instructional strategies for adult online learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 706–720.
- Sahin, I., & Shelley, M. (2008). Considering students’ perceptions: The distance education student satisfaction model. Journal of Educational Technology& Society, 11(3), 216–223.
- Seiler, D. (2011). Age and learning style in the adult learner. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 7(2), 133–138.
- Seiler, D. (2012). An investigation into visualization and verbalization learning preferences in the online environment. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 8(1), 1–6.
- Simonds, T.A., & Brock, B.L. (2014). Relationship between age, experience, and student preference for types of learning activities in online courses. Journal of Educators Online, 11(1), 1–19.
- Song, L., Singleton, E.S., Hill, J.R., & Koh, M.H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 59–70. Doi:10.1016/J.iheduc.2003.11.003
- Swan, K., & Shih, L.F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115–136.
- Wallace, P., & Clariana, R. (2005). Gender differences in computer-administered versus paper-based tests. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32(2), 171–179.
- Wang, C., Shannon, D.M., & Ross, M.E. (2013). Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 302–323. Doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.835779
- Wladis, C., Conway, K.M., & Hachey, A.C. (2015). The online STEM classroom-Who succeeds? An exploration of the impact of ethnicity, gender, and non-traditional student characteristics in the community college context. Community College Review, 43(2), 142–164. Doi:10.1177/0091552115571729
- Wuebker, M.P. (2013). Adult learners: Improving persistence and performance in online learning environments. Journal of College Literacy and Learning, 39, 38–46.
- Yu, B.M., Kim, K.J., & Rho, S.Z. (2001, June). A user-analysis for web-based distance education. Paper presented at the3rd Annual Topics on Distance Learning Conference, Hammond, IN, USA.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References