
Increasing Social Presence in Online Learning through Small Group Discussions
ARTICLE
Mete Akcaoglu ; Eunbae Lee, Georgia Southern University
IRRODL Volume 17, Number 3, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press
Abstract
Social presence is a difficult to achieve, but an imperative component of online learning. In this study, we investigated the effect of group size on students' perceptions of social presence in two graduate-level online courses, comparing small group versus whole class discussions. Our results indicated that when in small group discussions, students perceived a higher level of social presence in terms of sociability, t(32) = 3.507, p = .001; social space, t(29) = 3.074, p = .005; and group cohesion, t(32) = 3.550, p = .001. We discuss how placing students in small and permanent discussion groups can augment social presence. Designers and educators of online learning can strategically modify group size to promote social presence in asynchronous online discussions.
Citation
Akcaoglu, M. & Lee, E. (2016). Increasing Social Presence in Online Learning through Small Group Discussions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved April 19, 2021 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/180460/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Abedin, B., Daneshgar, F., & D’Ambra, J. (2012). Do non-task interactions matter? The relationship between non-task sociability of computer supported collaborative learning and learning outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 385–397. Retrieved from
- AbuSeileek, A.F. (2012). The effect of computer-assisted cooperative learning methods and group size on the EFL learners’ achievement in communication skills. Computers and Education, 58(1), 231–239. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.compedu.2011.07.011
- Aragon, S.R. (2003). Creating social presence in online environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 100, 57–68. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ace.119
- Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence, 12(5), 456–480. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761270
- Burgoon, J.K., Bonito, J., Ramirez, A., Kam, K., Dunbar, N.E., & Fischer, J. (2002). Testing the interactivity principle: Effects of mediation, propinquity, and verbal and nonverbal modalities in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Communication, 52(3), 657–677. Retrieved from
- Borup, J., West, R.E., & Graham, C.R. (2012). Improving online social presence through asynchronous video. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 195–203. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.iheduc.2011.11.001
- Brandon, D.P., & Hollingshead, A.B. (1999). Collaborative learning and computer-supported groups. Communication Education, 48(2), 109–126. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379159
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Culnan, M.J., & Markus, M.L. (1987). Information technologies. In F.M. Jablin, L.L. Putnam, K.H. Roberts, & L.W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 420–443). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Dooley, K.E., & Wickersham, L.E. (2007). Distraction, domination, and disconnection in whole-class online discussions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(1), 1–8.
- Gao, Q., Dai, Y., Fan, Z., & Kang, R. (2010). Understanding factors affecting perceived sociability of social software. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1846–1861. Retrieved from
- Gunawardena, C.N., & Zittle, F.J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923649709526970
- Hackman, M.Z., & Walker, K.B. (1990) Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction. Communication Education, 39(3), 196–209. Retrieved from
- Hare, A.P. (1962). Handbook of small group research. New York, NY: The Free Press of Glencoe. Increasing Social Presence in Online Learning through Small Group Discussions Akcaoglu and Lee
- Hamann, K., Pollock, P.H., & Wilson, B.M. (2012). Assessing student perceptions of the benefits of discussions in small-group, large-class, and online learning contexts. College Teaching, 60(2), 65–75. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2011.633407
- Jaques, D., & Salmon, G. (2007). Learning in groups: A handbook for face-to-face and online environments. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Johnson, S.D., & Aragon, S.R. (2003). An instructional strategy framework for online learning environments. In S.R. Aragon (Ed.), Facilitating learning in online environments (pp. 31–43).
- Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A., Jochems, W., & Van Buuren, H. (2004). Determining sociability, social space, and social presence in (a) synchronous collaborative groups. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(2), 155–172. Retrieved from
- Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A., Jochems, W., & Van Buuren, H. (2007). Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers& Education, 49(2), 176– 192. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.compedu.2005.05.004
- Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A., & Vermeulen, M. (2013). Social aspects of CSCL environments: A research framework. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 229–242. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.750225
- Laffey, J., Lin, G.Y., & Lin, Y.M. (2006). Assessing social ability in online learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17(2), 163–177.
- Lowry, P.B., Roberts, T.L., Romano, N.C., Cheney, P.D., & Hightower, R.T. (2006). The impact of group size and social presence on small-group communication: Does computer-mediated communication make a difference? Small Group Research, 37(6), 631–661. Retrieved from
- Mayer, R.E. (2005). Principles of multimedia learning based on social cues: Personalization, voice and image principles. In R.E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 201–212). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Milliken, F.J., & Martins, L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402–433.
- Price, J.L., & Mueller, C.W. (1986). Handbook of organizational measurement. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
- Richardson, J.C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68–88.
- Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2002). Exploring social communication in computer conferencing. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(3), 259–275.
- Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D.R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous, text-based computer conferences. Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 51–70.
- Rovai, A.P. (2001). Building classroom community at a distance: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development Journal, 49(4), 33–48. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02504946
- Rovai, A.P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/79/152
- Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London, UK: John Wiley& Sons.
- Sproull, L., & Faraj, S. (1997). Atheism, sex, and databases: The net as a social technology. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the internet (pp. 35–52). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Sung, E., & Mayer, R.E. (2012). Five facets of social presence in online distance education. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1738–1747. Retrieved from
- Swan, K., & Shih, L.F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115–136.
- Tu, C.H. (2002). The measurement of social presence in an online learning environment. International Journal on E-Learning, 1(2), 34–45.
- Walther, J.B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52. Retrieved from
- Yen, C., & Tu, C. (2011). A multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis of the scores for online presence: Do they measure the same thing across cultural groups? Educational Computing Research, 44(2), 219–242. Http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/ec.44.2.e
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesCited By
View References & Citations Map-
Size Matters: An Exploratory Study of the Impact of Discussion Forum Format on Social Presence and Cognitive Presence
Valerie Barbaro, University of Minnesota, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2018 (Jun 25, 2018) pp. 2068–2074
-
Social Presence: A Scoping Review
David Mykota, Dept. of Educational Psychology & Special EducationCollege of EducationUniversity of Saskatchewan, Canada
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2018 (Mar 26, 2018) pp. 983–988
-
Increasing Social Presence in Online Learning through Small Group Discussions
Mete Akcaoglu; Eunbae Lee, Georgia Southern University
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 17, No. 3 (May 16, 2016)
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.