You are here:

An evaluation of the accessibility of top-ranking university websites: Accessibility rates from 2005 to 2015
article

,

Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning Volume 21, Number 1, ISSN 1179-7665 e-ISSN 1179-7665 Publisher: Distance Education Association of New Zealand

Full Text

Abstract

Accessibility evaluation is an important equity step in assessing effectiveness and usefulness of online learning materials for disabled students. With popular uptake of blended and online learning it is timely to evaluate the accessibility attained by universities in their websites and Learning Management Systems (LMS) .The present study considers this question for the period 2005 through 2015. Previous studies in this area have indicated that university websites have become gradually inaccessible, as the complexity of their content increases, and that the amount of attention being paid to this problem by the universities is low. This study employed a comparative quantitative method, and a random sample of universities\u2019 websites was evaluated using the accessibility evaluation tool designed by AChecker. The inclusion of the specific universities chosen for this study was based on their ranking in the world, and/or in the Oceania and Arab regions. Moreover, the evaluation is organised by page type: homepage, administration page or course description/syllabus page. Thus, through a statistical and empirical study, we demonstrated that there was no significant improvement in the accessibility of universities\u2019 web sites between 2005 and 2015. Furthermore, access to media and document files had the most influential accessibility errors. In addition, there were 27,308 (33%) total home page errors among the 180 evaluated pages from 60 of the top world, Oceania and Arab universities\u2019 sites. There are no significant differences in accessibility level between top-ranking universities in developed or developing countries. Therefore, with participation rate at universities expanding world-wide and equity being a common corporate theme there is a growing need for universities to commit to and responsibly address accessibility to online learning materials for disabled students.

Citation

Alahmadi, T. & Drew, S. (2017). An evaluation of the accessibility of top-ranking university websites: Accessibility rates from 2005 to 2015. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 21(1), 7-24. Distance Education Association of New Zealand. Retrieved March 29, 2023 from .

This record was imported from the Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning on August 9, 2017. [Original Record]

The Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning is a publication of New Zealand Association for Open, Flexible and Distance Learning (DEANZ).

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Abanumy, A., Al-Badi, A., & Mayhew, P. (2005). E-government website accessibility: In-depth evaluation of Saudi Arabia and Oman. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 3(3), 99–106.
  2. Alahmadi, T., & Drew, S. (2016). An evaluation of the accessibility of top-ranking university websites: Accessibility rates from 2005 to 2015. In DEANZ2016 Conference Proceedings (pp. 224–233). Retrieved from http://flanz.org.nz/flanzorg/wpcontent/uploads/2016/06/DEANZ16-Conference-proceedings11-April.pdf#page=224
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2012). Unmet need for formal assistance, 2012. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4433.0.55.007Main+Features12012?O PenDocument
  4. Baker, R.S., & Inventado, P.S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In J. Larusson& W. Brandon (Eds.), Learning analytics (pp. 61–75). New York: Springer.
  5. Cooper, M., Sloan, D., Kelly, B., & Lewthwaite, S. (2012, April). A challenge to web accessibility metrics and guidelines: Putting people and processes first. In Proceedings of the international cross-disciplinary conference on web accessibility (P. 20).
  6. Fichten, C.S., Jorgensen, S., Havel, A., & Barile, M. (2006). College students with disabilities: Their future and success. Montreal, Canada: Dawson College. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED491585.pdf
  7. Hackett, S., & Parmanto, B. (2005). A longitudinal evaluation of accessibility: Higher education websites. Internet Research, 15(3), 281–294.
  8. Harper, K.A., & DeWaters, J. (2008). A quest for website accessibility in higher education institutions. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3), 160–164.
  9. Jo, I.H., Yu, T., Lee, H., & Kim, Y. (2015). Relations between student online learning behavior and academic achievement in higher education: A learning analytics approach. In C. Guang, V. Kumar, R. Huang, & S. Kong (Eds.), Emerging issues in smart learning (pp. 275–287).
  10. Peña-Ayala, A. (2014). Educational data mining. Switzerland: Springer.
  11. Ringlaben, R., Bray, M., & Packard, A. (2014). Accessibility of American university special education departments’ websites. Universal Access in the Information Society, 13(2), 249– 254.
  12. ShanghaiRanking Consultancy. (2015). Academic ranking of world universities. Retrieved from http://www.shanghairanking.com/aboutus.html
  13. Vigo, M., Brown, J., & Conway, V. (2013, May). Benchmarking web accessibility evaluation tools: Measuring the harm of sole reliance on automated tests. In Proceedings of the 10th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (P. 1).
  14. WorldWide Web Consortium. (2008). Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.0.
  15. Alahmadi, T., & Drew, S. (2017). Accessibility evaluation of top-ranking university websites in world, Oceania, and Arab categories for home, admission, and course description webpages. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 21(1), [7–24.]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. 24

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Links

Also Read

Related Collections