You are here:

Using the e-learning Maturity Model to Identify Good Practice in E-Learning
PROCEEDINGS

, Victoria University of Wellington

ASCILITE - Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference, ISBN 978-1-74138-403-1 Publisher: Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education

Full Text

Abstract

E-learning is a complex endeavor which presents significant challenges as the scale and complexity of different technologies and pedagogical models grows. The e -learning Maturity Model is a quality framework aimed at helping educational institutions engage with this complexity both by understanding the state of their current organizational e -learning capability, but also by providing tools aimed at systematically improving that capability. The eMM framework includes an extensive body of information drawn from the literature but is also intended to help identify useful examples from different institutions so these can inform other organization seeking ideas for their own situation. This paper describes a numbe r of such examples of good practice identified as part of an ongoing project applying the eMM to Australian universities, and signals the potential outcomes possible from a more complete sample in the future.

Citation

Marshall, S. (2013). Using the e-learning Maturity Model to Identify Good Practice in E-Learning. In Proceedings of Electric Dreams. Proceedings ascilite 2013 Sydney (pp. 546-556). Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Retrieved June 5, 2023 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. ACODE. (2008). ACODE Benchmarks. Canberra: Australasian Council on Open, Distance and E-Learning. Http://www.acode.edu.au/projects_resources.php Allen, I.E. & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States. San Francisco: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC. Http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/
  2. Attwood, R. (2011). ‘OER University’ to Cut Cost of Degree. Times Higher Education, 10 February, 2011. Http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/415127.article Bath, D. & Bourke, J. (2010). Getting Started With Blended Learning. Brisbane: Griffith Institute for Higher Education. Http://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/267178/Getting_started_with_blended_learning_guid
  3. Chalmers D. (2007). A Review of Australian and International Quality Systems and Indicators of Learning and Teaching. Chippendale, NSW, Australia: Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education Ltd.
  4. Cormier, D. (2012). 20 Questions (and Answers) About MOOCs. Http://davecormier.com/edblog/2012/07/31/20questions-and-answers-about-moocs/ [viewed 7 Oct 2013].
  5. Daniel, J.S. (2012). Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility, Research paper. Seoul, Korea: Korean National Open University. Http://sirjohn.ca/wordpress/wpcontent/uploads/2012/08/120925MOOCspaper2.pdf [viewed 7 Oct 2013].
  6. Gibbs G. (2010) Dimensions of Quality. York, UK : Higher Education Academy.
  7. Hagel, J., Brown, J.S. & Davison, L. (2008). Shaping Strategy in a World of Constant Disruption. Harvard Business Review, October 2008, 1-11.
  8. Hamel, G. & Välikangas, L. (2003). The Quest for Resilience. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 52–63.
  9. Hénard F. (2010) Learning Our Lesson: Review of Quality Teaching in Higher Education. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  10. Koch, J.V. (2003). TQM: Why is Its Impact in Higher Education So Small? The TQM Magazine 15(5): 325-333.
  11. Law D.C.S. (2010) Quality assurance in post-secondary education: some common approaches. Quality Assurance in Education 18: 64–77.
  12. Marginson, S. & Considine, M. (2000). The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Marshall, S. (2006a). EMM Version Two Process Assessment Workbook. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington. Report to the New Zealand Ministry of Education. 83pp. Http://www.utdc.vuw.ac.nz/research/emm/documents/versiontwo/20060726Workbook.pdf Marshall, S. (2006b). EMM Version Two Process Descriptions. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington. Report to the New Zealand Ministry of Education. 157pp. Http://www.utdc.vuw.ac.nz/research/emm/documents/versiontwo/20060726Pro cessDescriptions.pdf
  13. Marshall, S. (2009). Crossing the ditch: Applying the e-learning Maturity Model to Australian institutions. In Same places, different spaces. Proceedings ascilite Auckland 2009. Http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/auckland09/procs/marshall.pdf Marshall, S. (2010). A Quality Framework for Continuous Improvement of E-Learning: The E-Learning Maturity Model. Journal of Distance Education, 24(1), 143-166.
  14. Marshall, S. (2013). Evaluating the Strategic and Leadership Challenges of MOOCs. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 9(2): 216-227. Http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/marshall_0613.pdf
  15. Milne, J. & Dimock, E. (2006). E-Learning Guidelines: Guidelines for the Support of E-Learning in New Zealand Tertiary Institutions. Palmerston North: Massey University.
  16. Neal, T. & Marshall, S. (2008). Report on the Distance and Flexible Education Capability Assessment of the New Zealand ITP Sector. Report to the New Zealand Tertiary Education Committee and Institutes of Technology and Polytechnics Distance and Flexible Education Steering Group. Http://www.tec.govt.nz/Documents/Reports%20and%20other%20documents/distance-and-flexibleeducation-capability.pdf
  17. Quinn, A., Lemay, G., Larsen, P. & Johnson, D.M (2009). Service Quality in Higher Education. Total Quality Management& Business Excellence 20(2): 139-152.
  18. Schalken, L. (2012). RMIT Business& ICT Maxims v1.01. Melbourne: RMIT University. Http://mams.rmit.edu.au/v6l0do8xzgro1.doc Sero. (2007). Baseline Study of E-activity in Scotland’s Colleges. Http://www.sfc.ac.uk/web/FILES/
  19. Sporn, B. (1999). Adaptive University Structures: An Analysis of Adaptation to Socioeconomic Environments of US and European Universities. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.
  20. Stallman, R. (2002). Free Software Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman 30th ascilite Conference 2013 Proceedings

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Links