You are here:

Scoring for Preservice Teachers’ Electronic Portfolios: Issues of Feasibility and Reliability
PROCEEDINGS

, , Lehigh Univ., United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Norfolk, VA ISBN 978-1-880094-41-9 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

This paper is a progress report on a pilot study investigating the creation of an impartial, reliable, and feasible method of scoring preservice teachers' electronic portfolios. Participants include four preservice teachers participating in intern teaching and the accompanying weekly seminar. Required portfolio components were developed to demonstrate competency of the INTASC standards. A four-point analytic rubric was created, which provides sub-scores on thirteen portfolio components and one overall portfolio score. Two faculty raters were trained and scored each portfolio. Each portfolio was also self-assessed by its creator and peer-assessed by another intern in the class. Quantitative results include interrater reliabilities of faculty, self, and peer ratings. Qualitative outcomes were studied through open-ended surveys of participants and raters.

Citation

Derham, C. & Bodzin, A. (2001). Scoring for Preservice Teachers’ Electronic Portfolios: Issues of Feasibility and Reliability. In J. Price, D. Willis, N. Davis & J. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2001--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1919-1923). Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 28, 2024 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References