Utilizing Geo-Referenced Mobile Game Technology for Universally Accessible Virtual Geology Field Trips
ARTICLE
Natalie Bursztyn, Joel Pederson, Brett Shelton, Andrew Walker, Todd Campbell
IJEMST Volume 3, Number 2,
Abstract
Declining interest and low persistence is well documented among undergraduate students in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math in the United States. For geoscience, field trips are important attractors to students, however with high enrollment courses and increasing costs they are becoming rare. We propose in this concept paper that the contextualized learning and engagement of field trips can be simulated by virtual field trips for smart mobile devices. Our focus is on utilizing the geo-referencing capabilities of smart devices within spatially scaled educational games. This technology is increasingly ubiquitous amongst undergraduate students, and consequently is an untapped pedagogical resource. The objective of our games is to give students real-world experience in selected fundamental principles of geology. Set in Grand Canyon, each module features images of exceptional geologic sites illustrating these principles. Students navigate "downstream" using their devices' GPS and complete at least one interactive activity per location to progress to the next point. Student response to a pilot game suggests that this indeed is a viable method for making geoscience instruction engaging and enjoyable, and hopefully will result in greater motivation to pursue the geosciences.
Citation
Bursztyn, N., Pederson, J., Shelton, B., Walker, A. & Campbell, T. (2015). Utilizing Geo-Referenced Mobile Game Technology for Universally Accessible Virtual Geology Field Trips. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 3(2), 93-100. Retrieved March 27, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/157736/.
ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.
Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Ashby, C. (2006). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Trends and the role of federal programs. Testimony before the Committee on Education and the Workforce, House of Representatives. Http://republicans.edlabor.house.gov/archive/hearings/109th/fc/competitiveness050306/ashby.htm.
- Campbell, T., Wang, S., Hsu, H.-Y., Duffy, A., & Wolf, P. (2010). Learning with web tools, simulations, and other technologies in science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(5), 505– 100 Bursztyn, Pederson, Shelton, Walker& Campbell
- Clough, G., Jones, A.C., McAndrew, P., and Scanlon, E. (2008). Informal learning with PDAs and smartphones. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 359-371.
- Dahlstrom, E., de Boor, T., Grunwald, P., & Vockley, M. (2011). The ECAR National Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology. Research Report. EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research: Boulder, CO. Http://www.educause.edu/ecar. Accessed 16 May 2012.
- Fairweather, J. (2010). Linking Evidence and Promising Practices in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Undergraduate Education: A Status Report for The National Academies National Research Council Board of Science Education (BOSE). BOSE, Washington, DC; www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/Fairweather_Commissioned-Paper.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2012.
- Fuller, I.C. (2006). What is the value of fieldwork? Answers from New Zealand using two contrasting undergraduate physical geography fieldtrips. New Zealand Geographer, 62, 215–220.
- Gobert, J.D. (2005). The effects of different learning tasks on model-building in plate tectonics: diagramming versus explaining. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 444-455.
- Gobert, J.D. & Clement, J.J. (1999). Effects of student-generated diagrams versus student-generated summaries on conceptual understanding of causal and dynamic knowledge in plate tectonics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 39-53.
- Johnson, Z.I. & Johnston, D.W. (2013). Smartphones: powerful tools for geoscience education. Eos, 94(47), 433-456. Kastens, K.A., Manduca, C.A., Cervato, C., Frodeman, R., Goodwin, C., Liben, L.S., Mogk, D.W., Spangler,
- T.C., Stillings, N.A., & Titus, S. (2009). How geoscientists think and learn. Eos, 90(31), 265–272.
- Klopfer, E., Squire, Lk, & Jenkins, H. (2003). Augmented reality simulations on PDAs. Paper presented at the 2003 American Education Research Association (AERA) Conference, Chicago, IL.
- McGreen, N. & Arnedillo Sánchez, I. (2005). Mapping challenge: A case study in the use of mobile phones in collaborative, contextual learning. Short paper in IADIS International Conference Mobile Learning. Qawra, Malta.
- National Higher Education ICT Initiative (2007). Succeeding in the 21st century: What higher education must do to address the gap in Information and Communication Technology proficiencies. Research Report. Educational Testing Service. Http://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/ Information_and_Communication_
- Perlmutter, D.D. (2011). Bridging the Generational Tech Gap. News article. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Http://chronicle.com/article/Bridging-the-Generational-Tech/128304/ Accessed 25 April 2012.
- Seymour, E. (2001). Tracking the processes of change in U.S. Undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Science Education, 86, 79-105.
- Shelton, B.E., Parlin, M.A., Jump, V., & Rowan, L. (2012). Iterative technology-based design with deaf/hard of hearing populations: Working with teachers to build a better educational game. Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2012), Sydney, Australia.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References