You are here:

An E-portfolio System to Promote Development of Gaming Instructional Materials for Cultivating Students’ Problem-solving Abilities
PROCEEDINGS

, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Kona, Hawaii, United States Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Full Text

Abstract

This research examines ways to support efficient development of gaming instructional materials based on Figure 1 in each subject area. The basic policy of support is to offer basic dialog templates and sample gaming materials, and prompt their usage. This policy will help a developer to focus on considering contents of dialog rather than writing the program for controlling dialog. In this research, graduate students will be the main developers of gaming materials while learning techniques of instructional design, and cultivating their ability to perform problem solving along with Figure 1. For this end, I design an e-portfolio system as a support system to record processes of developing games, evaluate them collaboratively, share them and result of trial lessons with use them.

Citation

Matsuda, T. (2015). An E-portfolio System to Promote Development of Gaming Instructional Materials for Cultivating Students’ Problem-solving Abilities. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1142-1149). Kona, Hawaii, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 31, 2024 from .

© 2015 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Bruer, J.T. (1991) Schools for Though: A Science of Learning in the Classroom. The MIT Press.
  2. Ito, Y. And Matsuda, T. (2014). Improving the Design Framework of Problem-Based Instruction in Mathematics Based on the Student Model, Proceedings of the 12th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Education (pp. 2517–2529), Hawaii International Conference on Education: Honolulu, HI.
  3. Katto, Y., Matsuda, T., and Endo, S. (2013). Considering Science and Technology Communication Literacy for All and Developing an E-learning Material to Cultivate it. Technical Report of Japan Society for Educational Technology, JSET13 (2), 1–8.
  4. Keller, J.M. (1987) Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10 (3), 2–10.
  5. Matsuda, T. (2003). “Informatical and Systematical Thinking” on Information Studies Focused on Cultivating “Informatical and Systematical Thinking.” High School Information Education Society of Tokyo, 1, 44–47.
  6. Matsuda, T. (2005) Instructional Activities Game: a Tool for Teacher Training and Research into Teaching. In Shiratori, R., Arai, K., and Kato, F. (Eds.) Gaming Simulations and Society: Research Scope and Perspective. Springer-Verlag, 91–100.
  7. Matsuda T. (2012) Design Principles and Ethical Issues of Gaming Instructional Materials: Unifying the Views of Educational Technology and Simulation and Gaming, Studies of Simulation and Gaming, 22(Special), 16–24.
  8. Matsuda T. (2013) Designing a Student Model for Developing E-learning Materials and Virtual Lesson Games for STEM Education, In P J. Williams and D. Gedera (Eds.) Technology Education for the Future: A Play on Sustainability, 325–331
  9. Matsuda, T. (2014). Improving the Design Framework of E-learning Game Materials for Information Studies: Consideration of a Student Model, Proceedings of the 12th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Education (pp. 2129 –2141), Hawaii International Conference on Education: Honolulu, HI.
  10. Matsuda, T. (2015). Design Framework of Gaming Materials to Cultivate Problem-solving Abilities: Differences and Commonalities within STEM Education, Proceedings of the 13th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Education (pp. 2147-2159), Hawaii International Conference on Education: Honolulu, HI.
  11. Murai, M. (1987). Is Morality Possible to Teach? Logic of Moral Education. Tokyo: Shogakukan.
  12. National Institute of Educational Policy Research (2014). Basic Principles of Curriculum Development for Cultivating Qualification and Abilities Corresponding to Changes in Society (Revised edition). Tokyo: National Institute of Educational Policy Research.
  13. Schank, R.C., Berman, T.R. & Macpherson, K.A. (1999) LearningbyDoing. In Reigeluth, C.M. (Ed.) Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory (Volume II). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 161–181.
  14. Tamada, K. And Matsuda, T. (2004). Development of the Instruction Method of Information Morals by “The Combination of Three Types of Knowledge.” Japan Journal of Educational Technology, 28 (2), 79–88.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections