#
Mathematics-for-Teachers using a MOOC
PROCEEDINGS

## George Gadanidis, Faculty of Education, University of Western Ontario, Canada

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Jacksonville, Florida, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-07-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

## Abstract

What mathematics experiences and knowledge do elementary teachers need and how might these be provided through a MOOC? While online courses have been part of the educational landscape for a couple of decades, MOOCs offer two innovations. First, a MOOC is open. Second, a MOOC is massive. In this paper I discuss the design, development and implementation of a mathematics-for-teachers MOOC, with specific focus on the five elements that were brought together to create the mathematics-for-teachers MOOC experience: (1) the instructional model, (2) the documentaries from classrooms showing students engaging with the same activities as the teachers, (3) the simulations and interactive explorations of concepts used to enhance conceptual insight and surprise, (4) the use of artistic and musical forms of communication, and (5) the nature of the discussion facilitated.

## Citation

Gadanidis, G. (2014). Mathematics-for-Teachers using a MOOC. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2014--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 310-314). Jacksonville, Florida, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 31, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/130763/.

© 2014 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

## References

View References & Citations Map- Ardis, M.A., & Henderson, P.B. (2012). Software Engineering Education: Is Software Engineering Ready for MOOCs? ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 37 (5), 14. .
- Ball, D.L. (2003). Mathematics in the 21st Century: What mathematical knowledge is needed for teaching mathematics? Secretary’s Summit on Mathematics, U.S. Department of Education, February 6, 2003; Washington, D.C. Retrieved 11 October 2007 from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/progs/mathscience/ball.html
- Ball D. & Bass. H. (2002). Towards a practice based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Proceedings of the 2002 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group (P. 3-14). Kingston, Ontario:
- Boorstin, J. (1990). The Hollywood eye: What makes movies work. NY: Harper Collins Publishers.
- Cormier, D. & Siemens, G. (2010). Through the Open Door: Open Courses as Research, Learning, and Engagement. //Educause Review, July/August//, 31-39.
- Devlin, K. (2013). The MOOC will soon die. Ling live the MOOR. MOOCtalk. Http://mooctalk.org/ Eisner, E.W. (1997) The Promise and Perils of Alternative Forms of Data Representation. Educational Researcher, 26(6), 4-10.
- Gadanidis, G. (2012). Why can't I be a mathematician? For the Learning of Mathematics, 32(2), 20-26.
- Gadanidis, G. & Borba, M. (2008). Our lives as performance mathematicians. For the Learning of Mathematics, 28(1), 42-49.
- Gadanidis, G., Hughes, J. & Borba, M. (2008). Students as performance mathematicians. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14(3), 168-175.
- Gadanidis, G. & Hughes, J. (2011). Performing big math ideas across the grades. Teaching Children Mathematics, 17(8), 486-496.
- Gadanidis, G. & Namukasa, I. (2005). Math therapy. The Fifteenth ICMI Study: The Professional Education and Development of Teachers of Mathematics, State University of Sao Paolo at Rio Claro, Brazil, 15-21 May 2005. Retrieved 11 October 2007 from http://stwww.weizmann.ac.il/G-math/ICMI/log_in.html
- Gadanidis, G. & Namukasa, I. (2007). Mathematics-for-teachers (and students). Journal of Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 13-22.
- Gadanidis, G. & Namukasa, I. (2009). A critical reflection on mathematics-for-teaching (Uma refl exão crítica sobre a matemática-para-o-ensino). Acta Scientiae, 11(1), 21-30.
- Glesne, C. (2010) Becoming Qualitative Researchers: an introduction (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
- Kop, R. (2011). The Challenges to Connectivist Learning on Open Online Networks: Learning Experiences during a Massive Open Online Course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 12(3), 19-38.
- Mak, S.F.J., Williams, R., & Mackness, J. (2010). Blogs and forums as communication and Learning tools in a MOOC. In, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning 2010 (pp.275-284).
- McFedries, P. (2011). I’m in the Mood for MOOCs. IEEE Spectrum, 49(12), c1. .
- Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
- Suleski, J. & Ibaraki, M. (2010) Scientists are talking, but mostly to each other: a quantitative analysis of research represented in mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 19 (1), 115–125.
- Tschofen, C., & Mackness, J. (2012). Connectivism and Dimensions of Individual Experience. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13 (1), 124-143.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References