Is It Fully ‘On’ or Partly ‘Off’? The Case of Fully-Online Provision of Transnational Education
ARTICLE
Iwona Miliszewska, Victoria University, Australia
JITE-Research Volume 6, Number 1, ISSN 1539-3585 Publisher: Informing Science Institute
Abstract
With the rapid expansion of the transnational education market, more and more universities join the ranks of transnational education providers or expand their transnational education offerings. Many of those providers regard fully-online provision of their programs as an economic alternative to face-to-face teaching. Do transnational students accept this model as a viable and effective educational alternative? A recent research study investigated students’ attitudes towards fully-online provision of computing education programs in one of the most important Australian transnational education markets: Hong Kong. Of interest were students’ perceptions about the suitability of fully-online mode of teaching and learning with respect to computing studies, and their views on the importance of face-to-face interaction in their programs. Students from three transnational computing programs, offered in Hong Kong by Australian universities in co-operation with Hong Kong partners, participated in the study; the programs are delivered in face-to-face sessions and rely on the Internet for support and communication (unit Web sites, bulletin boards, email, etc.). The rationale behind the choice of locale and participants for the study was threefold: first, Hong Kong is one of the largest Australian transnational education markets (hence, the results of the study would be of importance); second, it is a well-developed territory where English is commonly spoken (hence, participants would not be biased towards online education because of lack of suitable technological infrastructure or inadequate linguistic skills); and thirdly, computing students were technology savvy and, therefore, would not be biased in their views of online education because of technophobia. Approximately three hundred students participated in the study, which was based on analysis of data collected though a survey and group interviews with students. Results from the survey revealed that students did not regard fully-online provision of transnational programs as a preferred alternative to the current model – that is one that is based on face-to-face communication and uses the Internet for support. Their opposition was pronounced and ranged from total rejection of fully-online provision in one of the programs (100% of students against the idea), to marginal support of fully-online provision from students in the other two programs (9% and 13% respectively). Students repeatedly stated the importance of face-to-face communication as the most important reason for preferring the current program model. The subsequent group interviews with students sought to explore further the reasons behind the students’ views. Students again responded in favor of the current model of the programs reiterating the importance of face-to-face interaction. They regarded face-to-face communication as more conducive to the learning process, affording better opportunity to sharing knowledge and asking for help, “easier” and more interactive, and more compatible with the needs of Hong Kong students. However, the respondents acknowledged the usefulness of the Internet as a means for providing course material, facilitating submission of assignments, and enabling communication with lecturers outside classes. The findings of the study endorse the current trends of Australian transnational education in South East Asia and support the prediction that Web-supported face-to-face delivery is likely to continue as a principal model of transnational tertiary education programs.
Citation
Miliszewska, I. (2007). Is It Fully ‘On’ or Partly ‘Off’? The Case of Fully-Online Provision of Transnational Education. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 6(1), 499-514. Informing Science Institute. Retrieved August 31, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/111435/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Arbaugh, J.B. (2004). Learning to learn online: A study of perceptual changes between multiple online course experiences. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(3), 169-182.
- Chapman, A., & Pyvis, D. (2006). Quality, identity and practice in offshore university programmes: Issues in the internationalization of Australian higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(2), 233245.
- Chase, M., Macfadyen, L.P., Reeder, K., & Roche, J. (2002). Intercultural challenges in networked learning: Hard technologies meet soft skill. First Monday, 7(8). Retrieved November 2007 from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_8/chase/index.html
- Chen, L. (1997). Distance delivery systems in terms of pedagogical considerations: A revolution. Educational Technology, 37(4), 34-37.
- Curran, K. (2002). A web-based collaboration teaching environment. IEEE Multimedia, 9(3), 72-76.
- Debowski, S. (2003). Lost in internationalised space: The challenge of sustaining academics teaching offshore. 17th IDP Australian International Education Conference, Securing the future for international education. Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved August 2004 from http://www.idp.com/17aiecpapers
- Evans, T., & Tregenza, K. (2002). Academics’ experiences of teaching Australian ‘non-local’ courses in Hong Kong. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Crossing borders: New frontiers for educational research. Brisbane, Australia. Retrieved February 2006 from http://www.aare.edu.au/02pap/eva02510.htm
- Gong, W., Li, Z.G., & Stump, R.L. (2007). Global internet use and access: cultural considerations. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 19(1), 57-74.
- Hedberg, J.G., & Brown, I. (2002). Understanding cross-cultural meaning through visual media. Educational Media International, 39(1), 23-30.
- Hentea, M., Shea, M.J., & Pennington, L. (2003). A perspective on fulfilling the expectations of distance education. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on information technology education (CITC4 2003), 160-167. Lafayette, Indiana, USA, October 16-18, 2003. ACM Press, New York.
- Herrmann, A., Downie, J., & O’Connell, B. (2001). Assessing and evaluating student contribution to electronic discussions. Australian Electronic Journal of Nursing Education, 7(1). Retrieved October 2005 from http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/nhcp/aejne/archive/vol7-1/refereed/oconnell.html
- Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 301-320
- Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
- Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). USA: Sage Publications.
- Hong Kong Government. (1996). Non-local higher and professional education (regulation) ordinance.
- Huang, F. (2003). Transnational higher education: A perspective from China. Higher Education Research and Development, 22(2), 193-203.
- Huang, S., & Hu, H. (2000). Integrating windows streaming media technologies into a virtual classroom environment. IEEE Transactions on Education, 38(2), 411-418.
- IDP Education Australia. (2000). Transnational education providers, partners and policy: Challenges for Australian institutions offshore. D. Davis, A. Olsen & A. Böhm (Eds.). IDP: Canberra.
- IDP Education Australia. (2004). International students in Australian universities. Report, semester 2, 2004. IDP: Canberra. Retrieved March 2006 from http://www.idp.com/research/fastfacts/Semester%20Two%202004%20%20Key%20Outcomes_Web.pdf
- Jones, G.R. (2002). [Opening remarks.] Global Alliance for Transnational Education (GATE) Conference. Paris: France, 18-20 September, 2002. Retrieved November 2002 from http://www.edugate.org/conferences/powerpoints/Jones/Jones%20Speech.pdf
- MiliszewskaKhalifa, M., & Lam, R. (2002). Web-based learning: effects on learning process and outcome. IEEE Transactions on Education, 45(4), 350-356.
- Kinshuk, & Yang, A. (2003). Web-based asynchronous synchronous environment for online learning. United States Distance Education Association Journal, 17(2), 5–17.
- Kirkup, G., & Jones, A. (1996). New technologies for open learning: The superhighway to the learning society? In P. Raggatt, R. Edwards, & N. Small (Eds.), Adult learners, education and training 2: The learning society – challenges and trends (pp.272-291). London: Routledge.
- Kiser, K. (2002). Is blended best? E-Learning, 3(6), 10.
- Knipe, D. (2002). The quality of teaching and learning via videoconferencing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 301-311.
- Kum, L.C., Chang, V., & Bauer, C. (2000). The use of web-based learning in culturally diverse learning environments. Proceedings of the Sixth Australian World Wide Web Conference, Cairns, 12-17 June 2000. Retrieved November 2007 from http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw2k/papers/chin/paper.html
- Lee, J., Ng, L.H., & Ng, L.L. (2002). An analysis of students’ preparation for the virtual learning environment. Internet and Higher Education, 4, 231-242.
- Marginson, S. (2002). The phenomenal rise of international degrees Down Under. Change, 34(3), 34-43. Retrieved September 2005 from http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1254/is_3_34/ai_85465152
- Marold, K., & Haga, W. (2003). The emerging profile of the on-line learner: Relating course performance with pretests, GPA, and other measures of achievement. Proceedings of the Information Resource Management Association (IRMA) Conference (pp. 248-251). Idea Group Publishing,
- Marold, K., & Haga, W. (2004). Measuring online students’ ability to apply programming theory: Are Web courses really working? Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 13(1), 1320.
- Marold, K., Larsen, G., & Moreno, A. (2000). Web-based learning: Is it working? Challenges of information technology management in the 21st Century (pp. 350-353). Idea Group Publishing. Hershey, PA.
- McBurnie, G., & Pollock, A. (2000). Opportunity and risk in transnational education – Issue in planning for international campus development: An Australian perspective. Higher Education in Europe, 25(3), 333-343.
- Mercado, S., Parboteeah, K.P., & Zhao, Y. (2004). On-line course design and delivery: cross-national considerations. Strategic Change, 13(4), 183-192.
- Moore, M.G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.). Toronto, Canada: Wadsworth.
- Munro-Smith, N. (2002). A tale of two cities: Computer-mediated teaching and learning in Melbourne and Singapore. ASCILITE Conference, Auckland, New Zealand. Retrieved November 2007 from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/auckland02/proceedings/papers/105.pdf
- Oliver, R. (2000). Creating meaningful contexts for learning in web-based settings. In Open Learning, 6-8 December 2000, Brisbane Convention & Exhibition Centre, Queensland 2000 (pp. 53-61). Brisbane:
- Riffee, W.R. (2003). Putting a face on distance education programs. Syllabus, February, 10-13. Retrieved March 2006 from http://www.campus-technology.com/article.asp?id=7233
- Singh, M., & Han, J. (2005). Globalizing flexible work in universities: Socio-technical dilemmas in internationalizing education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 6(1). Retrieved March 2006 from: http://www.irrodl.org/content/v6.1/singh_han.html
- UNESCO & Council of Europe. (2001). Code of good practice in the provision of transnational education. Bucharest: UNESCO-CEPES. Retrieved June 2002, from http://www.cepes.ro/hed/recogn/groups/transnat/code.htm
- Van der Vende, M.C. (2003). Globalisation and access to higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 7(2), 193-206.
- Wang, H. (2006). Teaching Asian students online: What matters and why? PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 15, 69-84.
- Wong, J.K.K. (2004). Are the learning styles of Asian international students culturally or contextually biased? International Educational Journal, 4(4), 154-166.
- Wyatt, S. (2001). Crossing the boundaries: Overcoming borders and understanding languages. Western Cooperative of Educational Telecommunications (WCET) 13th Annual Conference. Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, Oct 2001. Retrieved November 2002 from http://www.wiche.edu/telecom/events/conference/2001/Presentations/Scott%20Wyatt.ppt
- Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Yan, B., Lai, C., & Tan, H.S. (2005). What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1836-1884.
- Zhu, Z.T., Gu, X.P., & Wang, Q.Y. (2003). A panorama of online education in China. Educational Technology, 23-27.
- Ziguras, C. (2000). New frontiers, new technologies, new pedagogies. Educational technology and the internationalisation of higher education in South East Asia. Monash Centre for Research in International Education: Melbourne.
- Ziguras, C. (2002). Education beyond our shores: Defining the way forward. Workshop report. International Policy & Development Unit, Strategic Information and Resourcing Division, New Zealand Ministry of Education. October 2002. Retrieved September 2004 from http://www.minedu.govt.nz/web/downloadable/dl7382_v1/workshop-report-final.doc
- Ziguras, C., & Rizvi, F. (2001). Future directions in international online education. In D. Davis & D. Meares (Eds), Transnational Education: Australia Online (pp. 151-164). Sydney: IDP Education Australia.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References