You are here:

Recognizing (Almost) Invisible Gender Bias in Technology Use and Teacher-Student Interactions
PROCEEDINGS

, Arizona State University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Phoenix, AZ, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-55-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

This paper examines my role as teacher/researcher in perpetuating or trying to eliminate gender bias from my interactions with elementary school students. This descriptive study of a teacher/researcher interacting with students analyzes naturalistic data to answer the question, "How does a teacher/researcher perpetuate or disallow differential treatment of the students based on gender considerations?" Data included extensive email messages between myself and the students and video recordings of classroom interactions. Analysis of the data indicated that gender biases are more invisible and more difficult to eliminate than expected. Even in a classroom firmly grounded in feminist pedagogy, gender bias was almost impossible to eliminate. A feminist perspective informed the analysis.

Citation

Christie, A. (2005). Recognizing (Almost) Invisible Gender Bias in Technology Use and Teacher-Student Interactions. In C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, I. Gibson, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2005--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 742-749). Phoenix, AZ, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved May 10, 2021 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. American Association of University Women. (1992). How schools shortchange girls: The AAUW report. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.
  2. Chapman, A. (2003). Gender Bias in Education. Retrieved December 30, 2004 from[ http://www.edchange.org/multicultural/papers/genderbias.html ].
  3. Jones, K. (2000). Gender Equity Training and Teacher Behavior. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 3, 27.
  4. Krupnick, C. (1985). Men in the classroom: Inequalities and its remedies. Teaching and Learning: Journal of the Harvard Danforth Center, 1, 18-25.
  5. Morse, F.K., & Daiute, C. (1992, April). I LIKE computers vs. I LIKERT computers: Rethinking methods for assessing the gender gap in computing (Research Rep. No. ED 349 939). American Educational Research Association Conference, San Francisco.
  6. Sadker, D. (1999). Gender Equity: Still Knocking at the Classroom Door. Educational Leadership, 56(7): 22-6
  7. Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1986). Sexism in the classroom: From grade school to graduate school. Phi Delta Kappan, 67(7), 512-515.
  8. Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How our schools cheat girls. New York: Simon& Schuster.
  9. Serbin, L., & O’Leary, D. (1975, July). How nursery schools teach girls to shut up. Psychology Today, 56-58, 102103.
  10. Spender, D. (1982). Invisible women: The school scandal. London: The Women’s Press.
  11. Walkerdine, V. (1990). Schoolgirl fictions. London: Verso.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References