You are here:

How Low-Income Children Use the Internet at Home
Article

, , , , , , Michigan State University, United States

Journal of Interactive Learning Research Volume 16, Number 3, ISSN 1093-023X Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

"** Invited as a paper from ED-MEDIA 2004 **" HomeNetToo is a longitudinal field study designed to examine home Internet use by low-income families in the United States. Participants were 140 children, mostly African American, whose Internet use was continuously and automatically recorded for one year. This article focuses on relationships between children's main computer activities, academic interests, career aspirations, social engagement, and their Internet use. Results indicated that children used their computers mainly to play games and search the Web. Using the computer to listen to music or to e-mail was related to greater Internet use whereas using it for schoolwork was related to less Internet use. Children whose academic interest was social science used the Internet more than did children whose interest was mathematics or science. Children who aspired to careers in the professions or computing used the Internet more than did children who aspired to careers in sports, entertainment, or human services. Internet use was unrelated to social engagement. Academic performance could not explain relationships between main computer activity, academic interest, career aspirations, and Internet use. Implications for research on children's beliefs about the Internet and their influence on Internet and technology use are discussed.

Citation

Jackson, L., von Eye, A., Biocca, F., Barbatsis, G., Zhao, Y. & Fitzgerald, H. (2005). How Low-Income Children Use the Internet at Home. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(3), 259-271. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 27, 2023 from .

© 2005 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Becker, H.J. (2000). Who’s wired and who’s not? Children’s access to and use of computer technology. The Future of Children. Children and computer technology, 10(2), 44-75. Retrieved May 8, 2005, from http://www.futureofchildren.org
  2. Cho, J., Gil de Zuniga, H., Rojas, H., & Shah, D.V. (2003). Beyond access: The digital divide and Internet uses and gratifications. IT & Society, 1(4), 46-72. Retrieved May 8, 2005 from http://www.ItandSociety.org
  3. Facer, K., & Furlong, R. (2001). Beyond the myth of the ‘cyberkid’: Young people at the margins of the information revolution. Journal of Youth Studies, 4, 451-469.
  4. Gorski, P. (2002, Fall). Dismantling the digital divide: A multicultural education framework. Multicultural Education, 10, 28-30.
  5. Jackson, L.A. (2004). Gender and computing. In W.S. Bainbridge (Ed.), Encyclopedia of humancomputer interaction. Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire Publishing.
  6. Jackson, L.A., Biocca, F., von Eye, A., Barbatsis, G., Zhao, Y., & Fitzgerald, H.E. (2004, June). Children's Internet use: Findings from the HomeNetToo project. Proceedings of ED-MEDIA, World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Lugano, Switzerland. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. Jackson, L.A., von Eye, A., Barbatsis, G., Biocca, F., Fitzgerald, H.E., & Zhao, Y. (2004). The social impact of Internet use on the other side of the digital divide. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 47(7), 43-47.
  7. Jackson, L.A., vonEye, A., Biocca, F., Zhao, Y., Barbatsis, G., & Fitzgerald, H.E. (2004,
  8. Jackson, L.A., Barbatsis, G., von Eye, A., Biocca, F.A., Zhao, Y., & Fitzgerald, H.E. (2003). Implications for the digital divide of Internet use in low-income families. IT & Society, 1(5), 219-244. Retrieved May 8, 2005 from http://www.ITandSociety.org
  9. Jackson, L.A., Ervin, K.S., Gardner, P.D., & Schmitt, N. (2001). Gender and the Internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles, 44, 363-380.
  10. Katz, J.E., & Rice, R.E. (2002). Social consequences of Internet use: Access, involvement, and interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  11. Kraut, R., Scherlis, W., Mukopadhyay, T., Manning, J., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The HomeNet field trial of residential Internet services. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 39, 55-65.
  12. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological wellbeing? American Psychologist, 53, 1017-1031.
  13. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49-74.
  14. Nie, N.J., & Erbring, L. (2000). Internet and society: A preliminary report. Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
  15. Pew Internet and American Life Project (2000a). Tracking online life: How women use the Internet to cultivate relationships with family and friends. Retrieved May 8, 2005, from http://www.pewinternet.org
  16. Pew Internet and American Life Project (2000b). African Americans and the Internet. Retrieved May 8, 2005, from http://www.pewinternet.org
  17. Pew Internet and American Life Project (2002). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between Internet savvy students and their schools. Retrieved May 8, 2005, from
  18. Rocheleau, B. (1995). Computer use by school-age children: Trends, patterns and predictors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1, 1-17.
  19. Shields, M.K., & Behrman, R.E. (2000). Children and computer technology: Analysis and recommendations. The Future of Children, 10(2), 4-30. Retrieved May 8, 2005, from http://www.futureofchildren.org
  20. Turow, J., & Nir, L. (2000). The Internet and the family 2000: The view from parents the view from kids. Philadelphia, PA: Annenberg Public Policy Center.
  21. UCLA Internet Project. (2000). Surveying the digital future: Year 1. UCLA Center for Communication Policy, University of California, Los Angeles. Retrieved May 8, 2005, from
  22. UCLA Internet Project. (2001). Surveying the digital future: Year 2. UCLA Center for Communication Policy, University of California, Los Angeles. Retrieved May 8, 2005, from
  23. UCLA Internet Project. (2003). Surveying the digital future, Year 3. UCLA Center for Communication Policy, University of California, Los Angeles. Retrieved May 8, 2005, from
  24. U.S. Department of Commerce. 2000. Falling through the Net: Toward digital inclusion. National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce Digital Divide Web site. Retrieved May 8, 2005, from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/dn/index.html Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  25. Woodward, E.H. IV, & Gridina, N. (2000). Media in the home in 2000: The fifth annual survey of parents and children. Philadelphia: Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania. Yelland, N., & Lloyd, M. (2001). Virutal kids of the 21st century: Understanding children in schools today. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, (pp. 175-192). Jackson, von Eye, Biocca, Barbatsis, Zhao, and Fitzgerald

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections