You are here:

Teach Mathematics with technology: put into practice a theoretical framework
PROCEEDINGS

, Minho University, Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Portugal ; , Minho University, Portugal

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in New Orleans, Louisiana, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-02-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

This paper is a report on the findings of a study conducted to examine the results of implementing an educational technology course focused on interactive whiteboard classroom applications according to TPACK Mathematics. It was examined the change in teachers’ attitudes toward using technology and perceived ability to integrate interactive whiteboards in Mathematics class, 9 months after and 3 years later. It is exposed the theoretical TPACK about integration of educational technology in the teaching/learning process, reflecting on the need for teachers to have continuous professional development. It was observed a positive evolution about their use of ICT in classroom context and their level of competence in ICT use, reporting that this kind of training is usefulness in their teaching practice and can contribute to improve student learning by their professional development.

Citation

Sampaio, P. & Coutinho, C. (2013). Teach Mathematics with technology: put into practice a theoretical framework. In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2013--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4852-4857). New Orleans, Louisiana, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 25, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. AMTE (2009). Mathematics TPACK (Technological Pedagogical
  2. Cox, S. (2008). A conceptual analysis of technological pedagogical content knowledge. (Phd tesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT).
  3. Culp, K., Honey, M., & Mandinach, E. (2003). A retrospective on twenty years of education technology policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. Available http://www.nationaledtechplan.org/participate/20years.pdf (02/12/2011).
  4. Ferdig, R. (2006). Assessing technologies for teaching and learning: understanding the importance of technological pedagogical content knowledge. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 749 – 760.
  5. Grandgenett, N., Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2011, February 13). Mathematics learning activity types. Available College of William and Mary, School of Education, Learning Activity Types Wiki: http://activitytypes.wmwikis.net/file/view/MathLearningATs-Feb2011.pdf Guskey, T. (2002). Professional Development and Teacher Change. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 8 (3/4), 381-391
  6. Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2006). Planned improvisations: Technology-supported learning activity design in social studies. Paper presented at National Educational Computing Conference 2006, San Diego, CA. Available http://center.uoregon.edu/ISTE/NECC2006/program/search_results_details.php?sessionid=13514149 (19/11/2008).
  7. Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2007). Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Curriculum-based Technology Integration Reframed. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Available(cid:1) http://tpck.org/tpck/index.php?title=Reference_Library (30/12/2011).
  8. Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Learning Activity Types: Curriculum-based Technology Integration Reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416.
  9. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design Educational Technology? The development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
  10. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P., Love, N., & Stiles, K. (1998). Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  11. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: a sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  12. Miller, D., Glover, D., & Averis, D. (2005). Developing Pedagogic Skills for the Use of the Interactive Whiteboard in Mathematics. British Educational Research Association. Available http://bit.ly/iwbpedagogy05bera (10/10/2012).
  13. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017– 1054.
  14. Niess, M. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509 – 523.
  15. Niess, M. (2006). Guest Editorial: Preparing teachers to teach mathematics with technology. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(2). Available http://www.citejournal.org/vol6/iss2/mathematics/article1.cfm (06/05/2011).
  16. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5 ª ediç ã o). New York: Free Press.
  17. Sampaio, P., & Coutinho, C. (2011). Forma ç ã o contí nua de professores: integra ç ã o das TIC. Revista FAED – Revista da Faculdade de Educa ç ã o, 9(15), 139-151.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Interactive Whiteboards Research and the Mathematics Classroom: A LearnTechLib Review

    Gregory Chamblee, Georgia Southern University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2016 (Mar 21, 2016) pp. 2484–2489

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.