You are here:

Using Live Dual Modeling to Help Preservice Teachers Develop TPACK
PROCEEDINGS

, , Syracuse University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Austin, Texas, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-92-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

Preservice teachers’ lacking teaching experience presents challenges to them when they use technology to solve instructional problems in authentic settings. Modeling is a viable way to compensate preservice teachers’ lack of teaching experience and help them learn how to teach with technology. In this study, to help preservice teachers develop knowledge about teaching with technology, we designed and implemented a live dual modeling strategy which involves both live behavior modeling and cognitive modeling. We investigated what preservice teachers learned from the live dual modeling in a technology integration course and what the problems were when the live dual modeling strategy was used. The preliminary findings showed that preservice teachers demonstrated the initial ability to transfer what they learned in the modeling to real-world classroom teaching. We also discussed the problems found when live dual modeling was used in the course.

Citation

Lu, L. & Lei, J. (2012). Using Live Dual Modeling to Help Preservice Teachers Develop TPACK. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of SITE 2012--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4729-4737). Austin, Texas, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 21, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Allinder, R.M. (2001). Effects of modeling on attitudes and perceptions of preservice special education teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24(4), 362-372.
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  3. Bandura, A., & Walters, R.H. (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
  4. Bolton, C. (1997). Developing teachers: A novice-expert study of initial teacher preparation. Paper presented at the annual conference of American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Phoenix, Arizona.
  5. Doering, A., Hughes, J., & Huffman, D. (2003). Preservice teachers: Are we thinking with technology? Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 35(3), 342–361.
  6. Faison, C.L. (1996). Modeling instructional technology use in teacher preparation: Why we can’t wait. Educational Technology, 36, 57-59.
  7. Fleming, L., Motamedi, V., & May, L. (2007). Predicting preservice teacher competence in computer technology: Modeling and application in training environments. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(2), 207-231.
  8. Graham, C.R., Tripp, T., & Wentworth, N. (2007). Using preservice teacher work samples as a means for assessing and improving technology integration in field experiences. Paper presented at the 18th annual conference of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education, San Antonio, TX.
  9. Greenhow, C., Dexter, S., & Hughes, J.E. (2008). Teacher knowledge about technology integration: An examination of inservice and preservice teachers’ instructional decision-making. Science Education International, 19(1), 9-25.
  10. Harmon, P., & Evans, K. (1984). When to use cognitive modeling. Training and Development Journal, 38(3), 67-68.
  11. Hughes, J. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences informing technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 277-302.
  12. Jaipal, K., & Figg, C. (2010). Unpacking the "Total PACKage": Emergent TPACK characteristics from a study of preservice teachers teaching with technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(3), 415441.
  13. Jang, S., & Chen, K.(2010). From PCK to TPACK: Developing a transformative model for pre-service science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19 (6), 553-564.
  14. Jonassen, D.H. (1995). Supporting communities of learners with technology: A vision for integrating technology with learning in schools. Educational technology, 35(4), 60-63.
  15. Kay, R. (2006). Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into preservice education: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,38(4), 383-408.
  16. Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
  17. Koh, J.H.L., & Divaharan, S. (2011). Developing pre-service teachers’ technology integration expertise through the TPACK-developing instructional model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44 (1), 35-58.
  18. Kolodner, J.L., Camp, P.J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting Learning by DesignTM into practice, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495-547.
  19. Kolodner, J.L., Gray, J., & Fasse, B.B. (2003). Promoting transfer through case-based reasoning: Rituals and practices in learning by design classrooms. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 119-170.
  20. Lederman, N.G. (1999). Teachers' understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 916-929.
  21. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J.(2006).Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-54.
  22. Niess, M.L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509-523.
  23. Pope, M., Hare, D. & Howard, E. (2005). Enhancing Technology Use in Student Teaching: A Case Study. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. 13 (4), pp. 573-618.
  24. Sarason, I.G. (1973). Test anxiety and cognitive modeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 58-61.
  25. Smith, S.B. (2001). Teacher education: Technology 101: Integration beyond a technology foundations course. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(1), 43-45.
  26. Virta, A. (2002). Becoming a history teacher: Observations on the beliefs and growth of student teachers. Teaching& Teacher Education, 18, 687-698.
  27. West, R.E., & Graham, C.R. (2007). Benefits and challenges of using live modeling to help preservice teachers transfer technology integration principles. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(4), 131-141.
  28. Westerman, D.A. (1991). Expert and novice teacher decision making. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 292305.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.