You are here:

A Case Study of Evaluating Integration of Web 2.0 Technology with English Curriculum in Higher Education

, Department of Foreign Language of Military Academy, Taiwan ; , West Liberty University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Austin, Texas, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-92-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


The study aimed to investigate how pre-service and in-service English teachers understand their experiences of integrating the emerging technology, YouTube, with English curriculum in the higher education. This research further explored participants’ perceptions of adapting Quality Matters to evaluate videos’ contents on YouTube for English teaching. 17 pre-service and in-service English teachers were involved in the study. A case study including a semi-structured interview and Quality Matters evaluation was employed for data collection. The findings provided recommendations for pre-service and in-service English teachers in teacher preparation and professional development programs to integrate YouTube with English curriculum in the higher education in the future.


Lee, C.Y. & Peng, L.W. (2012). A Case Study of Evaluating Integration of Web 2.0 Technology with English Curriculum in Higher Education. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of SITE 2012--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4104-4109). Austin, Texas, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 22, 2019 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Associated Press. (2010). Districts change policies, embrace Twitter, YouTube for educational purposes. Educational Week, 29(25), 10.
  2. Benevenuto, F., Duarte, F., Rodrigues, T., Almeida, V., Almeida, J., & Ross, K. (2008). Understanding video interactions in YouTube. In Proceeding of ACM Multimedia (MM).
  3. Cheng, X., Dale, C., & Liu, J. (2007). Understanding the characteristics of Internet short video sharing: YouTube as a case study. Proceeding of 7th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement.
  4. Clark, H., & Barber, B. (2003). Matching content, pedagogy, and technologies in distance education. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2003 (pp. 2346-2349). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  5. Duffy, P. (2007). Engaging the YouTube Google-eyed generation: Strategies for using Web 2.0 in teaching and learning. Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on e-Learning, 173.
  6. Keengwe, J., Whittaker, S., Anyanwu, L., Arome, G., & Tate-Blake, C. (2004). Distance education: Design considerations for effective and successful distance learning. Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning inCorporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2004, 1290-1296.
  7. Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1). 60-70.
  8. Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3-29). Mahwah, NJ:
  9. Mullen, R., & Wedwick, L. (2008). Avoiding the digital abyss: Getting started in the classroom with YouTube, digital stories, and Blogs. ClearingHouse: Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues, and Ideas, 82(2), 66-69.
  10. Niess, M.L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509-523.
  11. Schmidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A., Mishra, P., Koehler, M., & Shin, T. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for pre-service teachers. JRTE, 42(2), 123-149.
  12. Tremblay, R. (2006). Best practices and collaborative software in online teaching. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(1), 1-5.
  13. Trier, J. (2007). “Cool” engagements with YouTube: Part 1. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 50, 408-412.
  14. Weimann, G. (2010). Terror on Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 16(2), 45-54.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact