You are here:

If Not Now! When? A Mobile Badge Reward System for K-12 Teachers

, Higher Colleges of Technology HCT, Business/IT Dep.,SWC,UAE, United Arab Emirates ; , Santa Cruz County Office of Education, United States ; , University of North Texas, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Austin, Texas, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-92-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


Badges can be an effective method to publically recognize and reward individual achievement in certain areas of expertise. Badge recognition systems are on the rise in business, social networking environments, and most recently, in education. The MacArthur Foundation’s Badges for Lifelong Learning competition, launched in collaboration with the Mozilla Foundation, focuses on badges as a means of inspiring teaching and learning in the digital age, confirming accomplishments and validating skills. The authors contend a mobile badge system that gives teachers recognition in the area of mobile technologies and applications integration is needed to encourage professional development for K-12 teachers. In this paper the authors review the current situation of K-12 teachers, describe badge reward systems and how they work, propose a novel mobile badge reward system for K-12 Teachers, and describe the possible benefits that can be gained from implementing such a system.


Khaddage, F., Baker, R. & Knezek, G. (2012). If Not Now! When? A Mobile Badge Reward System for K-12 Teachers. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of SITE 2012--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2900-2905). Austin, Texas, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 24, 2019 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Heneman, H. And Milanowski, A. (1999). “Teachers Attitudes about Teacher Bonuses Under School-Based-2904-Kelley, C.,Heneman, H. And Milanowski, A. (2002). ‘Teacher Motivation and School-Based Performance Awards’, Education Administration Quarterly, 38 (3), pp 372-401
  2. Khaddage, F. & Knezek, G. (2011). “Opportunities for Mobile Application to Empower Informal Learning in University Environments”.Proceedings of World Conference on E-learning inCorporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2011 (pp. 236-243). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  3. Khaddage, F., Lattemann, C., & Bray, E. (2011). “Mobile Apps Integration for Teaching and Learning,(Are Teachers Ready to Re-blend?)”,Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (pp. 25452552),
  4. Odden, A. (2000).“New and better forms of teacher compensation are possible”, Phi Delta Kappan, 81 (5).
  5. Odden, A. (2001).‘Defining Merit’, Education Matters, 1 (1), pp 16-24.
  6. Odden, A. And Kelley, C. (2002). “Paying Teachers for What They Know And Do”: New And SmarterCompensation Strategies to Improve Schools, 2nd Edition, Corwin Press, California.
  7. Richardson, R. (1999).Performance Related Pay in Schools: “An Assessment of the Green Papers, A report prepared for the National Union of Teachers”, The London School of Economics and PoliticalScience.
  8. [Last Accessed November 2011]Solomon, L and Podgursky, M. (2001). “The Pros and Cons of Performance-Based Compensation”, Milken Family Foundation, Pascadena.
  9. Tomlinson, H. (2000). ‘Proposals for Performance Related Pay in English Schools’, School Leadership and Management, 20(3), pp 281-298.
  10. Waterreus, J. (2001).Incentives in Secondary Education, Max Goote, Amsterdam.-2905 DASHDASH

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact