You are here:

Promoting Faculty Competence in Teaching with Technology in Medical and Health Science Education

, , University of North Texas Health Science Center, United States ; , University of Arizona College of Medicine, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Austin, Texas, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-92-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


Health sciences faculty are facing a multitude of challenges as the society demands more healthcare professionals who are competent in providing professional, evidence-based care to a population with increasing diversity. Among the challenges, relevant to this study is the health sciences faculty’s use of technology in teaching to facilitate students’ achievement of desired competencies. While faculty development plays a critical role in addressing such challenge, it is still at the beginning stage to systematically implement and investigate programs aiming at promoting faculty’s knowledge and skills in teaching with technology. The Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) theory provides a sound theoretical framework for health sciences faculty development. This paper describes the implementation of TPACK in a health science center and reports preliminary findings.


Huang, K., Collins, V. & Savi, C. (2012). Promoting Faculty Competence in Teaching with Technology in Medical and Health Science Education. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of SITE 2012--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2326-2331). Austin, Texas, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 21, 2019 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Barab, S.A., & Duffy, T.M. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen& S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundation of learning environments (P. 25–56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  2. Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
  3. Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
  4. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
  5. Irby, D., & Wilkerson, L. (2003). Educational innovations in academic medicine and environmental trends. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18, 370-376.
  6. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning. Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
  7. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  8. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
  9. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
  10. Skeff, K., Stratos, G., & Mount, J. (2007). Faculty development in medicine: A field in evolution. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 280-285.
  11. Steinert, Y., Macdonald, M., Boillat, M., Elizov, M., Meterissian, S., Razack, S., Ouellet, M., & McLeod, P. (2010). Faculty development: If you build it, they will come. Medical Education, 44, 900-907.
  12. Steinert, Y., Mann, K., Centeno, A., Dolmans, D., Spencer, J., Gelula, M., & Prideaux, D. (2006). A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Medical Teacher, 28(6), 497-526.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact