You are here:

Learning Literacy and Content Through Video Activities in Primary Education
PROCEEDINGS

, , , University of Twente, Netherlands

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Austin, Texas, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-92-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

This case study research explored to what extent and in which ways teachers used Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) and related competencies to implement video activities in primary education. Three Dutch teachers implemented video activities to improve students’ content knowledge and literacy- and communication skills simultaneously. Lesson materials were provided but teachers chose the theme or subject (content) linked to the video activities themselves. Results show that applying TPCK in practice is not obvious for all teachers. Differences between teachers are mainly found in applying Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPK). Two teachers used the lesson materials as a guideline while the third teacher used it more prescriptive in teaching the lessons. Teachers were excited about students’ performance and enthusiasm. All teachers thought the video activities fit their usual program and none of them experienced the lessons as additional or too much effort.

Citation

Heitink, M., Fisser, P. & McKenney, S. (2012). Learning Literacy and Content Through Video Activities in Primary Education. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of SITE 2012--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1363-1369). Austin, Texas, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 22, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Birmingham, P., Davies, C. (2001) Storyboarding Shakespeare: learners’ interaction with storyboard software in the process of understanding difficult literacy texts. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10 (3), 241-253.
  2. Christensen, R. & Knezek, G. (2001). Instruments for assessing the impact of technology in education. Computers in the Schools, 18 (2), 5-25.
  3. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
  4. Fleiss, J.L. (1971) "Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters." Psychological Bulletin 76 (5), 378–382
  5. Fleming, M., & Levie, W. (1993). Instructional message design: Principles from the behavioral and cognitive sciences. New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
  6. Grossman, P. & Thompson, C. (2008). Learning from curriculum materials: Scaffolds for new teachers? Teaching and Teacher Education 24, 2014-2026.
  7. Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers& Education, 51(4), 1499–1509.
  8. Hofer, M. & Swan, K.O. (2008). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in action: A case study of a middle school digital documentary Project. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(2), 179-200.
  9. Kennnisnet. (2005). Wat weten we over…taal en ict. Zoetermeer: Stichting Kennisnet Ict op School.
  10. Knezek, G.A., Christensen, R.W., Miyashita, K.T., & Ropp, M.M. (2000). Instruments for assessing educator progress in technology integration. Denton: University of North Texas. Retrieved 26 April 2009 from http://www.iittl.unt.edu/pt3II/book1.htm
  11. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054.
  12. Peterson, S. (2003). Peer response and students’ revisions of their narrative writing. Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 3, 239-272.
  13. Ponder, G. & Doyle, W. (1976). Schooling as symbol: The ideal of equality. Educational Forum 4, 403-415.
  14. Schmidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A., Koehler, M.J., Shin, T., & Mishra, P. (2009, April). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Paper presented at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, California.
  15. Smits, M. (2009). Schrijven en leren op de Pabo. Warnsveld: EduCompagnon.
  16. So, H.J. & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning: Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 101-116.
  17. Tannenbaum, R.S. (1998). Communication theory and developments underlying the use of multimedia. Theoretical Foundations of Multimedia. New York: computer Science Press.-1368 DASHDASH
  18. Ten Brummelhuis, A.C.A. & Drent, M. (2000). ICT monitor 1998 – 1999. Basisonderwijs. Enschede: Universiteit Twente.
  19. Voogt, J., McKenney, S., Smits, M. & Bustraan, W. (2009). Teacher’s use of educative curriculum materials in an integrated writing and science curriculum. Paper gepresenteerd op Onderwijs Research Dagen; Leuven.
  20. Zhao, Y. (2003). What should teachers know about technology? Perspectives and practices. Greenwich, CO: Information Age Publishing.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.