You are here:

Learning to Teach Geometry with Technology: A Case Study of One In-Service Teacher’s Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge
PROCEEDINGS

, Texas State University, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Honolulu, Hawaii, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-90-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Abstract

In today’s information-age world, teachers are strongly encouraged to use technology in classroom instruction. By using a technological pedagogical content knowledge framework, this case study examined how one teacher developed knowledge for teaching geometry with technology and how she used that knowledge in her classroom instruction. Multiple sources of data were collected to aid in identifying the levels of knowledge that the teacher exhibited during her first year of using dynamic geometry software in teaching. Results suggest that much time is needed in order to teach effectively with technology and professional development is crucial.

Citation

McBroom, E. (2011). Learning to Teach Geometry with Technology: A Case Study of One In-Service Teacher’s Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. In C. Ho & M. Lin (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2011--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2427-2432). Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 23, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Hannafin, R.D., Burruss, J.D., & Little, C. (2001). Learning with dynamic geometry programs: Perspectives of teachers and learners. Journal of Educational Research, 94(3), 132 – 144.
  2. International Society for Technology in Education (2008). National Educationsl Technology Standards for Teachers (2nd ed.).
  3. Knapp, A.K., Barret, J.E., & Kaufmann, M.L. (2007). Prompting teacher knowledge development using dynamic geometry software. In T. Lamberg & L. Wiest (Eds.) Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting of of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 1098-1105. Stateline, NV: University of Nevada (Reno).
  4. Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  5. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principle and standards for school mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/standards/content.aspx?id=26809
  6. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  7. Texas Education Agency (2005). Professional development and appraisal system: Teacher manual. Austin, TX: Author. Http://www5.esc13.net/pdas/docs/PDASTeacherManual.pdf
  8. Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research: Design and method (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Acknowledgements

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.