You are here:

Shared Assessment: a Strategy for Managing Multidisciplinary Projects

, ECU, Australia ; , , Edith Cowan University, Australia

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Lisbon, Portugal ISBN 978-1-880094-89-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC


Assessment-centered is the new black, apparently, if you believe recent research literature (eg. Boud & Associates, 2010) – but multi-disciplinary student assessments in multimedia are already challenging to assess. Naturally the more complex the project the more challenging it is for those administering the assessments, and in multi-unit settings (rather than end-of-course ‘capstone’ units) the complexity can be extreme. The consequential staff overload is insufficiently addressed even if the results are worth it. Shared assessments start with one large situated project and ask multiple staff running multiple units to collaborate whilst designing their assessments, all based around student teams ‘solving’ that project. This on-going research has developed criteria for better supporting staff in complex multidisciplinary projects in multimedia. After two years of iterations we thought to share the draft criteria, the positive results and the challenges through this paper and use feedback to better prepare for future iterations.


Clarkson, B., Jung, J.H.(. & Masek, M. (2011). Shared Assessment: a Strategy for Managing Multidisciplinary Projects. In T. Bastiaens & M. Ebner (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2011--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 2925-2930). Lisbon, Portugal: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 19, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Adamczyk, P., & Twidale, M. (2007). Supporting multidisciplinary collaboration: requirements from novel HCI education Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 1073-6). San Jose, California, USA: ACM.
  2. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice: OpenUniv Pr.
  3. Bloxham, S., & Boyd, P. (2007). Developing Effective Assessment in Higher Education: A Practical Guide (Vol. 44). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
  4. Boud, D., & Associates. (2010). Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
  5. Burnell, L., Priest, J., & Durrett, J. (2002). Teaching distributed multidisciplinary software development. Software, IEEE, 19(5), 86-93.
  6. Clarkson, B., & Brook, C. (2007). Achieving synergies through generic skills: A strength of online communities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(2), 248-268. Http://
  7. Elwood, J., & Klenowski, V. (2002). Creating Communities of Shared Practice: The challenges of assessment use in learning and teaching. Assessment& Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(3), 243-256.
  8. Gardner, H. (1984). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. London: Heineman.
  9. Harris, L.R., & Brown, G.T.L. (2009). The complexity of teachers' conceptions of assessment: tensions between the needs of schools and students. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy& Practice, 16(3), 365-381.
  10. Jonassen, D.H. (1994). Thinking technology: Towards a constructivist design model. Educational technology, April 1994, 34-37.
  11. Reeves, T., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2002). Authentic activities and online learning. Quality conversations: Research and development in higher education, 25, 562-567.
  12. Reeves, T.C., McKenney, S., & Herrington, J. (2011). Publishing and perishing: The critical importance of educational design research. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 55-65.
  13. Shepard, L. (2000). The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14. Doi: citeulike-articleid:4096634
  14. Unwin, C., & Caraher, J. (2000). The heart of authenticity: shared assessment in the teacher education classroom. Teacher Education Quarterly, 27(3), 71-87.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact