You are here:

Addressing e-Assessment practices in e-Learning Activities: A Review PROCEEDINGS

, Graz University of Technology, Austria ; , Graz University of Technology AND Curtin University of Technology, Austria ; , Curtin University of Technology, Australia

Global Learn, in Melbourne, Australia ISBN 978-1-880094-85-3 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Abstract

In today’s “information age”, learners grow up with technology dominating most of their life activities. Given the dominance of technology, it is no surprise that learning and educational strategies have been influenced by emerging use of technology. As a result of this, learning and educational systems have become more modern and global. Assessment as a main part of any learning systems has evolved over the last fifty years and educators have to cope with the changes in the educational systems. This paper discusses the need for enhanced assessment activities that should be flexibly integrated into the learning process. Moreover, it explores the historical overview of e-assessment and its evolution as emerging forms of assessment and their practices in the new culture of e-learning and e-assessment. To this end, learning activities have to be linked with assessment to make the learning more exciting and in turn, this would attract learners and engage them in the learning process.

Citation

AL-Smadi, M., Gütl, C. & Chang, V. (2011). Addressing e-Assessment practices in e-Learning Activities: A Review. In S. Barton, J. Hedberg & K. Suzuki (Eds.), Proceedings of Global Learn Asia Pacific 2011--Global Conference on Learning and Technology (pp. 448-459). Melbourne, Australia: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 19, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Almond, R., Steinberg, L. & Mislevy, R. (2002). Enhancing the design and delivery of assessment systems: A four process architecture. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 1, 5.
  2. Baron, J. And Keller M. (2003). Use of rubrics in online assessment in the Evaluations and Assessment
  3. Conference. (2003) Adelaide, South Australia: University of South Australia.-455-Brinke, D. Bruggen, J. Hermans, H. Burgers, J. Giesbers B., & Koper,R. (2007). Modeling assessment for reuse of traditional and new types of assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 2721-2741.
  4. Bull, S., Brna, P., Critchley, S., Davie, K. And Holzherr, C. (1999). The Missing Peer, Artificial Peers and the Enhancement of Human-Human Collaborative Student Modelling. In Proceedings of AIED 99, 1999, 269-276.
  5. Carlson, P., & Frederick Berry, F. (2007). A Web-Based Tool for Implementing Peer-Review. In Proceeding of ASEE.
  6. Cole, M. (2009). Using wiki technology to support student engagement: Lessons from the trenches. Computers& Education, 52(1), 141-146.
  7. Cubric, M. (2007) Wiki-based Process Framework for Blended Learning. In WikiSym’ 07, Montréal, Québec,
  8. Crisp, G. (2007). The e-Assessment Handbook. Continuum International Publishing Group, New York. Dagger D., O ’ Connor A., Lawless S., Walsh E., and Wade V.P. (2007). Service-Oriented E-Learning Platforms from Monolithic Systems to Flexible Services, Published by the IEEE Computer Society 2007.
  9. Daradoumis, A., Martínez Monés, A., and Xhafa, F. (2006). A layered framework for evaluating on-line collaborative learning interactions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 64(7), 622-635.
  10. Davies, P (2003). Peer-Assessment: No marks required just feedback? – Evaluating the Quality of Computerized Peer-Feedback compared with Computerized Peer-Marking. In Cook, J and McConnell, D (Eds), Communities of Practice, Research Proceedings of the 10th Association for Learning Technology Conference (ALT-C 2003), 8-10 Sept 2003, Sheffield, UK.
  11. Dochy, F.J. And McDowell, L. (1997) Introduction: Assessment as a tool for learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23 (4), 279-298.
  12. Downing, T. And Brown, I. (1997). Learning by cooperative publishing on the World-Wide Web. Active Learning 7, 1997, 14-16.
  13. Ebner, M., Kickmeier-Rust, M. And Holzinger, A. (2008). Utilizing wiki-systems in higher education classes: A chance for universal access? Universal Access in the Information Society, 7, 199-207.
  14. Elliott B. (2008). Online Collaborative Assessment, Scottish Qualifications Authority.
  15. Eschenbach, E.A. And Mesmer, M.A. (1998). Web-based forms for design team peer evaluations. American Society for Engineering Education 1998, Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 2630.
  16. Forsythe G.E. And Wirth N. (1965). Automatic grading programs, Communications of the ACM, 8(5):275-278.
  17. Freeman M. & McKenzie J. (2002), SPARK, A Confidential Web-Based Template for Self and Peer Assessment of Student Teamwork: Benefits of Evaluating across Different Subjects, British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 551-69.
  18. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., and Archer, W. (2001). Critical Thinking, Cognitive Presence, and Computer Conferencing in Distance Education. The American Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp 7-23.
  19. Gehringer, E.F. (2000). Strategies and mechanisms for electronic peer review. In Proceedings, Frontiers in Education Conference, Vol 1. F1B/2-F1B/7.
  20. Glaser, B. (2005). The Grounded Theory Perspective III: Theoretical Coding, Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA. Gütl, C. (2010, to appear). The Support of Virtual 3D Worlds for enhancing Collaboration in Learning Settings. Canada, 21-23 October 2007. Pp. 11-22.
  21. Hara, N., Bonk, C.J., and Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28, 115 – 152.
  22. Hayes, B.G. (1999). Where's the data? Is multimedia instruction effective in training counselors? Journal of Technology in Counseling 1.1 [On-line]. Retrieved on 7 July 2008 from: http://jtc.colstate.edu/vol1_1/multimedia.htm.
  23. Hollingsworth, J. (1960). Automatic graders for programming classes. Communication of the ACM, 3(10):528 – 529.
  24. Huang, H. (2002). Toward constructivism for adult learners in online learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), 27-37.
  25. Issroff, K., and del Soldato, T. (1996). Incorporating motivation into computer-supported collaborative learning. In Proceedings of European conference on artificial intelligence in education. Ficha Tecnica, Lisbon. Johnson, D.W. And R. Johnson. (1989). Computer-assisted cooperative learning. Educational Technology 26(1): 12 – 18.
  26. Jonassen, D.H. (1994) Thinking technology: Toward a Constructivist design model. Educational Technology, 34-37.
  27. Jones, A., and Issroff, K. (2005). Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers& Education 44, 395-408.
  28. Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  29. Kickmeier-Rust, M.D., Steiner, C.M., and Albert, D. (2009). Non-invasive Assessment and Adaptive Interventions in Learning Games, International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems INCOS 09, pp. 301 –
  30. 305.Knight, P. (1995). Assessment for learning in Higher Education. London: Kogan Page.
  31. Kriz, W.C. (2003). Creating Effective Learning Environments and Learning Organizations through Gaming and Simulation Design, Simulation and Gaming, Vol. 34, Iss. 4, pp 495-511.
  32. Leuf, B. And Cunningham, W. (2001) The Wiki Way Quick Collaboration on the Web. Addison Wesley.
  33. Macdonald, J. (2003). Assessing Online Collaborative Learning: Process and Product. Computers& Education, 40 (4), pp. 377-391.
  34. Millard, D., Howard, Y., Bailey, C., Davis, H., Gilbert, L., Jeyes, S., Price, J., Sclater, N., Sherratt, R., Tulloch, I., Wills, G. & Young, R. (2005). Mapping the e-Learning Assessment Domain: Concept Maps for Orientation and Navigation. In Proceedings of e-Learn 2005, Vancouver, Canada.
  35. Mislevy, R.J., Almond, R.G., & Lukas, J.F. (2004). A brief introduction to evidence-centered design (CSE Technical Report 632). Last retrieved 20th October 2010 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED483399.pdf.
  36. Murphy, S. (1994). Portfolios and curriculum reform: Patterns in practice. Assessing Writing, 1, 175-206.
  37. Myers R. (1986). Computerized Grading of Freshman Chemistry Laboratory Experiments, Journal of Chemical Education, Volume 63, Pages 507-509.
  38. Orsmond, P. (2004): Self-and peer-assessment: guidance on practice in the biosciences. In Teaching Bioscience Enhancing Learning Series, S. Maw, J. Wilson, and H. Sears (Eds), pp. 1-47, Leeds, UK: The Higher Education
  39. Pelz, W. (2004) Three principles of effective online pedagogy. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 8(3): 33 – 46, 2004.
  40. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. In On the Horizon, October 2001, 9(5), NCB University Press.
  41. Rada, R., Acquah, S., Baker, B., and Ramsey, P. (1993). Collaborative Learning and the MUCH System. Computers and Education, 20(3), 225-233.
  42. Reiser, R.A. (2001). A History of Instructional Design and Technology: Part I: A History of Instructional Design. ETR & D, 2001, Vol. 49, No. 1, 53 – 64.
  43. Rottmann R.M. And Hudson H.T. (1983). Computer Grading As an Instructional Tool, Journal of College Science Teaching, Volume 12, Pages 152-156.
  44. Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online. London: Kogan-Page.
  45. Screen Digest. (2009). There ’ s life beyond World of Warcraft. Subscription MMOGs: Life beyond World of Warcraft, Retrieved on 8 December, 2009 from http://www.screendigest.com/press/releases/pdf/PRLifeBeyondWorldOfWarcraft-240309.pdf
  46. Shepard, L. (2000). The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture. Educational Researcher, 29 (7), 4-14.
  47. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., and Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R.K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 409 – 426).
  48. Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 7(17).
  49. Sung, Y., Chang, K., Chiou, S., and Hou, H. (2005). The design and application of a web-based self-and peerassessment system. Computers& Education, 45(2), 187 – 202.
  50. Swan, K., Shen, J. And Hiltz, R. (2006). Assessment and collaboration in online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10 (1), 45-62.
  51. Trahasch, S. (2004). Towards a flexible peer assessment system. In Proceeding, Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET 2004), 2004, 516-520.
  52. Tsai, C.-C., Lin, S.S., and Yuan, S.-M. (2002). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers& Education, 38 (1-3), 241-252.
  53. Trentin, G. (2009). Using a wiki to evaluate individual contribution to a collaborative learning project. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 43-55.
  54. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. WebPA, http://webpaproject.lboro.ac.uk.Retrieved5th.Februa Ry. (2009).
  55. Woolley, D.R. (1994). PLATO: The emergence of on-line community. Computer-Mediated Communication Magazine, 1(3), 5.
  56. Zumbach, J., Hillers, A. And Reimann, P. (2003) 'Supporting distributed problem-based learning: the use of feedback in online learning', in Roberts, T. (Ed.): Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice, Idea Group, Hershey, PA, pp.86-103.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.