You are here:

Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in the Elementary Classroom: A Case Study of One Teacher’s Decision Making Process
PROCEEDINGS

, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Nashville, Tennessee, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-84-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

With more digital technologies entering classrooms every year, there is a need to observe how teachers plan for thoughtful integration. The purpose of this study is to understand the thought processes and decisions a fifth grade teacher makes to integrate technology into her lessons using the TPCK framework (Mishra & Koehler 2006) and how her pedagogical beliefs affect those processes. Based on qualitative data analysis, this paper shares a fifth grade teacher’s experience planning for the integration of technology in a technology-rich, low SES, Title I classroom.

Citation

Beeson, M. (2011). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in the Elementary Classroom: A Case Study of One Teacher’s Decision Making Process. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2011--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4273-4280). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 24, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Angers, J., & Machtmes, K. (2005). An ethnographic –case study of beliefs, context factors, and practices of teachers integrating technology. The Qualitative Report, 10(4), 771-794.
  2. Ching, C., Wang, X., Shih, M., & Kedem, Y. (2006). Digital photography and journals in a kindergarten-first-grade classroom: Toward meaningful technology integration in early childhood education. Early Education and Development, 17(3), 347-371.
  3. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. Ertmer, P.A., (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research& Development, 53(4), 25-39.
  4. Ertmer, P., Addison, P., Lane, M., Ross, E., & Woods, D. (1999). Examining teachers' beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 54.
  5. Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2009). Teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416.
  6. Hess, F., & Leal, D. (1999). Computer-assisted learning in urban classrooms: The impact of politics, race, and class. Urban Education, 34(3), 370-88.
  7. Jonassen, D., Howland, J., Marra, R.M., & Crismond, D. (2008). Meaningful learning with technology. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
  8. Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (2004). Enhancing practicing primary school teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in teaching. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 121-140.
  9. Kemker, K., Barron, A., & Harmes, J. (2007). Laptop computers in the elementary classroom: Authentic instruction with at-risk students. Educational Media International, 44(4), 305-321.
  10. Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2006). Teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology-based classrooms: A developmental view. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(2), 157-181.
  11. Lim, C., & Chai, C. (2008). Teachers' pedagogical beliefs and their planning and conduct of computer-mediated classroom lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 807-828.
  12. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  13. Mouza, C. (2008). Learning with laptops: Implementation and outcomes in an urban, under-privileged school. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(4), 447-472.
  14. Palak, D., & Walls, R.T. (2009). Teachers’ beliefs and technology practices: A mixed-methods approach. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 417-441.
  15. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5).
  16. Schrum, L., & Levin, B.B. (2009). Leading 21st century schools: Harnessing technology for engagement and achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
  17. Shank, G.D. (2006). Qualitative research: A personal skills approach. 2nd Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  18. Staples, A., Pugach, M., & Himes, D. (2005). Rethinking the technology integration challenge: Cases from three urban elementary schools. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(3), 285-311.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.