Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Nashville, Tennessee, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-84-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA
This case study, interpretive research exposed the effects of learning about mathematical functions through explorations with Global Position Systems (GPS), motion detectors, spreadsheets and descriptions in a documentary website have on enhancing the K-8 teachers’ four strands of mathematics proficiency. Fourteen teachers in a two-week, half day summer institute were engaged in a graduate course that utilized these technologies, website creation, and digital cameras to develop conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, strategic competence adaptive reasoning, and productive dispositions, preparing them to become more fluent in mathematics and in teaching mathematics. Analysis of multiple data sources indicated that not only did the teachers develop their understanding of the mathematical functions in question, but they also increased their ability and understanding of the meaningful integration of learning technologies into their classroom activities.
Niess, M., Staus, N. & Gillow-Wiles, H. (2011). Global Positioning Systems (GPS), Motion Detectors and Spreadsheets Enhance K-8 Teachers’ Mathematics Proficiency in the Context of Mathematical Functions. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2011--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4025-4032). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 24, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/36962/.
- Christie, A. (2007). Using GPS and geocaching engages, empowers, and enlightens K-12 teachers and students.-4031-Meridian, 10(1). Retrieved from http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/win2007/gps/index.htm.
- Erickson, F. (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. In J.L. Green, G. Camilli & P.B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of Complementary Methods in Educational Research (pp. 177-191). Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
- National Mathematics Advisory Board. (2008). Foundations for Success: Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Education. Retried from http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/reports.html
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. J Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, & B. Findell (Eds.). Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Niess, M.L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509-523.
- Niess, M.L. (2008). Knowledge needed for teaching with technologies– Call it TPACK, AMTE Connections, Spring, P. 9-10.
- Sawada, D., Piburn, M., Falconer, K., Turley, J., Benford, R., & Bloom, I. (2000). Reformed teaching observation protocol (RTOP) (ACEPT Technical Report No. IN00-1). Tempe, AZ: Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers.
- Sawada, D., Pilburn, M.D., Judson, E., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., & Bloom, I. (2002). Measuring reform practices in science and mathematics classrooms: The reformed teaching observation protocol. School Science and Mathematics, 102 (6), 245-254.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact email@example.com.