You are here:

Teacher education meets the 2.0 students
PROCEEDINGS

, , Department of Teacher Education and School Research, University of Oslo, Norway

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Nashville, Tennessee, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-84-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

In this paper we argue that teacher education programs need to further develop their own practices to meet the challenges of the 21.Century. We will in this paper give a review of the research within the field of teacher education and technology. Using a teacher training program (PPU) within the Department of Teacher Education and School Research at the University of Oslo as a discussion point, we will focus on the use of collaborative tools and the connection between different pedagogical perspectives and tasks.

Citation

Engelien, K. & Lund, A. (2011). Teacher education meets the 2.0 students. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2011--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1813-1818). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 25, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. An, H., & Kim, S. (2009). The Benefits and Limitations of Online GroupWork in a Teacher Education Program. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(2), 2465-2472.
  2. Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M.E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 417-436.
  3. Corcoran, E. (1981). Transition Shock. Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 19-23.
  4. Darling-Hammond, L., & Hammerness, K. (2002). Toward Expert Thinking: How Curriculum Case-writing prompts the development of theory-based professional knowledge in student teachers. Teaching Education, 13(2), 219-243.
  5. Doering, A., Hughes, J., Schmidt, D., Grandgenett, N., Margerum-Leys, J., & Scharber, C. (2007). TPCK in
  6. Ferdig, R.E. (2006). Assessing technologies for teaching and learning: understanding the importance of technological pedagogical content knowledge. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 749760.
  7. Grant, T.J., & Kline, K. (2010). The impact of video-based lesson analysis on teachers' thinking and practice. Teacher Development: An international journal of teachers’ professional development, 14(1), 69-83.
  8. Helleve, I. (2006). How can ICT and Learning Management Systems (LMS) support full time teacher education students in their collaborative learning processes? If ICT is the answer in teacher education-What
  9. Korthagen, F.A.J. (2010). How teacher education can make a difference. Journal of Education for Teaching: International research and pedagogy, 36(4), 407-423.
  10. Korthagen, F.A.J., & Kessels, J.P.A.M. (1999). Linking Theory and Practice: Changing the Pedagogy of Teacher Education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4-17.
  11. Kosnik, C. (2001). The Effects of an Inquiry-oriented Teacher Education Program on a Faculty Member: Some critical incidents and my journey. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 2(1), 65-80.
  12. Krumsvik, R. (2008). Educational technology, epistemology and discourses in curricula in Norway. US-China Education Review, 5.
  13. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Liu, M., Kalk, D., Kinney, L., Orr, G., & Reid, M. (2009). Web 2.0 and Its Use in Higher Education: A Review of Literature. Paper presented at the World Conference on E-Learning inCorporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2009, Vancouver, Canada.
  15. Lund, A., & Rasmussen, I. (2008). The right tool for the wrong task? Match and mismatch between first and
  16. Lund, A., & Rasmussen, I. (2010). Tasks 2.0: Education Meets Social Computing and Mass Collaboration. In D.
  17. Lyle, J. (2003). Stimulated recall: a report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 861-878.
  18. MacDonald, R. (2009). Supporting Learner-Centered ICT Integration: The Influence of Collaborative and Needs-Based Professional Development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(3), 315 DASHDASH
  19. McDiarmid, G.W., & Clevenger-Bright, M. (2008). Rethinking teacher capacity. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser & D.J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (3. Ed., pp. 134-156). New York: Routldge Taylor& Francis Group
  20. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017.
  21. Newhouse, C.P., Lane, J., & Brown, C. (2007). Reflecting on Teaching Practices using Digital Video
  22. Prusak, K., Dye, B., Graham, C., & Graser, S. (2010). Reliability of pre-service physical education teachers' coding of teaching videos using studiocode analysis software. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(1), 131-159.
  23. Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65-83.
  24. Rowe, V.C. (2009). Using video-stimulated recall as a basis for interviews: some experiences from the field. Music Education Research, 11(4), 425-437.
  25. Shulman, J.H. (1991). Teacher-Written Cases With Commentaries. In J.H. Shulman (Ed.), Case Methods in Teacher Education (pp. 131-152). New York: Teachers College Press.
  26. Shulman, J.H. (2002). Happy Accidents: Cases as Opportunities for Teacher Learning. Paper presented at the The annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Retrieved from http://cet.usc.edu/resources/teaching_learning/docs/happy_accidents.pdf Shulman, J.H. (Ed.). (1992). Case Methods in Teacher Education. New York: Teachers College Press.
  27. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  28. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
  29. The Ministry of Education and Research. (2009). Fact sheet: White Paper on Teacher Education “The teacher– the role and the education” (Report to the Storting No. 11 (2008-2009)) Principal elements. Retrieved from http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/KD/Vedlegg/stortingsmeldinger/Teacher_Education_Factsheet.pdf. Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived Problems of Beginning Teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143178.
  30. Warren Little, J. (2002). Locating learning in teachers' communities of practice: opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 917-946.
  31. Wilhelmsen, J., Ørnes, H., Kristiansen, T., & Breivik, J. (2009). Digitale utfordringer innen høyere utdanning. Norgesuniversitetes IKT-monitor. Tromsø : Norgesuniversitetet.
  32. Zeichner, K. (1987). Preparing reflective teachers: An overview of instructional strategies which have been employed in preservice teacher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(5), 565575.
  33. Zeichner, K., & Conklin, H.G. (2008). Teacher education programs as sites for teacher preparation In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser & D.J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (3. Ed., pp. 269-289). New York: Routhledge, Taylor& Francis Group and The Association

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.