You are here:

What Makes Preservice Teachers Trust Digital Technology?
PROCEEDINGS

, Albion College, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Nashville, Tennessee, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-84-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

With increased availability of technology, researchers and educators alike must try to understand why teachers choose to use technology for educational purposes. The Computers as Social Actors (CASA) hypothesis (Reeves and Nass, 1996; Nass and Moon, 2000) is used to extend the concept of trust in human-human relationships to trust in human-technology relationships. To explore what factors influence trust in and use of educational technology, an online instrument comprised of a trust in technology instrument created by the author and instruments measuring computer self-efficacy, general trust, risky behavior, and experience with technology was administered to 136 preservice teachers. Exploratory regression analyses found one of the most important factors in participants’ decision to trust and use educational technology in future classes was how positive a person’s experience with technology in teacher education classes.

Citation

Francis, A. (2011). What Makes Preservice Teachers Trust Digital Technology?. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2011--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1484-1491). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 24, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Dennett, D.C. (1987). The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
  2. Franken, R.E., Gibson, K.J., & Rowland, G.L. (1992). Sensation Seeking and the tendency to view the world as threatening. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 31-38.
  3. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th Ed.), Boston: Allyn & Baco
  4. Handler, M.G. (1993). Preparing new teachers to use computer technology: Perceptions and suggestions for teacher educators. Computers in Education, 20(2), 147-156.
  5. Hew, K.F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252.
  6. Hoy, W.K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2003). The conceptualization and measurement of faculty trust in schools: The Omnibus T-Scale. In W.K. Hoy & C.G. Miskel (Eds.), Studies in leading and organizing schools (pp. 181–208). Greenwich,
  7. Marakas, G.M., Yi, M.Y., & Johnson, R.D. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information System Research, 9:2, 126-163.
  8. Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  9. Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Ross, C., & Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers and Education, 51, 1523-1537.
  10. Murphy, C.A., Coover, D., and Owen, S.V. (1989) Development and validation of the computer self-efficacy scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 893-899.
  11. Nass, C. & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81-103.
  12. Oleda-Zapata, J. (2010, January 11). IPods and educational applications have Minnesota students giddy about learning. TwinCities.com Pioneer Press. Retrieved from http://www.twincities.com
  13. Reeves, B. & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York: Cambridge University Press/CSLI.
  14. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W.K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of thenature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70, 547-593.
  15. Turkle, S. (2005). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Yamagishi, T., (1986). The provision of sanctioning as a public good. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 51(1), P. 110-116.
  16. Zumwalt, K., & Craig, E. (2005). Teacher’s characteristics: Research on the demographic profile. In Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. (Eds.). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 111-156).

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.