You are here:

Game Changers for Teacher Education

, Arizona State University, United States ; , University of North Texas, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Nashville, Tennessee, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-84-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


Ideas for a new framework for teacher education are introduced based on three sets of forces that may radically transform the way educational researchers and practitioners see their world: 1. Complex Systems Knowledge, 2. Global Flatteners, and 3. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Complex systems knowledge is part of a new approach in science, a transformation in thinking now maturing that involves dynamical systems and evolutionary computational modeling. The global flatteners represent economic game changers brought about by the Internet and the changed business practices it allows. Finally, technological pedagogical content knowledge is emerging as an important integration of knowledge and skills at the heart of advanced professional practice in education. We offer these ideas as a conversation starter on the future of educator preparation and support.


Gibson, D. & Knezek, G. (2011). Game Changers for Teacher Education. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2011--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 929-942). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 18, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Beck, J., & Wade, M. (2004). Got game: How the gamer generation is reshaping business forever. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  2. Beinhocker, E. (2006). The origin of wealth: Evolution, complexity and the radical remaking of economics. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  3. Bjerede, M., Atkins, K., & Dede, C. (2010). Ubiquitous mobile technologies and the transformation of schooling. From
  4. Bransford, J. (2007). Preparing people for rapidly changing environments. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(1).
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.
  6. Carroll, T. (2009). Transforming schools Into 21st century learning environments: eSchool News.
  7. Carroll, T. (2010). Ideas to enhance the game changers line or argument. In D. Gibson (Ed.) (pp. Personal email). Stowe, VT: David Gibson.
  8. CED. (2009). Harnessing openness to improve research, teaching, and learning in higher education. Retrieved. From.-940 DASHDASH
  9. Davidson, C., & Goldberg, D. (2009). The Future of Learning Institutions in a Digital Age. Chicago, IL: John D. And Catherine T. MacArthur Foundationo. Document Number)
  10. Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the menaings of life. New York: Simon& Schuster.
  11. Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. New York: Viking Penguin.
  12. Friedman, T. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
  13. Gee, J. (2004). What VideoGames Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  14. Gibson, D. (2000). Complexity theory as a leadership framework. Montpelier, VT: VISMT Available: http://wwwvismtorg/pub/ComplexityandLeadershippdf
  15. Gibson, D. (2008). Make it a two-way connection: A response to "Connecting informal and formal learning experiences in the age of participatory media. Contemporary Issues in Technology& Teacher Education, 8(4), N.A.
  16. Gibson, D. (2010). Assessment and digital media learning:
  17. Holland, J. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
  18. Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Clinton, K., Weigel, M., & Robison, A. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st Century [Electronic Version]. New Media Literacies Project, 72. Retrieved April 5, 2009, from Kauffman, S. (2000). Investigations. New York: Oxford University Press.
  19. Kauffman, S. (2010). Reinventing the sacred: A new view of science, reason, and religion. New York: Basic Books.
  20. Kelly, M. (2010). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): A Content Analysis of 2006-2009 Print Journal Articles. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2010, San Diego: CA.
  21. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd edition).
  22. Lemke, J., & Sabelli, N. (2008). Complex systems and educational change: Towards a new research agenda. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 118-129.
  23. Manning, P.K. (1995). The challenges of postmodernism. In In J Van Maanen (Ed) Representation in ethnography Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  24. McLaughlin, M.W. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. In Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis Vol 9, No 2 pp 171-178.
  25. McNeill, W. (1998). History and the scientific worldview. Hisotry and Theory, 37(1), 113.
  26. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  27. Morgan, P. (1995). Reconceiving the foundations of education: An ecological model. In F. Margonis (Ed.), Philosophy of education (Yearbook). Urbana-Champaign, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.
  28. Newman, D.V. (1996). Emergence and strange attractors. Philosophy of Science, 63(2), 245-261.
  29. Patton, M. (2011). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  30. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5).
  31. Prigogine, I. (1996). The end of certainty: Time, chaos, and the new laws of nature.
  32. Putnam, H. (1992). Renewing philosophy.
  33. Radzicki, M.J. (2003). Mr. Hamilton, Mr. Forrester, and a Foundation for Evolutionary Economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 37(1), 133-173.
  34. Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R., & Smith, B. (1994). The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization. New York, NY: Currency Doubleday.
  35. Senge, P.M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. NewYork: Doubleday.
  36. Tetenbaum, T.J. (1998). Shifting paradigms: from Newton to chaos. Organizational Dynamics, 26(4), 21-32.
  37. Thagard, P. (2000). Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  38. Wicks, D. (1998). Organizational structures as recursively constructed systems of agency and constraint: compliance and resistance in the context of structural conditions. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology v35(3), 369-390.
  39. You, Y. (1993). What can we learn from chaos theory? An alternative approach to instructional systems design. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 41 (3), 17-32.
  40. Zimmerman, D. (1995). A systems approach to assessing school culture. In In Assessment in the learning organization: Shifting the paradigm Costa, A and Kallick, B (eds) Alexandria, VA: Association for supervision and curriculum development.-942 DASHDASH

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact