You are here:

Hybrid Mode of Instruction in a Business School: Deployment Parameter and Reference
PROCEEDINGS

, Centro Escolar University, Philippines

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Orlando, Florida, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-83-9 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Abstract

Technology adaptation in the teaching and learning process is a plan-in-progress, not a finished goal. The move goes from the traditional, to hybrid, and to fully-online mode of instruction. Such move may redefine the quality of teaching in the academe. Koehler & Mishra’s Technology, Pedagogy and Content knowledge approach (TPCK) and The Three Universal Processes of the Juran’s Quality Trilogy: quality planning, control and implementation, guided the 162 tertiary students of Centro Escolar University in the quality assessment of the hybrid mode of instruction deployment, specifically, the parameter and reference. The study is a cyclic assessment of the level of hybrid adaptation, knowledge competency and quality improvement matrix to make the hybrid mode of instruction deployment standard, flawless, and both efficient and effective to enhance student learning.

Citation

Dellosa, L.R. (2010). Hybrid Mode of Instruction in a Business School: Deployment Parameter and Reference. In J. Sanchez & K. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2010--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 937-946). Orlando, Florida, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 24, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education.
  2. Cavanaugh, C., & Blomeyer, B. (2007). What works in K-12 online learning. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
  3. Dillman, D.A. (2007). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. Enriquez Amelito, (2010). Assessing the Effectiveness of Synchronous Content Delivery in an Online
  4. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131152.
  5. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). New York: Routledge.
  6. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  7. Shulman, L. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3-36). New York: MacMillan.
  8. Watson, J., & Ryan, J. (2006). Keeping pace with k-12 online learning: A review of state-level policy and practice. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.