CITE Journal Volume 11, Number 1, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA
Video games are increasingly popular with youth though scarcely evident in schools. Serious video games, or those that simulate the real world, motivate players, require decision-making, and encourage student learning about an issue, have the potential to educate students about global issues. Global education, given its heritage as an experiential, contemporary, and issues-centered education, would seem to be an ideal point of entry for such serious video games since their educational aims are one and the same. This study examines teacher reflective experiences with serious video games that have a global orientation. Findings are clustered around data categories, including skepticism about pedagogical value of video games, openness to global learning available through this medium, and tensions between representational complexity and realism. This study contributes to what is known about teacher thinking in relation to the pedagogical use of video games, particularly those focused on global content, and includes implications for teaching and research.
Gaudelli, W. & Taylor, A. (2011). Modding the global classroom? Serious video games and teacher reflection. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 11(1), 70-91. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved January 22, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/35439/.
© 2011 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education
- Anderson, C.A., & Dill, K.E. (2000). Videogames and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behaviors in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 772-790.
- Cuban, L. (1986). Teaching and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Calderhead, J. (1989). Reflective teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(1), 43-51.
- Calderhead, J. (1992). The role of reflection in learning to teach. In L. Valli (Ed), Reflective teacher education: Cases and critiques (pp. 139-146). Albany, NY: State
- Cherryholmes, C.H. (1966). Some current research on effectiveness of educational simulations: Implications on alternative strategies. American Behavioral Scientist, 10(2), 4-7.
- Clegg, A.A. (1991). Games and simulations in social studies education. In J.P. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 523-528). New
- Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- DeFreitas, S., & Jarvis, J. (2007). Serious games—engaging training solutions: A research development project for supporting training needs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 523-525.
- Dussel, I. (2009). Education and the production of global imaginaries: A reflection on teachers’ visual culture. Yearbook for the National Society for the Study of Education, 108(2), 89-110.
- Fendler, L. (2003). Teacher reflection in a hall of mirrors: Historical influences and political reverberations. Educational Researcher, 32(3), 16-25.
- Friedman, A., & VanFossen, P.J. (2010). The Internet in social studies classrooms: Lost opportunity or unexplored frontier? In R. Diem& M.K. Berson (Eds.), Technology in retrospect: Social studies in the information age 1984-2009 (pp. 51-74). Charlotte, NC:
- Gaudelli, W. (2007). Global education. In S. Mathison & E.W. Ross’s (Eds.), Battleground schools. Oxford, England: Greenwood Press. Gee, J.P. (2003a). High score education. Games, not schools, are teaching kids to think. Wired, 11(5). Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.05/view.html
- Hanvey, R.G. (1976). An attainable global perspective. New York, NY: Center for War/Peace Studies.
- Johnson, P.R. (2005). Perceptions of leadership among high school students: Simulation versus face-to-face environments (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
- Joseph, B. (2010). Get serious: Games that address contemporary social and global issues. School Library Journal, 56(2), 24-25.
- Lamy, S.L. (1987). The definition of a discipline: The objects and methods of analysis in global education. New York, NY: Global Perspectives in Education, Inc.
- Maerhoff, G.I. (2002). A classroom of one. New York, NY: Palgrave.
- Merryfield, M.M. (1998). Pedagogy for global perspectives in education: Studies of teachers’ thinking and practice. Theory and Research in Social Education, 26(3), 342379.
- Pike, G., & Selby, D. (1999). In the global classroom (Vol. 1 & 2). Toronto, Canada: Pippen Publishing.
- Popkewitz, T.S. (1980). Global education as a slogan system. Curriculum Inquiry, 10(3), 303-315.
- Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On The Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
- Rice, J.W. (2007). Assessing higher-order thinking skills in videogames. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(1), 87-100.
- Sandholtz, J.H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D.C (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student centered classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Sandler, L. (2003). Game boy. New Republic, 228(7), 38-39. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, ()
- Schon, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Schon, D.A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Segall, A., & Gaudelli, W. (2007). Reflecting socially on social issues in a social studies methods course. Teaching Education, 18(1), 77-92.
- Shaffer, D.W., Squire, K.R., Halverson, R., & Gee, J.P. (2005). Videogames and the future of learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(2), 104-111.
- Squire, K.D. (2003). Videogames in education. International Journal of Intelligent Simulations and Gaming, 1(2), 49-62.
- Squire, K.D. (2006). From content to context: Videogames as designed experience. Educational Researcher, 25(8), 19-29.
- Stone, L. (1992). The essentialist tension in reflective teacher education. In L. Valli (Ed.), Reflective teacher education: Cases and critiques (pp. 198-211). Albany, NY: State
- Werner, W. (2000). Reading authorship into texts, Theory and Research in Social Education, 28(2), 193-219.
- Werner, W. (2002). Reading visual texts. Theory and Research in Social Education, 30(3), 401-428.
- Werner, W., & Case, R. (1997). Themes in global education. In I. Wright& A. Sears (Eds.), Trends and issues in Canadian social studies education (pp. 176-194). Vancouver,
- Yeager, E.A., Davis, O.L., & Foster, S.J. (2001). Historical empathy and perspective taking in social studies. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
- Zeichner, K & Liston, D. (1996). Reflective teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Zeichner, K. (1996). Teachers as reflective practitioners and the democratization of school reform. In K. Zeichner, S. Melnick, & M L. Gomez (Eds.), Currents of reform in preservice teacher education (pp. 199-214). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact email@example.com.
Using Educational Computer Games in the Classroom: Science Teachers’ Experiences, Attitudes, Perceptions, Concerns, and Support Needs
Yun-Jo An, Linda Haynes, Adriana D’Alba & Frances Chumney, University of West Georgia, United States
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 16, No. 4 (December 2016) pp. 415–433
Michael Scarlett, Augustana College, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (Mar 02, 2015) pp. 838–840
Jonathan List, The University of Akron, United States; Brent Bryant, Northern Potter School District, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014 (Mar 17, 2014) pp. 2384–2388
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.