You are here:

Teacher’s Self-efficacy and the Integration of Web 2.0 Tool/Applications in K-12 Schools
PROCEEDINGS

, , Ohio University, Taiwan

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in San Diego, CA, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-78-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

Web 2.0 tools/ applications are available online and have become prevalent telecommunication tools among the digital generations or so called Digital Natives (Prensky, 2001). American youth grow up embracing electronic communication devices and tools, such as the Internet, cell phones, online games and iPods; they are familiar with these digital tools and participating in the Web 2.0 environment for their personal needs and schoolwork (Lemke, Coughlin, Garcia, Reifsneider, & Baas, 2009). The utilization of Web 2.0 tools/ applications in K-12 schools is facilitating students in their academic learning and is an unavoidable trend. This study focuses on the investigation of the current use of the Web 2.0 tools/ applications in American public K-12 classrooms for learning the practical classroom situation.

Citation

Pan, S.C. & Franklin, T. (2010). Teacher’s Self-efficacy and the Integration of Web 2.0 Tool/Applications in K-12 Schools. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2010--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2830-2837). San Diego, CA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 17, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Albion, P.R. (2008). Web 2.0 in teacher education: Two imperatives for action. Computers in the Schools, 25(3), 181-198.
  2. Anderson P. (2007) What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for Education, JISC Technology& Standards Watch. Retrieved February 24, 2009, from: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf Berners-Lee, Tim. (1999). Weaving the Web: The original design and ultimate destiny of the WorldWide Web by its inventor. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco.
  3. Buffington, L.M. (2008). Creating and consuming Web 2.0 in art education. Computers in the Schools, 25(3), 303-313.
  4. Bull, G., Hammond, T., & Ferster, B. (2008). Developing Web 2.0 tools for support of historical inquiry in social studies. Computers in the Schools, 25(3), 275-287.
  5. Busch, T., Byer, D., Cator, K., Fadel, C., Fletcher, G., Fox, C...(2007). Maximizing the impact the pivotal role of technology in a 21st century education system. Retrieved June 9, 2009 from http://www.setda.org/c/document_library/get_file?folderId=191&Name=P21Book_complete.pdf
  6. Carvin, A. (2005). Tim Berners-Lee: Weaving a semantic web. Retrieved May 18, 2009, from http://www.digitaldivide.net/articles/view.php?ArticleID=20 Culp, K.M., Honey, M., Mandinach, E., & Bailey, J. (2003). A Retrospective on Twenty Years of Education Technology Policy. Retrieved July 14, 2009, from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/os/technology/plan/2004/site/docs_and_pdf/20yearsdocrevised.pdf
  7. Farris-Berg, K. (2005). Listening to student voices on technology: Today's tech-savvy students are stuck in textdominated schools. Retrieved June 2, 2009, from http://www.educationevolving.org/pdf/tech_savy_students.pdf Friedman, T.L. (2006). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century [updated and expanded]. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
  8. Jonassen, D., Howland, J., Marra, R.M., & Crismond, D. (2008). Meaningful learning with technology (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
  9. Jones, S., & Madden, M. (2002). The Internet goes to college: How students are living in the future with today’s technology. Retrieved July 01, 2009, from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2002/PIP_College_Report.pdf.pdf Lemke, C., Coughlin, E., Garcia, L., Reifsneider, D., & Baas, J. (2009). Leadership for Web 2.0 in Education: Promise and Reality. Culver City, CA: Metiri Group. Commissioned by CoSN through support from the John D. And Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.
  10. Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL Dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  11. Metiri Group. (2009). National trends report: Enhancing education through technology (EETT) Round 6, Fiscal Year 2007. The State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA). Washington, DC. Retrieved May22, 2009 from http://www.setda.org/c/document_library/get_file?folderId=6&Name=DLFE-329.pdf
  12. Project Tomorrow. (2008). Speak Up 2007 for Students, Teachers, Parents& School Leaders Selected National Findings-April 8, 2008. Retrieved July 10, 2009, from http://www.tomorrow.org/docs/National%20Findings%20Speak%20Up%202007.pdf Project Tomorrow. (2009). Learning in the 21st Century: 2009 Trends Update. Retrieved July 15, 2009, from http://www.blackboard.com/resources/k-12/Bb_K12_09_TrendsUpdate.pdf
  13. Richardson,W. (2006). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful Web tools for classrooms.Thousand Oaks, CA, Corwin Press.
  14. Rosen, D., & Nelson, C. (2008). Web 2.0: A new generation of learners and education. Computers in the Schools, 25(3), 211-225.
  15. Rosenbloom, A. (2004). The blogosphere. Communications of the ACM, 47(12), 31-33.
  16. Simonson, M. (2007). Course management systems. The quarterly review of distance education, 8(1), vii-ix.
  17. Solomon, G., & Schrum, L. (2007). Web 2.0: New tools, new schools. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
  18. U.S. Department of Education (2004). Toward a new golden age in American education: How the Internet, the Law and Today's Students Are Revolutionizing Expectations. Retrieved July 14, 2009, from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/os/technology/plan/2004/plan.pdf Vogel, T., & Goans, D. (2005). Delivering the news with blogs: the Georgia State University library experience. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 10(1), 5-27.
  19. Wells, J., and Lewis, L. (2006). Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools and Classrooms: 1994–2005. (NCES 2007-020). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
  20. Williams, B. (2007). Educator’s podcast guide. Eugene, Or. : International Society for Technology in Education.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.