You are here:

A Survey of Professional Development via Distance Teaching and Learning PROCEEDINGS

, , , Technion, Israel

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in San Diego, CA, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-78-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

In the last decade, distance learning has become an integral part of professional development. Unlike a traditional classroom, a virtual classroom is a teaching and learning environment located within a computer-mediated communication system. Distance learning enables the learner to be flexible with respect to time and distance and provides for individual adaptation of the domains of interest, pace, and academic level. Teaching online is different from teaching face-to-face and needs its own set of pedagogies. The literature review indicates that factors examined in distance learning studies refer to learner characteristics, such as extent of the learner's participation in the learning process, views and attitudes towards distance learning, academic achievements, and the effectiveness of technology usage. Characteristics and findings of various studies as well as teachers' role and professional development in an era of virtual classrooms are reviewed and analyzed.

Citation

Dori, Y.J., Herscovitz, O. & Kaberman, Z. (2010). A Survey of Professional Development via Distance Teaching and Learning. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2010--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 412-419). San Diego, CA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 18, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Allen, E. & Seaman, J. (2005). Growing by degrees: Online education in the United States. Sloan Consortium (Sloan-C) [online]. Available at: http://www.sloan-C.org/resources/growing_by_degrees.pdf Allen, E. & Seaman, J.(2006). Making the grade: Online education in the United States. Sloan Consortium (Sloan-C) [online]. Available at: http://www.sloan-C.org/publications/survey/index.asp
  2. Allen, E., Seaman, J. & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States. Sloan Consortium (Sloan-C) [online]. Available at: http://www.sloanc.org/publications/survey/pdf/Blending
  3. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison D.R. & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conference context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.
  4. Andrews, R. & Haythornthwaite, C. (2007). The sage handbook of e-learning research. L.A: Sage Publications.
  5. Banks, F. (2003). TeachandLearn.net: Using new technology to support D & T teachers. In: Proceedings of the PATT-13 Conference, 21-24 June 2003, Glasgow, UK.(cid:1) (cid:1) http://oro.open.ac.uk/8379/1/PATT.pdf Bates, A.R. & Khasawneh, S. (2007). Self efficacy and college students' perception and use of online learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 3(1), 175-191.
  6. Bonk, C.J. & Cummings, J.A. (1998). A dozen recommendations for placing the student at the centre of Web-based learning. Educational Media International, 35(2), 82–89.
  7. Compton, L., Davis, N., & Mackey, J. (2009). Field Experience with a Virtual School’s Teacher: How can it be done?. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2009 (pp. 323-328). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  8. Cooper, L. (2001). A comparison of online and traditional computer applications class. Technological Horizons in Education Journal, 28, 52-64.
  9. Davis, N. & Niederhauser, D. (2006). Preparing teachers for K-12 distance learning: roles and strategies. 22nd Annual conference on distance teaching and learning, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  10. Davis, N. & Roblyer, M.D. (2005). Preparing teachers for the "Schools that Technology Built": Evaluation of a program to train teachers for virtual schooling. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(4), 399-409.
  11. De Laat, M.F. & Lally, V. (2004). It's not so easy: Researching the complexity of emergent participant roles and awareness in asynchronous networked learning discussions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(3), 165-171.
  12. De Laat, M.F., Lally, V., Lipponen, L. & Simons, R.J. (2007). Online teaching in networked learning communities: A multi-method approach to studying the role of the teacher. Instructional Science, 35, 257-286.
  13. Deubel, P. (2008). K-12 Online Teaching Endorsements: Are They Needed? THE Journal– Transforming Education through Technology. Available: http://thejournal.com/articles/2008/01/10/k-12-online-teaching-endorsements-are-they-needed.aspx Del Valle, R. & Duffy, T.M. (2009).(cid:1) Online learning: Learner characteristics and their approaches to managing learning. Instructional Science, 37, 129-149.
  14. Eshet, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106.
  15. Eshet-Alkalai, Y. & Geri, N. (2007). Does the medium affect the message? The influence of text representation format on critical thinking. Human Systems Management, 26(4), 269-279.
  16. Faux, T. & Blach-Hugh, C. (2000). A comparison of using the Internet versus lectures to teach social work history. Research on Social Work Practice, 10, 454-467.
  17. Fishman, B., Edelson, D., & Konstantopoulos, S. (2004). The impact of online professional development: An experimental study of professional development modalities linked to curriculum (Proposal submitted to the U.S. National Science Foundation, Funded as ESI-0455582). Ann Arbor,(cid:1) MI: The University of Michigan.
  18. Frederickson, N., Reed, P. & Clifford, V. (2005). Evaluating web-supported learning versus lecturebased teaching: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Higher Education, 50, 645–664.
  19. Goodyear, P. (2002). Teaching online. In N. Hativa& P. Goodyear, eds, Teacher Thinking, Beliefs and Knowledge in Higher Education, pp. 79–101. Kluwer: Dordrecht.
  20. Goodyear, P., Salmon, G., Spector, J.M., Steeples, C. & Tickner, S. (2001). Competencies for online teaching: A special report. Educational Technology, Research and Development 49(1), 65–72.
  21. Harasim, L., Hiltz, S.R., Teles, L. & Turoff, M. (1997). Learning networks: A field guide to teaching and learning online. Cambridge, MA: MITT Press.
  22. Hiltz, S.R. (1994). The Virtual Classroom– Learning Without Limits via Computer Networks. Ablex Publicating Corporation, Norwood, New Jersey.
  23. Kumta, S., Tsang, P., Hung, L. & Cheng, I. (2003). Fostering critical thinking skill through a webbased tutorial program for final year medical students– a randomized controlled study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(3), 267-273.
  24. Kurtz, G., Amichai-Hamburger, Y. & Kantor, J. (2009). Psychosocial well-being of Israeli students and attitudes toward open and distance learning. International Review of Research in Open Distance Learning, 10(2).
  25. Machtmes, K. & Asher, J.W. (2000). A meta-analysis of effectiveness of telecourses in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 14, 27-46.
  26. Moore M.G. & Anderson W.G. (Eds.) (2003). Handbook of distance education. Ahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  27. North American Council of Online Learning (2007). National standards for quality of online courses. Available: http://www.nacol.org/nationalstandards/ Spencer, C. (2006). Research on learners' preferences for reading from a printed text or from a computer screen. Journal of distance Education, 21(1), 33-50.
  28. Stodel, E.J., Thompson, T.L. & MacDonald, C. (2006). Learners' perspectives on what is missing from online learning: Interpretations through the community of inquiry framework. International Review of Research in Open Distance Learning, 7(3), 1-24.
  29. Van Slyke, C., Kittner, M. & Belanger, F. (1998). Identifying Candidates for Distance Education: a Telecommuting Perspective. Proceedings of the America's Conference on Information Systems. Baltimore, 666-668.
  30. Whittington, N. (1987). Is Instructional Television Educationally Effective? A Research Review. American Journal of distance Education, 1(1), 47-57.
  31. Willis, B. (1994). Enhancing Faculty Effectiveness in Distance Education. In Willis, B.(Ed.) Distance Education –Strategies and Tools. Educational technology publications Englewood cliffs, New Jersey.
  32. Yeh, Y.C. (2009). Integrating e-learning into Direct-instruction Model to enhance the effectiveness of critical-thinking instruction. Instructional Science, 37, 185-203.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.