You are here:

Putting the T in PCK: Exploring the Nature of the TPACK Framework Among K-12 Online Educators Using a Web-Based Survey
PROCEEDINGS

, Arizona State University, United States ; , University of Nevada Las Vegas, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Charleston, SC, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-67-9 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

With the ubiquitous nature of the Internet, web-based surveys are becoming increasingly popular. In addition to being low cost, Web-based surveys have the advantage of format and response control, being able to offer multiple response cycles, and the convenience of having responses automatically collected via a database application to reduce data entry error. Using a Web-based survey methodology (Dillman, 2007), this study examined a national sample of 596 K-12 online teachers and measured their knowledge with respect to three key domains as described by the TPACK framework: technology, pedagogy, content, and the combination of each of these areas. Findings indicated that knowledge ratings are highest among the domains of pedagogy, content, and pedagogical content.

Citation

Archambault, L. & Oh-Young, C. (2009). Putting the T in PCK: Exploring the Nature of the TPACK Framework Among K-12 Online Educators Using a Web-Based Survey. In I. Gibson, R. Weber, K. McFerrin, R. Carlsen & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2009--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4008-4014). Charleston, SC, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 19, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Andrews, D., Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2003). Electronic survey methodology: A case study in reaching hard to involve internet users. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16(2), 185-210.
  2. Dillman, D.A. (2007). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (Second ed.). New York: Wiley.
  3. Fowler, J. (2002). Survey research methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
  4. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131152.
  5. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  6. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  7. Shulman, L. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3-36). New York: MacMillan.
  8. Watson, J. (2005). Keeping pace with k-12 online learning: A review of state-level policy and practice. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. The Validation of an Instrument Measuring TPACK

    Nicolette Burgoyne, Charles R. Graham & Richard Sudweeks, Brigham Young University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (Mar 29, 2010) pp. 3787–3794

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.