You are here:

Evaluating the Pedagogical Value of Blended Learning in Informatics and Mathematics Education: A Comparative Study

, University of Agder; Faculty of Technology & Sciences, Department of Mathematics and Sciences, Norway

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Vienna, Austria ISBN 978-1-880094-65-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC


Blended learning is a growing trend among higher educational institutions. It has begun to change the nature of teaching and learning through an appropriate mixing of face-to-face learning and information technologies, which have impacted learning by providing a means of access to online resources. However, just mixing information technologies with face-to-face learning is not sufficient to exploit the potentialities of blended learning. To be successful, blended learning needs a pedagogically sound model based learning theories and pedagogical strategies. To evaluate the pedagogical value of blended learning environments a comparative study is proposed. This paper examines students’ perceptions of blended learning in two different courses where students completed survey questionnaires.


Hadjerrouit, S. (2008). Evaluating the Pedagogical Value of Blended Learning in Informatics and Mathematics Education: A Comparative Study. In J. Luca & E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2008--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 3751-3760). Vienna, Austria: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 19, 2018 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Aspden, L. & Helm, P. (2004). Making the connection in a blended learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(3), 245-252.
  2. Ben-David Kolikant, Y., & Pollack, S. (2004). Establishing computer science norms among high school students. Computer Science Education, 14(1), 21-35.
  3. Bonk, C.J., & Graham, C.R. (2006). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
  4. Drafan, E.A. & Rainger, P. (2006). A model for the identification of challenges to blended learning. Research in Learning Technology, 14(1), 55-67.
  5. Duffy, T.M., Lowyck, J., & Jonassen, D.H. (1993). Designing environments for constructive learning. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  6. Dyson, M.C., & Campello, S.B. (2003). Evaluating virtual learning environments: What are we measuring? Electronic Journal of E-learning, 1(1), 11-20.
  7. Garrison, D.R. & Kunuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education 7, 95-105.
  8. Karagiorgi, Y., & Symeou, L. (2005). Translating constructivism into instructional design: Potential and limitations. Educational Technology& Society, 8(1), 17-27.
  9. Kerres, M. & DeWitt, C. (2003). A didactical framework for the design of blended learning arrangements. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2-3), 101-113.
  10. Lin, B., & Hsieh, C. (2001). Web-based teaching and learner control: A research review. Computers& Education, 37(3-4), 377-386.
  11. Luca, J. (2006). Using blended learning to enhance teaching and learning. Proceedings of the 8th Australian Conference on Computing Education, 52, 3-4.
  12. Mayes, J.T., & Fowler, C.J. (1999). Learning technology and usability: A framework for understanding courseware. Interacting with Computers, 11(5), 485-497.
  13. Mcdougali, A., & Boyle, M. (2004). Students strategies for learning computer programming: Implications for pedagogy in informatics. Education and Information Technologies 9(2), 109-116.
  14. Nilsen, J. (2000). Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity. New York: New Riders.
  15. Osguthorpe, R. & Graham, C. (2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227-233.
  16. Piaget, J. (1969). Judgment and reasoning in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  17. Roberts, G. (2003). Teaching using the web: Conceptions and approaches from a phenomenographic Perspective. Instructional Science 31, 127-150.
  18. Shee, D.Y., & Wang, Y-S. (2008). Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e-learning system: A methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications. Computers& Education 50, 894-905.
  19. Shiratuddin, N., & Shahizan, H. (2003). A usability study for promoting eContent in higher education. Educational Technology& Society, 6(4), 112-114.
  20. Stacey, E. & Gerbic, P. (2007). Teaching for blended learning– Research perspectives from on-campus and distance students. Education and Information Technologies, 12, 165-174.
  21. Steffe, L.P., & Gale, J. (Eds.) (1995). Constructivism in education. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  22. Storey, M.A., Phillips, B., Maczewski, M., & Wang, M. (2002). Evaluating the usability of web-based learning tools. Educational Technology& Society, 5(3), 91-100.
  23. Vygotsy, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact