You are here:

The Orientation of University Freshmen Through a Blended Approach
PROCEEDINGS

, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong ; , , The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Vienna, Austria ISBN 978-1-880094-65-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

Orientation serves to help freshmen to make the switch from a school to a university learning environment. However, conventional face-to-face orientation is limited in what can be disseminated and how effectively students are inducted. A case is discussed in which freshmen experienced a blended approach to orientation. Reflecting on the process, teachers observed that this cohort of students was better prepared for subsequent university life. Furthermore, these students, who had already had considerable exposure to the Web environment, experienced little technical challenge.

Citation

Hodgson, P., So, K.Y. & Hung, P. (2008). The Orientation of University Freshmen Through a Blended Approach. In J. Luca & E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2008--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 2925-2930). Vienna, Austria: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 19, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Felder, R.M. And Silverman, L.K. (1988). ‘Learning and teaching styles in engineering education’. Engineering Education 78(7), 674–81. [The article that originally defined the Felder–Silverman model and identified teaching practices that should meet the needs of students with the full spectrum of styles. The paper is preceded by a 2002 preface that states and explains changes in the model that have been made since 1988. Http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felders/public/Papers/LS1988.pdf.]
  2. Graham, C.R., Allen, S. And Ure, D. (2003). ‘Blended learning environments: a review of the research literature’. Retrieved from http://msed.byu.edu/ipt/graham/vita/ble_litrev.pdf.
  3. Jelfs, A., Nathan, R. And Barrett, C. (2004). ‘Scaffolding students: suggestions on how to equip students with the necessary study skills for studying in a blended learning environment’. Journal of Educational Media 29(2), 85.
  4. Miller, M.T. And Pope, M.L. (2003). ‘Integrating technology into new student orientation programs at community colleges’. Community College Journal of Research& Practice 27(1), 15.
  5. Mina, M. And Gerdes, R.M. (2006). ‘The pedantic 21st century freshman engineering student’. European Journal of Engineering Education 31(5), 509–16.
  6. Osguthorpe, R.T. And Graham, C.R. (2003). ‘Blended learning environments: definitions and directions’. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 4(3), 227–33.
  7. O'Shea, J. (2006). ‘Helping students make the transition from school to university: the National University of Ireland– Maynooth experience’. Retrieved from http://www.engsc.ac.uk/downloads/helm/proceedings/session7a_oshea.doc.
  8. Scagnoli, N.I. (2001). ‘Student orientations for online programs’. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 34(1), 19–27.
  9. Solbrekke, T. And Karseth, B. (2006). ‘Professional responsibility— an issue for higher education?’ Higher Education, 52(1), 95–119.
  10. Tickell, G. And Smyrnios, K. (2005). ‘Predictors of tertiary accounting students’ academic performance: a comparison of year 12-to-university students with TAFE-to-university students’. Journal of Higher Education Policy& Management 27(2), 239–59.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.