The Development of Teacher TPCK by Instructional Approach: Tools, Videocase, and Problems of Practice
Joan Hughes, University of Texas at Austin, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-64-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA
This study examined the development of teachers' knowledge about technology during a course that used three distinct instructional approaches to teaching teachers about technology integration. The purpose was to better understand how the instructional approaches facilitate teachers' perspectives about and knowledge of technology integration for K-12 instruction. The three approaches included: (a) learning technological tools and then connecting those tools to content areas, (b) examining online video cases that demonstrate K-12 teachers using technology in support of student learning, and (c) using teachers' problems of practice to anchor investigation of technological solutions. The results indicate the latter two approaches assist teachers in learning to use technology to teach content. Teacher educators who design graduate level courses or professional development opportunities must understand how instructional approaches may limit or privilege development of TPCK.
Hughes, J. (2008). The Development of Teacher TPCK by Instructional Approach: Tools, Videocase, and Problems of Practice. In K. McFerrin, R. Weber, R. Carlsen & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2008--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 5227-5234). Las Vegas, Nevada, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 27, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/28108/.
- Abell, S.K., Cennamo, K.S., Anderson, M.A., Bryan, L.A., Campbell, L.M., & Hug, W. (1996). Integrated media classroom cases in elementary science teacher education. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 15(1-2), 137-151.
- Authors (2006). Assessing technology integration: The RAT – Replacement, Amplification, and Transformation-Framework. Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, Orlando, AACE.
- Baker, E., & Wedman, J. (1999, December). Preservice literacy teachers, digital literacy portfolios, and multimedia case-based instruction: Examining the theoretical basis for case-based instruction. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Orlando, FL.
- Borko, H., & Putnam, R.T. (1995). Expanding a Teacher's Knowledge Base. In T.R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education (pp. 35-65). New York: Teachers College Press.
- Borko, H., & Putnam, R.T. (1996). Learning to teach. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673-708). New York: Macmillan.
- Bransford, J.D., & Schwartz, D.L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. In A. Iran-Nejad & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (pp. 61-100). Washington, DC:
- Carter, K. (1990). Teachers' knowledge and learning to teach. In W.R. Houston, M. Huberman & J. Sikula (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 291-310). New York: MacMillan.
- Carter, K. (1999). What is a case? What is not a case? In M.A. Lundeberg, B.A. Levin& H.L. Harrington (Eds.), Who learns what from cases and how? (pp. 165-176). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S.L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in 306). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
- Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M.W. (1996). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. In M.W. McLaughlin& I. Oberman (Eds.), Teacher learning: New policies, new practices (pp. 202-218). New York: Teachers College.
- Drier, H.S. (2001, March). Beliefs, experiences, and reflections that affect the development of techno-mathematical knowledge. Paper presented at the SITE, Orlando, FL.
- Dun, A., Feldman, A., & Rearick, M. (2000, April). Teaching and learning with computers in schools: The development of instructional technology pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA), New Orleans, LA.
- Fenstermacher, G.D. (1994). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 20, pp. 3-56). Washington DC: American
- Grossman, P.L. (1988). A study in contrast: Sources of pedagogical content knowledge for secondary English. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
- Horvath, J.K., & Lehrer, R. (2000). The Design of a Case-based Hypermedia Teaching Tool. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 5(2), 115-141.
- Hughes, J.E. (2000). Teaching English with technology: Exploring teacher learning and practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
- Hughes, J.E. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences informing technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 277-302.
- Hughes, J.E., & Scharber, C. (2008). Leveraging the development of English TPCK within the deictic nature of literacy. In T.A.C.O.I.A. Technology (Ed.), Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators (Vol. 1, pp. 87-106). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Hughes, J.E., Thomas, R., & Scharber, C. (2006). Assessing technology integration: The RAT – Replacement, Amplification, and Transformation-Framework. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, Orlando.
- Margerum-Leys, J., & Marx, R.W. (2002). Teacher knowledge of educational technology: a case study of student/mentor teacher pairs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(4), 427-462.
- McKenzie, J. (2001). Head of the class. Retrieved January 22, 2001, from http://www.electronic-school.com
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
- Munby, H., Russell, T., & Martin, A.K. (2001). Teachers' knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (Vol. 4, pp. 877-904). Washington, DC: American Educational
- Norton, S., McRobbie, C.J., & Cooper, T.J. (2000). Exploring secondary mathematics teachers' reasons for not using computers in their teaching: Five case studies. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(1), 87-109.
- Pea, R.D. (1985). Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychologist, 20(4), 167-182.
- Reinking, D. (1997). Me and my hypertext:) A multiple digression analysis of technology and literacy (sic). The Reading Teacher, 50(8), 626-643.
- Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), The Handbook for Research on Teaching (Fourth Edition) (pp. 905-947). Washington, DC: AERA.
- Sandholtz, J.H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D.C. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
- Wood, J.M. (1998, December). Redefining literacy instruction in the digital age: Profiles of 3 exemplary teachers. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Austin, TX.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
I Know I Am Supposed To, But I Just Can’t: Insights into Technology Integration in Science Classrooms
Richard Hechter & Laurie Anne Vermette, University of Manitoba, Canada
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (Mar 07, 2011) pp. 4112–4114
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact email@example.com.