The Voices of North Carolina Professional Development Initiative: A New Literacies Approach to Teaching Language Effectively in the Middle Grades
Carl Young, John Lee, Carol Pope, Candy Beal, Walt Wolfram, Jeff Reaser, NC State University, United States ; Sheryl Long, North Carolina State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-64-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA
This paper describes a professional development initiative facilitated by university faculty aimed at providing middle grades teachers with an innovative new literacies approach to teaching language more effectively. Teachers were provided with ongoing instruction and support, as well as a research-based language curriculum, allowing them to maximize the limited amount of time given to language instruction. Instead of focusing on decontextualized grammar activities, facilitators provided teachers with content knowledge, pedagogical strategies, and new technologies so they, in turn, could have students engage in language exploration and awareness integrated with local, regional, and state culture and history. Results included a more sophisticated understanding of and respect for language variations and contexts, and an increased awareness of Standard English. Research focused on the extent to which an implicit TPCK approach, including research-based curricula, innovative pedagogy, and newer technologies, affected teachers' ability to teach language effectively.
Young, C., Lee, J., Pope, C., Beal, C., Wolfram, W., Reaser, J. & Long, S. (2008). The Voices of North Carolina Professional Development Initiative: A New Literacies Approach to Teaching Language Effectively in the Middle Grades. In K. McFerrin, R. Weber, R. Carlsen & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2008--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4672-4678). Las Vegas, Nevada, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 21, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/27999/.
- Adger, C.T., Wolfram, W., and Christian, D. (2007). Dialects in Schools and Communities. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
- Albers, P., & Harste, J.C. (2007). The arts, new literacies and multimodality. English Education 40(1), 6-24.
- Andrews, L. (2006). Language Exploration and Awareness: A Resource Book for Teachers. Third Ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Balfanz, R. (2006). Why Are Achievement Gains So Difficult to Realize in High Poverty Middle Grade Schools? What Can Be Done About It? Conjectures from a Decade of Work. Presentation at the National Symposium on Middle Level Education: Where Do We Go From Here? Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
- Braddock, R, Lloyd-Jones, R, & Schoer, L (1963). Research on Written Composition. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
- Brink, B. (2006). School for profit. The Fort Worth Weekly Feature, January 18.
- DeBoer, J.J. (1959). Grammar in language teaching. Elementary English, 36, 413-421.
- Elbow, P. (1990). What Is English? New York: The Modern Language Association and the National Council of Teachers of English.
- Elley, W.B., Barham, I.H., Lamb, H., & Wyllie, M. (1976). The role of grammar in a secondary English curriculum. Research in the Teaching of English, 10, 5-21.
- Fasold, R.W. (1971). What can an English teacher do about nonstandard dialect? English Record, 21, 82-91.
- Green, L.J. (2002). African American English: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hartwell, P. (1985). Grammar, grammar, and the teaching of grammar. College English, 47, 105-127.
- Hillocks, G. (1986). Research on Written Composition. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
- Kist, W. (2005). New literacies in action: Teaching and learning in multiple media. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2005). New literacies changing knowledge and classroom learning. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
- Lippi-Green, R. (1997). Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States. London: Routledge.
- Mason, C., Berson, M., Diem, R., Hicks, D., Lee, J., & Dralle, T. (2000). Guidelines for using technology to prepare social studies teachers. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 1(1), 107-116.
- McQuade, F. (1980). Examining a grammar course: The rationale and the result. English journal, 69, 26-30.
- Pope, C., & Golub, J. (2000). Preparing tomorrow's English language arts teachers today: Principles and practices for infusing technology. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 1 (1). Available: http://www.citejournal.org/vol1/iss1/currentissues/english/article1.htm
- Punya, M. & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record,108(6), 1017-1054.
- Reaser, J. & Wolfram, W. (2005). Voices of North Carolina: Language and Life from the Atlantic to the Appalachians. Raleigh, NC: NC State University.
- Redd, T.M., & Webb, K.S. (2005). A Teacher’s Introduction to African American English: What a Writing Teacher Should Know. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
- Swenson, J. (2006, May). Language arts. In G. Knezek, R. Christensen, L. Bell, & G. Bull, National technology leadership summit report: Identifying key research issues (pp. 18-23), Learning& Leading with
- Young, C.A. & Bush, J. (2004). Teaching the English language arts with technology: A critical approach and pedagogical framework. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 4(1). Available: http://www.citejournal.org/vol4/iss1/languagearts/article1.cfm
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact email@example.com.