You are here:

Teacher Candidates’ Needs, Expectations of, and Attitudes toward Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) Learning and Integration

, , The University of Windsor, Canada

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-64-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


This paper is based on an exploratory study designed to obtain pre-service teachers' expectations of and attitudes toward the learning and integrating Communication Technologies (ICT) into their future classrooms. Because of the diverse demographic backgrounds and social conditions of the teacher candidates, such as age, gender, English language proficiency, and previous education, we expected a wide range of responses to the online survey and the semi-structured focus group questions. By implementing the sequential mixed research design we were able to distinguish emerging themes related to participants' social conditions that impact their perceptions and attitudes regarding the ICT and beliefs about its use in their future career. The findings from this study could be employed as useful reference for the design of ICT curriculum for the Teacher Education programs.


Zhang, Z. & Martinovic, _. (2008). Teacher Candidates’ Needs, Expectations of, and Attitudes toward Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) Learning and Integration. In K. McFerrin, R. Weber, R. Carlsen & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2008--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3427-3434). Las Vegas, Nevada, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 21, 2019 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Barnes, K., Marateo, R.C., & Ferris, S.P. (2007). Teaching and learning with the net generation. Innovate, 3(4). Retrieved July 30, 2007 from
  2. Batane, T. (2004). Inservice teacher training and technology: A case of Botswana. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(3), 387-410.
  3. Culp, K., Honey, M., & Mandinach, E. (2005). A retrospective on twenty years of education technology policy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(3), 279-307.
  4. Kearsley, G. (2004). Commentary on: Clark, K., Parsia, B. And Hendler, J. (2004) Will the Semantic Web change education? Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3. Retrieved January 14, 2008 from Kraut, R., Olson, J., Banaji, M., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J., & Couper, M. (2004). Psychological research online: Report of board of scientific affairs' advisory group on the conduct of research on the internet. American Psychologist, 59, 105-17.
  5. Magliaro, E. (2006). Computer self-efficacy beliefs of preservice teachers: Implementation of a concurrent mixed-model. Unpublished Master’s thesis. The University of Windsor.
  6. Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  7. Montgomerie, C. & Irvine, V. (2001). Computer skill requirements for new and existing teachers: Implications for policy and practice. Journal of Teaching& Learning, 1(1), 43-55.
  8. Murphy, C. (2000). Effective use of ICT by student teachers: Is it improving? Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference. Proceedings of SITE 2000, San Diego, Ca, USA, 1656-61.
  9. National Higher Education ICT Initiative. (2007). Succeeding in the 21st century: What higher education must do to address the gap in Information and Communication Technology proficiencies. Educational Testing Service. Retrieved January 15, 2008 from Oblinger, D. (2004). The Next Generation of Educational Engagement. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2004 (8). Retrieved December 5, 2007 from
  10. Oblinger, D.C., & Oblinger, J.L. (eds.) (2005). Educating the Net Generation. Washington D.C.: EDUCAUSE. Retrieved on January 14, 2008 from Oren, A., Mioduser, D., & Nachmias, R. (2002). The development of social climate in virtual learning discussion groups. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1). Retrieved January 14, 2008 from
  11. Plante, J., & Beattie, D. (2004). Connectivity and ICT integration in Canadian elementary and secondary schools: First results from the Information and Communications Technologies in Schools Survey, 2003-2004. Culture, Tourism and the Centre for Education Statistics Division, Ottawa.
  12. Reid, S. (2002). The integration of ICT into classroom teaching. Research in Ontario Secondary Schools, 7(1). Retrieved October 15, 2006 from
  13. Reips, U.D. (2002). Standards for Internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49, 243-56.
  14. Sasseville, B. (2004). Integrating Information and Communication Technology in classroom: A comparative discourse analysis. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 30(2), 5-27.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact