You are here:

The Design Evolution of Geographic Online Learning Environments
PROCEEDINGS

, , , , University of Minnesota, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-64-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

In this brief paper we 1) present an overview of three online geography education environments (i.e. MSE, LGGT, and Geothentic) designed to help learners and instructors achieve the aforementioned instructional scenario, 2) use a lens of design-based research to discuss how the evolution of the MSE and LGGT environments provided a foundation for the contemporary development of Geothentic, and 3) examine the influential roles that teachers and learners play in the design of such online environments. This examination of Geothentic and its predecessors will provide valuable findings that can be used to communicate how, when, and why certain design principles work in practice. This information will be essential, and extendable, to the instructional design field as we aspire to achieve elevated levels of learner engagement through design, implementation, and research of innovative and contemporary online learning environments.environments.

Citation

Doering, A., Miller, C., Scharber, C. & Veletsianos, G. (2008). The Design Evolution of Geographic Online Learning Environments. In K. McFerrin, R. Weber, R. Carlsen & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2008--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2010-2013). Las Vegas, Nevada, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 24, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Audet, R.H., & Paris, J. (1997). GIS implementation model for schools: Assessing the critical concerns. Journal of Geography, 96, 293-300.
  2. Bednarz, S., & Audet R. (2003). The status of GIS technology in teacher preparation programs. Journal of Geography, 98, 60–67.
  3. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
  4. Hughes, J.E. (2000). Teaching English with technology: Exploring teacher learning and practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
  5. Kerski, J. (1999). A nationwide analysis of the implementation of GIS in high school education. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual ESRI User Conference, San Diego, California. Retrieved August 11, 2006 from http://gis.esri.com/library/userconf/proc99/proceed/papers/pap202/p202.htm.
  6. Lavie, T., & Tractinsky, N. (2004). Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of websites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60, 269-298.
  7. Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  8. Reeves, T., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2004). A development research agenda for online collaborative learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 53-65.
  9. Sanders, R., Kajs, L., & Crawford, C. (2001). Electronic mapping in education: The use of Geographic Information Systems. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2), 121-129.
  10. Sandoval, W. (2004). Developing learning theory by refining conjectures embodied in educational designs. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 213-223.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.