You are here:

Integration Models for Hybrid Online Education in the K-12 Classroom
PROCEEDINGS

, , University of Minnesota, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-64-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

In this paper we sought to understand how teachers chose to integrate a hybrid online education program in their classrooms and how how students' experiences were influenced by the integration. Data collected via classroom observations, personal interviews, and focus groups suggest four integration models: curriculum-based, activities-based, standards-based, and media-based. These models are discussed in the context of adventure learning in particular and hybrid online education in general.

Citation

Doering, A. & Veletsianos, G. (2008). Integration Models for Hybrid Online Education in the K-12 Classroom. In K. McFerrin, R. Weber, R. Carlsen & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2008--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1069-1074). Las Vegas, Nevada, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 22, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Barron, A.E., Kemker, K., Harmes, C., & Kalaydjian, K. (2003). Large-scale research study on technology in K-12 schools: Technology integration as it relates to the national technology standards. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(4), 489-507.
  2. Dexter, S., Doering, A., & Riedel, E. (2006). Content area specific technology integration: A model and resources for educating teachers Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(2), 325-346.
  3. Doering, A. (2006). Adventure learning: Transformative hybrid online education. Distance Education 27(2), 197215.
  4. Doering, A. (2007). Adventure learning: Situating learning in an authentic context. Innovate-Journal of Online Education, 3(6).
  5. Doering, A., Hughes, J., & Huffman, D. (2003). Preservice teachers: Are we thinking with technology? Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 35(3), 342-361.
  6. Ertmer, P.A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39.
  7. Gilbert, D. (2006). Stumbling on happiness. Alfred A Knopf: New York.
  8. Hew, K. & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252.
  9. Hokanson, B., & Hooper, S. (2004). Levels of teaching: A taxonomy for instructional design. Educational Technology 44(6), 14-22.
  10. Kovalik, C. (2003). Reflections on a technology integration project. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(1), 73-90.
  11. Lombard, R.H. (2004). Social studies and the web today. Computers in the Schools, 21 (3/4).
  12. Martorella, P. (1997). Technology and social studies-or: Which way to the sleeping giant? Theory and Research in Social Education, 25(4).
  13. McIsaac, M., Gunawardena, C. (2001). Distance Education. In David H. Jonassen, (Ed), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Pp. 403-437.
  14. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  15. Moore, M.G. & Kearsly, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  16. Picciano A.G. & Seaman, J. (2007). K–12 Online Learning: A Survey of U.S. School District Administrators. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. Retrieved, July 13, 2007, from http://www.sloanc.org/publications/survey/pdf/K-12_Online_Learning.pdf
  17. Smith, R., Clark, T., & Blomeyer, R.L. (2005) A Synthesis of New Research on K–12 Online Learning. Retrieved July 12, 2007 from http://www.ncrel.org/tech/synthesis/synthesis.pdf Strudler N., & Wetzel, K. (1999) Lessons from exemplary colleges of Education: Factors affecting technology integration in preservice programs. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47 (4), 63-83.
  18. Whittaker, S., & Sidner, C. (1996). Email overload: exploring personal information management of email. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, (pp. 276-283), April 1318,

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.