Are We Preparing Young People for 21st-Century Citizenship With 20th-Century Thinking? Building a Case for a Virtual Laboratory of Democracy
Article
Joseph O’Brien, University of Kansas, United States
CITE Journal Volume 8, Number 2, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
“We need a clear citizens’ vision of the way the Net ought to grow, a firm idea of the kind of media environment we would like to see in the future. If we do not develop such a vision for ourselves, the future will be shaped for us by large commercial and political powerholders” (Rheingold, 2000, p. 6). If the online environment is not considered as substantially different from the offline one, social studies educators run the risk of applying preconceived notions not only of citizenship, citizenship education, freedom of expression, and commercial and public space to the online environment, thus, limiting its potential and young people’s preparation for it. To prepare young people for online civic participation, A publicly supported virtual laboratory of democracy should be created that enables young people to become socialized to an online civic society and to learn how to act—in a civic manner—upon issues of importance to them and the larger society.
Citation
O’Brien, J. (2008). Are We Preparing Young People for 21st-Century Citizenship With 20th-Century Thinking? Building a Case for a Virtual Laboratory of Democracy. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2), 125-157. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved March 18, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/27011/.
© 2008 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Anyon, J. (1978). Elementary social studies textbooks and legitimating knowledge. Theory and Research in Social Education, 6(3), 40-55.
- Balkin, J.M. (2004). Digital speech and democratic culture: A theory of freedom of expression for the information society. New York University Law Review, 79, 1-55.
- BBC News. (2006, January 25). Google censors itself for China. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4645596.stm
- Benkler, Y. (2002). Coase’s Penguin, or, Linux and “The nature of the firm.” The Yale Law Journal, 112(3), 369-446.
- Bennett, S.F. (2005, September). An analysis of the depiction of democratic participation in American civics textbooks. Paper presented at the German-American Conference on Responsible Education and the Constitution, Freiburg, Germany. Retrieved on April 30, 2008, from Center for Civic Education Website: http://www.civiced.org/pdfs/germanPaper0905/FrouzeshBennett2005.pdf
- Bers, M.U., & Chau, C. (2006). Fostering civic engagement by building a virtual city. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue3/bers.html
- Boston, B.O., Pearson, S.S., & Halperin, S. Eds. (2005). Restoring the balance between academics and civic engagement in public schools. Retrieved April 23, 2008, from the American Youth Policy Forum Website: http://www.aypf.org/publications/Restoring%20the%20Balance%20Report.pdf
- Boyle, J. (2003). The second enclosure movement and the construction of the public domain. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66, 33-73. Retrieved from http://www.law.duke.edu/pd/papers/boyle.pdf
- Brandeis, L.D. (1934). The curse of bigness. New York: Viking Press. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2)
- Butts, R.F. (1988). The moral imperative for American schools: “…inflame the civic temper…” American Educational Research Journal, 96(2), 162-194.
- Carnegie Foundation. (2003). The civic mission of schools, New York: Author.
- Carroll, J.D., Broadnax, W.D., Contreras, G., Mann, E., Ornstein, N.J., & Stiehm, J. (1987). We the people:A review of US government and civics textbooks. Washington, DC: People for the American Way. Center for Digital Democracy. The dot-commons concept: Making the Internet safe for democracy. Retrieved May 5, 2008, from http://web.archive.org/web/20011009032024/http://www.democraticmedia.org/issues/digitalcommons/index.html
- Chester, J. (2007). Digital destiny: New media and the future of democracy. New York: The New Press.
- Coleman, S. (2006). Digital voices and analogue citizenship: Bridging the gap between young people and the democratic process. Public Policy Research, 13(4), 257-262.
- Coleman, S. (2004). The network-empowered Citizen: How people share civic knowledge online. Retrieved April 30, 2008, from the Oxford Internet Institute for the Communities and Participation Website: http://www.ippr.org.uk/uploadedFiles/research/projects/Digital_Society/the_networkeMpowered_citizen_coleman.pdf
- De Toqueville, A. (1848). Democracy in America. Retrieved April 30, 2008, from the American Studies at the University of Virginia Website: http://xroads.virginia.edu/~HYPER/DETOC/ch2_05.htm
- Engle, S., & Ochoa, A. (1988). Education for democratic citizenship: Decision-making in the social studies. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Evans, R., & Saxe, D. (1996). Handbook on teaching social issues. Washington DC: National Council for the Social Studies.
- Flanagan, C., & Faison, N. (2001). Youth civic development: Implications of research for social policy and programs. Social Policy Report, 25(1), 3-15.
- Fountain, J. (2001). The virtual state: Transforming American government? National Civic Review, 9 (3), 241-252.
- Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109-142).
- Froomkin, A.M. (2003). Habermas@discourse.net: Toward a critical theory of cyberspace. Harvard Law Review, 116(3), 749-873.
- Galston, W. (2001). Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 217-234.
- Goldsmith, J.L. (1998). Against cyberanarchy. University of Chicago Law Review, 65(4), 1199-1250.
- Greenhill, A., & Fletcher, G. (2003). Social construction of electronic space. Retrieved May 1, 2008, from http://www.spaceless.com/papers/12.htm
- Griffiths, M. (2004). E-citizens: Blogging as democratic practice. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 2(3). Retrieved from http://www.ejeg.com/volume-2/volume2issue3/v2-i3-art2.htm
- Hess, K. (1979). Community technology. New York: Harper and Row.
- Hunt, M.P., & Metcalf, L.E. (1968). Teaching high school social studies: Problems in reflective thinking and social understanding (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
- Hunter, D. (2003). Cyberspace as place and the tragedy of the digital anticommons. California Law Review, 91(2), 439-519.
- Kakabadse, A., Kakabadse, N.K., & Kouzmin, A. (2003). Reinventing the democratic governance project through information technology? A growing agenda for debate. Public Administration Review, 63(1) 44-60.
- Kampen, J.K., & Snijkers, K. (2003). E-Democracy: A critical evaluation of the ultimate edream. Social Sciences Computer Review, 21(4), 491-496.
- Kansas Department of Education. (2004). Kansas standards for history and government: Economics and geography. Retrieved from http://www.ksde.org/Default.aspx?tabid=143
- Koch, A. (2005). Cyber citizen or cyborg citizen: Baudrillard, political agency, and the commons in virtual politics, Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 20(2 & 3), 159-175.
- Lemley, M.A. (2003). Place and cyberspace. California Law Review, 91(2), 521-542.
- Lessig, L. (2004). Free culture: The nature and future of creativity. New York: Penguin Books. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2)
- Levine, P. (2002). Can the Internet rescue democracy? Toward an on-line commons. In R. Hayduk, & K.Matteson, (Eds.), Democracy’s moment: Reforming the American political system for the 21st century (pp. 121-137). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Longford, G. (2005). Pedagogies of digital citizenship and the politics of code. Techne: Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Technology [Online serial], 9(1). Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v9n1/longford.html
- Martin, L.A., & Chiodo, J.J. (2007). Good citizenship: What students in rural students have to say about it. Theory& Research in Social Education, 35(1), 112-134.
- Martin, P.P. (2006). Virtual environments for citizen participation: Principal bases for design. Retrieved from http://www.eparticipa.org/en/files/e_Participa.VirtualEnvironmentsForCitizenParticipation.pdf
- Martorella, P. (1996). Teaching social studies in middle and secondary schools (2nd ed.). New York: Merrill.
- Menezes, I. (2003). Participation experiences and civic concepts, attitudes and engagement: Implications for citizenship education projects. European Educational Research Journal, 2(3), 430-445.
- Moon, M.J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424-433.
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). Internet access in the U.S. Public schools and classrooms: 1994-2005 – Highlights. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
- Niemi, R.G., & Junn, J. (1998). Civic education: What makes students learn. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Niemi, N.S., & Niemi, R.G. (2007). Partisanship, participation, and political trust as taught (or not) in high school history and government classes. Theory& Research in Social Education, 35(1), 32-61.
- Noveck, B.S. (2005). Democracy of groups. First Monday, 10(11). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=838385
- Parker, W., & Zumeta, W. (1999). Toward an aristocracy of everyone: Policy study in the high school curriculum. Theory& Research in Social Education, 27(1), 9-44.
- Patrick, J.J. (2003). Teaching democracy globally, internationally, and comparatively: The 21st century civic mission of schools. Retrieved April 30, 2008, from the Center for Civic Education Website: http://www.civiced.org/papers/articles_patrick_global.pdf
- Post, D.G. (2002). Against “Against Cyberanarchy.” Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 17(4), 1365-1387.
- Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community. Homesteading on the electronic frontier (Rev. Ed). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Rheingold, H. (2006, October). The pedagogy of civic participation [audio recording] Presentation for the Impact of Digital Media Symposium. Retrieved April 23, 2008, from the New Media Consortium Campus Observer Website: http://sl.nmc.org/wiki/Rheingold_Presentation
- Rundle, M. (2005). Beyond Internet governance: The emerging international framework for governing the networked world. Retrieved April 24, 2008, from The Berkman Center for Internet& Society Website: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/publications/2005/Beyond_Internet_Governance
- Schwartz, J.D. (1984). Participation and multisubjective understanding: An interpretivist approach to the study of political participation. The Journal of Politics, 46(4), 1117-1141.
- Sears, A., & Hughes, A. (2006). Citizenship: Education or indoctrination? Citizenship Teaching& Learning 2(1), 4-17.
- Shaver, J. (1977). Comments of James P. Shaver. In R.D. Barr, J.L. Barth, & S.S. Shermis (Eds.), Defining the social studies (pp. 114-117). Arlington, VA: National Council for the
- Thornton, S.J. (1994). The social studies near century’s end: Reconsidering patterns of curriculum and instruction. Review of Research in Education, 20, 223-254.
- Thornton, S.J. (2005). Teaching social studies that matters: Curriculum for active learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Torney-Purta, J., & Lopez, S.V. (2006). Developing citizenship competencies from kindergarten through grade 12: A background paper for policymakers and educators. Denver, CO:Education Commission of the States and National Center for Learning and Citizenship.
- VanFossen, P. (2006). The Electronic Republic? Evidence on the Impact of the Internet on citizenship and civic engagement in the U.S. International Journal of Social Education, 21(1), 18-43.
- Van Hover, S., Berson, M.J., Bolick, C.M., & Swan, K.O. (2006). Implications of ubiquitous computing for the social studies curriculum (Republished). Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(2). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol6/iss2/socialstudies/article4.cfm
- Vermont Department of Education. (2000). Vermont’s framework of standards and learning opportunities. Retrieved from http://education.vermont.gov/new/html/pubs/framework.html
- Vincenti, W.G. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it. Analytical studies from aeronautical history. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
- Virginia Department of Education. (2001). History and social science standards of learning curriculum framework 2001. Retrieved from http://www.pen.k-12.va.us/VDOE/Instruction/History/hist_ss_framework.html
- Wade, R.C., & Everett, S. (1994). Civic participation in third grade social studies textbooks. Social Education, 58(5), 308-311.
- Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237-269.
- White, S.C. (1982). A validation study of the Barth-Shermis Social Studies Preference Scale. Theory and Research in Social Education, 10(2), 1-20.
- Winner, L. (2005). Technological euphoria and contemporary citizenship. Techne: Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Technology [Online serial], 9(1), Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v9n1/winner.html
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesCited By
View References & Citations Map-
Perceptions of first year social studies teachers: Understanding their technology knowledge and use in the classroom
Aaron Bruewer, Ball State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2013 (Mar 25, 2013) pp. 2032–2035
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.