You are here:

Adult Learners' Online Inquiry-Based Learning Processes
PROCEEDINGS

, The University of Georgia, United States

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Orlando, FL USA ISBN 978-1-880094-60-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

Nurturing inquiry can make learning more meaningful and conducive to higher-order thinking. However, inquiry-based learning is not easy to adapt to because it requires a qualitative shift in students’ learning beliefs and skills. Current research on this area focuses intensively on K-12 students in mathematics and science in the face-to-face context; adults’ inquiry-based learning in other areas in the online context is largely ignored. To advance inquiry-based research and practice, the proposed qualitative study will investigate online adult students’ inquiry-based learning processes in the field of instructional technology. Three students were selected to facilitate in-depth understanding of the phenomenon. Findings of this study will help to extend the focus of current research on inquiry-based learning and enhance people’s understanding of it on a broader horizon.

Citation

Lin, J. (2006). Adult Learners' Online Inquiry-Based Learning Processes. In E. Pearson & P. Bohman (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2006--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 861-868). Orlando, FL USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 24, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Blumberg, P. (2000). Evaluating the evidence that problem-based learners are self-directed learners: A review of the literature. In D.H. Evensen & C.E. Hmelo. (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 199-266). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  2. Brown, A.L., & Campione, J.C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  3. Change, K.E., Sung, Y.T., & Lee, C.L. (2003). Web-based collaborative inquiry learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 9, 56-69.
  4. Chinn, C.A., & Malhotra, B.A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218.
  5. Crawford, B.A., Krajcik, J.S., & Marx, R.W. (1999). Elements of a community of learners in a middle school science classroom. Science Education, 83(6), 701-723.
  6. Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Pursuit of explanation within a computer-supported classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 26(8), 979-996.
  7. Hakkarainen, K., & Sintonen, M. (2002). The interrogative model of inquiry and computer-supported collaborative learning. Science and Education, 11(1), 25-43.
  8. Hancock, C., Kaput, J.J., & Goldsmith, L.T. (1992). Authentic inquiry with data: Critical barriers to classroom implementation. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 337-364.
  9. Hara, N., & Kling, R. (2001). Student distress in Web-based distance education. Education Quarterly, 3, 68-69.
  10. Inman, E., & Kerwin, M. (1999). Instructor and student attitudes toward distance learning. Community College Journal for Research and Practice, 23(6), 581-592.
  11. Jonassen, D. (1994). Computer in schools: Mindtools for critical thinking. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  12. Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B.B. (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7-23.
  13. Krajcik, J.S., Blumenfeld, P.C., Marx, R.W., Bass, K.M., & Fredricks, J. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3/4), 313-350.
  14. Krajcik, J.S., Blumenfeld, P.C., Marx, R.W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Instructional, curricular, and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms. In J. Minstrell & E.H.V. Zee (Eds.), Inquirying into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 283-315). Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  15. Kuhn, D., Black, J., Keselman, A., & Kaplan, D. (2000). The development of cognitive skills to support inquiry learning. Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 495-523.
  16. Lim, B.R. (2004). Challenges and issues in designing inquiry on the Web. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 627-643.
  17. Linn, M.C., & Slotta, J.D. (2000). WISE science. Educational Leadership, 58(2), 29-32.
  18. Middleton, A.J. (1997). How effective is distance education? International Journal of Instructional Media, 24(2), 133-137.
  19. Moller, L. (1998). Designing communities of learners for asyncronous distance education. Educational Technology Research& Development, 6(4), 115-122.
  20. National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Distance Education at Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions: 20002001 Retrieved Jan, 10, 2005, from http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/peqis/publications/2003017/#two National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1984). A nation at risk: The full account. Cambridge, MA: USA Research.
  21. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  22. Sandoval, W.A. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634-656.
  23. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1993). Technologies for knowledge-building discourse. Communications of the ACM 36(5), 3741.
  24. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265-283.
  25. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  26. Supovitz, J.A., Mayer, D.P., & Kahle, J.B. (2000). Promoting inquiry-based instructional practice: The longitudinal impact of professional development in the context of systemic reform. Educational Policy, 14(3), 331-356.
  27. White, B.Y., & Frederiksen, J.R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118.
  28. Zuckerman, G., Chudinova, E.V., & Khavkin, E.E. (1998). Inquiry as a pivotal element of knowledge acquisition within the Vygotskian paradigm: Building a science curriculum for the elementary school. Cognition and Instruction, 16(2), 201233.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.