References

1. DeBourgh, G.A. (1999). Technology is the tool, teaching is the task: Student satisfaction in distance learning. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Information Technology&
2. Donahue, T.L., & Wong, E.H. (1997). Achievement motivation and college satisfaction in traditional and nontraditional students. Education, 118, 237-243. Retrieved August 28, 2001, from: InfoTrac database (Item A20479498).
3. Edwards, J.E., & Waters, L.K. (1982). Involvement, ability, performance, and satisfaction as predictors of college attrition. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 1149-1152.
4. Feenberg, A. (1999). Distance learning: Promise or threat? Retrieved October 25, 2001, from: http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/feenberg/TELE3.HTM
5. Aggarwal, A. (Ed.) (2000). Web-based learning and teaching technologies: Opportunities and challenges. Hershey, PA: Idea Publishing Group.
6. Finaly-Neumann, E. (1994). Coursework characteristics and students’ satisfaction with instructions. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 21(2), 14-19.
7. Gunawardena, C.N., & Zittle, R.H. (1998). Faculty development programmes in distance education in American higher education. In C. Latchem& F. Lockwood (Eds.), Staff development in open and flexible learning (pp. 105-114). New York: Routledge.
8. Astin, A.W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9. Hara, N., & Kling, R. (2000). Students’ distress with a web-based distance education course: An ethnographic study of participants’ experiences. Bloomington, IN: Center for Social Informatics. Retrieved August 24, 2001, from: http://www.slis.indiana.edu/CSI/wp00-01.html
10. Bailey, B.L., Bauman, C., & Lata, K.A. (1998). Student retention and satisfaction: The evolution of a predictive model. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Institutional Research Conference, Minneapolis, MN. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED424797)
11. Bean, J.P., & Bradley, R.K. (1986). Untangling the satisfactionperformance relationship form college students. Journal of Higher Education, 57, 393-412.
12. Belanger, F., & Jordan, D.H. (2000). Evaluation and implementation of distance learning: Technologies, tools and techniques. Hershey, PA: Idea Publishing Group.
13. Biner, P.M. (1993). The development of an instrument to measure student attitudes toward televised courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 7(1), 62-73.
14. Biner, P.M., Dean, R.S., & Mellinger, A.E. (1994). Factors underlying distance learner satisfaction with televised college-level courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(1), 60-71.
15. Bonk, C.J., & Cunningham, D.J. (1998). Searching for learnercentered, constructivist, and sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In C.J. Bonk& K.S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse (pp. 25-50). Mahwah, NJ:
16. Card, K.A., & Horton, L. (2000). Providing access to graduate education using computer-mediated communication. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27, 235.
17. Chong, S.M. (1998). Models of asynchronous computer conferencing for collaborative learning in large college classes. In C.J. Bonk& K.S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse (pp. 157-182). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. 66Chute, A.G., Thompson, M.M., & Hancock, B.W. (1999). The McGraw-Hill handbook of distance learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. Harrison, N. (1999). How to design self-directed and distance learning. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
20. Hiltz, S.R. (1993). Correlates of learning in a virtual classroom. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39, 71-98.
21. Hobbs, V.M., & Christianson, J.S. (1997). Virtual classrooms. Educational opportunity through two-way interactive television. Basel: Technomic Publishing.
22. Jaffee, D. (1998). Institutionalized resistance to asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(2). Retrieved October 25, 2001, from: http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/vol2_issue2/jaffee.htm
23. Keegan, D. (1990). Foundations of distance education (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
24. Knox, W.E., Lindsay, P., & Kolb, M.N. (1993). Does college make a difference? Long-term changes in activities and attitudes. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
25. Maki, R.H., Maki, W.S., Patterson, M., & Whittaker, P.D. (2000). Evaluation of a web-based introductory psychology course: I. Learning and satisfaction in online versus lecture course. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 230-239.
26. Mood, T.A. (1995). Distance education: An annotated bibliography. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
27. Moore, M.G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (1998). Issue brief: Distance education in higher educational institutions: Incidences, audiences, and plans to expand. Retrieved October 25, 2001, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs98/98132.html
28. Rahm, D., & Reed, B.J. (1998). Tangled webs in public administration: Organizational issues in distance learning. Public Administration Management: An Interactive Journal, 3(1). Retrieved October 25, 2001, from: http://www.pamij.com/rahm.html
29. Navarro, P. (2000). The promise-and potential pitfalls-of cyberlearning. In R.A. Cole (Ed.), Issues in web-based pedagogy (pp. 281-297). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
30. Richards, C.N., & Ridley, D.R. (1997). Factors affecting college students’ persistence in on-line computer-managed instruction. College Student Journal, 31, 490-495.
31. Navarro, P., & Shoemaker, J. (2000). Performance and perceptions of distance learners in cyberspace. The American Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 15-35.
32. Shaw, S., & Polovina, S. (1999). Practical experiences of, and lessons learnt from, internet technologies in higher education. Educational Technology& Society, 2(2). Retrieved November 02, 1999, from: http://ifets.ieee.og/periodical/vol._3_99/stephen_shaw.html
33. Neely, L., Niemi, J.A., & Ehrhard, B.J. (1998). Classes going the distance so people don’t have to: Instructional opportunities for adult learners. T.H.E. Journal Online, 26(4). Retrieved August 28, 2001, from: http://www.thejournal.com/magazine/vault/A2039.cfm
34. Noble, D.F. (1998). Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. First Monday, 3(1). Retrieved October 25, 2001, from http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue3_1/noble/index.html
35. Palloff, R.M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36. Powers, S.M., Davis, M., & Torrence, E. (1999). Person-environment interaction in the virtual classroom: An initial examination. Paper presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Houston, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 436 185) January-March 2004 • International Journal on E-Learning
37. Smith, P.L., & Dillon, C.L. (1999). Comparing distance learning and classroom learning: Conceptual considerations. The American Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 6-23.
38. Wegerif, R. (1998). The social dimensions of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(1). Retrieved October 25, 2001, from: http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/vol2_issue1/wegerif.htm
39. Wetzel, C.D., Radtke, P.H., & Stern, H.W. (1994). Instructional effectiveness of video media. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. Williams, W.M., & Ceci, S.J. (1997). "How’m I doing?" Problems with student ratings of instructors and courses. Change, 29, 12-23.

Cited By

• Students’ Experiences, Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in e-Learning

  Chin Goh, Choi Leong, Kalsum Kasmin, Puong Hii & Owee Tan

  Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society Vol. 13, No. 2 (May 29, 2017)

• The Impact of Self-Regulation Strategies on Student Success and Satisfaction in an Online Course

  Fethi Inan, Texas Tech University, United States; Erman Yukselturk, Kirikkale University, Turkey; Murat Kurucay, Bulent Ecevit University, Turkey; Raymond Flores, Texas Tech University, United States

  International Journal on E-Learning 16 (February 2017) pp. 23–32

• Blended Learning (BL) for Adult Education in Belgium (Flanders): The case of Centers for Adult Education (CAE)

  Paul Munteh Ndichia, Vrije Universiteit Brussel., Belgium

  EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2015 (Jun 22, 2015) pp. 1952–1958

• An Examination of the Usefulness of a Learning Community System and Blackboard in both Online and Face-to-Face Courses

  Francisca Marshall, Wenting Jiang & Vanessa Dennen, Florida State University, United States

  E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2015 (Oct 19, 2015) pp. 1136–1141

• Is blended e-learning as measured by an achievement test and self-assessment better than traditional classroom learning for vocational high school students?

  Chi-Cheng Chang, Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development National Taiwan Normal University; Kuen-Ming Shu, Department of Mechanical and Computer-aided Engineering National Formosa University; Chaoyun Liang, Department of Bio-Industry Communication and Development National Taiwan University; Ju-Shih Tseng & Yu-Sheng Hsu, Department of Technology Application & Human Resource Development National Taiwan Normal University

  The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 15, No. 2 (Apr 01, 2014)

• A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs

  Yu-Chun Kuo, Jackson State University; Andrew Walker & Brian Belland, Utah State University; Kerstin Schroder, University of Alabama at Birmingham

  The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 14, No. 1 (Feb 14, 2013) pp. 16–39

• Interaction and Learning Outcomes in Online Learning Environments

  Yu-Chun Kuo, Jackson State University, United States; Yu-Tung Kuo, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan

  Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2013 (Mar 25, 2013) pp. 662–670

• Students’ Satisfaction from Blended Learning Instruction

  Maria Giannousi, Nicholas Vernadakis, Vassiliki Derri, Maria Michalopoulos & Efthimis Kioumourtzoglou, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece

  TCC 2009 (2009) pp. 61–68

• Development and validation of the Online Student Connectedness Survey (OSCS)

  Doris Bolliger, University of Wyoming; Fethi Inan, Texas Tech University

  The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 13, No. 3 (May 22, 2012) pp. 41–65

• Competencies for Hospitality in Online Teaching

  Mary Anne Weegar & Lynne Anderson, National University, United States

  E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2012 (Oct 09, 2012) pp. 1355–1358

• Evaluating the Satisfaction of Distance Education Students of the University of the West Indies, Open Campus

  Benita Thompson, The University of the West Indies, Barbados

  E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2011 (Oct 18, 2011) pp. 960–965

• Activity Notification: Enhancing the Social Nature of Online Learning

  James Laffey, David Reid, Ran-Young Hong, Krista Galyen, Xiaolin Xie & Douglas Kueker, Univ. of Missouri-Columbia, United States

  EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2011 (Jun 27, 2011) pp. 1085–1093

• The relationship between learning satisfaction and social ability in completely online learning courses

  Krista Galyen, University of Missouri, United States; I-Chun Tsai, University of Akron, United States; James Laffey, University of Missouri, United States

  EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2010 (Jun 29, 2010) pp. 1941–1947

• Using Activity Theory to Examine Social Interaction of Online Learning

  I-Chun Tsai, University of Akron, Ohio, United States; Krista Galyen, Xiaolin Xie & James Laffey, University of Missouri, United States

  EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2010 (Jun 29, 2010) pp. 1202–1211

• The Effect of Student Interactions and Internet Self-Efficacy on Satisfaction in Two Synchronous Interwise Course Sessions

  Yu-Chun Kuo, Utah State University, United States; Yu-Tung Kuo, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan; Andrew Walker, Utah State University, United States

  Global Learn 2010 (May 17, 2010) pp. 4242–4246

• Using Model Checking to Automatically Mark Graphical E-Learning Exercises

  Siepermann Markus, Richard Lackes & Chris Börgermann, University of Dortmund, Germany

  EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2008 (Jun 30, 2008) pp. 5302–5307

• "Online Everything?" Student Expectations of Online Learning

  Helen Lyons & Liz Aspden, Sheffield Hallam University, United Kingdom

  E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2008 (Nov 17, 2008) pp. 2945–2951

• Virtual Schooling and K-12 Online Learning Goes Into Preservice Teacher Education, Part 2

  Niki Davis, Iowa State University CTLT, United States; Rick Ferdig & Jade Coutts, University of Florida, United States; Amina Charania, Iowa State University CTLT, United States; Z Schoeny & Curby Alexander, University of Virginia, United States; Ron Ellis, Graceland University, United States; Lily Compton & Karly Wortmann, Iowa State University CTLT, United States; Ray Rose, Rose-Smith Associates, United States

  Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2008 (Mar 03, 2008) pp. 323–331

• Bru-N-O'Mat - Automatically Generating and Marking Net Requirements Calculation Exercises

  Richard Lackes & Markus Siepermann, University of Dortmund, Germany

  E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2007 (Oct 15, 2007) pp. 7198–7204

• The Relationship of E-Learner Satisfaction, E-Learning Self-Efficacy and Perceived Usefulness

  Joy Womble, Alliant International University, United States

  E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2006 (October 2006) pp. 2494–2498

• Lecture Accompanying E-Learning Exercises with Automatic Marking

  Markus Siepermann, University of Dortmund, Germany

  E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2005 (October 2005) pp. 1750–1755

• Designing Learning Experiences for Virtual Spaces

  María J. Verdú, University of Valladolid, Spain; Elena Verdú, CEDETEL, Spain; Luisa M. Regueras & Juan Pablo de Castro, University of Valladolid, Spain

  EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2005 (Jun 27, 2005) pp. 394–401

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.